Team:NYMU-Taipei/ymiq4.html
From 2012.igem.org
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>The horizontal axis stands for day passed, while the vertical axis is the absorbance of an OD 730nm. According to the graph, sqr expressing strain grew much better than wild type strain when sulfide was added into the medium. This result suggests that sqr is not only expressed but functional in the cyanobacteria.<br /> | <p>The horizontal axis stands for day passed, while the vertical axis is the absorbance of an OD 730nm. According to the graph, sqr expressing strain grew much better than wild type strain when sulfide was added into the medium. This result suggests that sqr is not only expressed but functional in the cyanobacteria.<br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
</p></div> | </p></div> | ||
Line 101: | Line 102: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>We established a H2S standard curve to quantify H2S concentration inside our experiments.<br /> | <p>We established a H2S standard curve to quantify H2S concentration inside our experiments.<br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
</p></div> | </p></div> | ||
Line 120: | Line 122: | ||
(2) | (2) | ||
Different Concentration under 48HR | Different Concentration under 48HR | ||
- | + | </p><div class=out style='text-align:center'> | |
<p align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/59/Ymiq8.png" width="386" /><br /> | <p align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/59/Ymiq8.png" width="386" /><br /> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 127: | Line 129: | ||
We followed the experiments in 48hrs and analyzed the H2S consumption in different groups. As the same as our expected, in 48hrs, our ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli depleted much more H2S than 24hrs timepoint.<br /> | We followed the experiments in 48hrs and analyzed the H2S consumption in different groups. As the same as our expected, in 48hrs, our ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli depleted much more H2S than 24hrs timepoint.<br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 136: | Line 139: | ||
<div align="left"> | <div align="left"> | ||
- | + | (1) 500mM H2S | |
<div class=out style='text-align:center'> | <div class=out style='text-align:center'> | ||
- | <p align="center"><img src="../../../ | + | <p align="center"><img src="../../../Users/jaymes/Desktop/ymiq9.png" width="628" height="153" /><br /> |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>If we analyze two group in the same H2S concentration, it’s easier to find out that our ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli consumed H2S dramatically.<br /> |
- | + | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
(2) | (2) | ||
- | + | 250mM H2S </p> | |
- | + | <div class=out style='text-align:center'> | |
- | <p align="center"><img src="../../../ | + | <p align="center"><img src="../../../Users/jaymes/Desktop/ymiq10.png" width="628" height="153" /><br /> |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | The experiment result are the same as previous group, ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli can consume much more H2S. <br /> | |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | (2) | ||
+ | 125mM H2S </p> | ||
+ | <div class=out style='text-align:center'> | ||
+ | <p align="center"><img src="../../../Users/jaymes/Desktop/ymiq11.png" width="628" height="177" /><br /> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>This diagram illustrates that even at a concentration of 125mM of sodium sulfide, the difference of consumption rate is obvious between sqr expressing strain and wild type one.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 01:42, 25 October 2012
Sulfide concentration and the growth of sqr expressing strain Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942
The horizontal axis stands for day passed, while the vertical axis is the absorbance of an OD 730nm. According to the graph, sqr expressing strain grew much better than wild type strain when sulfide was added into the medium. This result suggests that sqr is not only expressed but functional in the cyanobacteria.
Standard curve
We established a H2S standard curve to quantify H2S concentration inside our experiments.
Lab Incubation with Escherichia coli
We used different H2S concentration challenge ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli and tested H2S consumption in 24hrs. The result shows that ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli consumed much more H2S compred to the blank control, ptrc-str transformed E.coli. In other words, we believe our sqr gene works!!
(2)
Different Concentration under 48HR
Differences Between 24 HR and 48 HR under Same Concentration of H2S
If we analyze two group in the same H2S concentration, it’s easier to find out that our ptrc-sqr transformed E.coli consumed H2S dramatically.
(2)
250mM H2S
(2) 125mM H2S
This diagram illustrates that even at a concentration of 125mM of sodium sulfide, the difference of consumption rate is obvious between sqr expressing strain and wild type one.
References
Sulfide oxidation in gram-negative bacteria by expression of the sulfide–quinone reductase gene of Rhodobacter capsulatus and by electron transport to ubiquinone Hiroomi Shibata and Shigeki Kobayashi 2001
Sulfur metabolism in Thiorhodoceae. I. Quantitative measurements on growing cells of Chromatium okenii. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 30: 225–238 Trüper, H.G., and Schlegel, H.G. 1964.
-
Sulfide as Energy Generator
-
Sulfur Oxide Terminator
-
Denitrifying Machine
-
Cd+2 Collector
-
Becoming Venusian