"
Team:Calgary/Project/HumanPractices/Killswitch/KillGenes
From 2012.igem.org
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<p>When designing our actual kill genes, we needed to consider again the challenges of our environment. Many of the restriction enzymes found in the registry such as BamHI and Bgl2 are active only at temperatures around 37 C. Although our bioreactor may be at this temperature, the surrounding environment likely would not be. As the surrounding environment would be where our kill genes <i>should</i> be active, we needed to pick enzymes that would work at much lower temperatures. We also wanted enzymes that would cut very frequently in the <i>E. coli</i> genome to limit the chance of horizontal gene transfer. Finally, as we chose to use an inducible system, which can easily be mutated, we wanted to introduce some redundancy by using two different kill genes. </p> | <p>When designing our actual kill genes, we needed to consider again the challenges of our environment. Many of the restriction enzymes found in the registry such as BamHI and Bgl2 are active only at temperatures around 37 C. Although our bioreactor may be at this temperature, the surrounding environment likely would not be. As the surrounding environment would be where our kill genes <i>should</i> be active, we needed to pick enzymes that would work at much lower temperatures. We also wanted enzymes that would cut very frequently in the <i>E. coli</i> genome to limit the chance of horizontal gene transfer. Finally, as we chose to use an inducible system, which can easily be mutated, we wanted to introduce some redundancy by using two different kill genes. </p> | ||
| - | <p> We ended up choosing genes for two novel kill enzyme: S7 micrococcal nuclease and CviAII. Both of these | + | <p> We ended up choosing genes for two novel kill enzyme: S7 micrococcal nuclease and CviAII. Both of these enzymes are active at much lower temperatures than traditional restriction enzymes. Through sequence analysis of the <i>E. coli</i> genome, we also determined that they cut extremely frequently in the genome, much more so than BglII or BamHI even combined (figure 1). |
</html>[[File:UofC_CUTsiTES.png|centre|thumb|350px|Figure 1. Comparison of the number of cut sites of various enzymes within the MG1655 genome.]]<html> | </html>[[File:UofC_CUTsiTES.png|centre|thumb|350px|Figure 1. Comparison of the number of cut sites of various enzymes within the MG1655 genome.]]<html> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<h2>S7 micrococcal nuclease</h2> | <h2>S7 micrococcal nuclease</h2> | ||
| - | <p>S7 nuclease is native to <i>Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus </i> uses this enzyme to destroy extracellular DNA when it infects humans. S7 has both endo and exonuclease activity | + | <p>S7 nuclease is native to <i>Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus </i> uses this enzyme to destroy extracellular DNA when it infects humans to evade the immune system. S7 has both endo and exonuclease activity, and has a preference for -AT rich regions as opposed to -GC rich regions. However, this enzyme digests the DNA into <200 bp fragments. Ideally this enzyme will be present both intracellularly and extracellularly. We synthesized this enzyme from IDT, however this came with a mutation which altered a lysine residue to an isoleucine thereby making the enzyme dysfunctional. In order to overcome this issue, constructs with S7 were subjected to site-directed mutagenesis to restore the activity of the enzyme. </p> |
<h2>CviAII restriction enzyme</h2> | <h2>CviAII restriction enzyme</h2> | ||
| - | <p>CviAII is a restriction endonuclease that was sourced from the Chlorella virus PBCV-1 (Zhang et al., 1992). Our team selected this enzyme for three reasons. Firstly, this enzyme recognizes small, four-base pair restriction sites as opposed to other restriction enzymes such as the six-base cutter BamHI from the 2007 Berkely team (BBa_I716462). | + | <p>CviAII is a restriction endonuclease that was sourced from the <i>Chlorella</i> virus PBCV-1 (Zhang et al., 1992). Our team selected this enzyme for three reasons. Firstly, this enzyme recognizes small, four-base pair restriction sites as opposed to other restriction enzymes such as the six-base cutter BamHI from the 2007 Berkely team (BBa_I716462). Because of this, the CviAII restriction site is 16 times more prevalent in the E. coli genome and causes more thorough degradation of genetic material. Secondly, CviAII is able to cut Dam and Dcm methylated sites in the <i>E. coli</i> genome, and this decreased selectivity increases prevalence of cut sites. Finally, the temperature optimum for the enzyme is 23°C (Zhang et al., 1992). This optimum is closer to temperature conditions in the tailings ponds, and thus, CviAII will exhibit better enzyme activity as opposed to other enzymes in the registry with higher optimal temperatures.</p> |
| - | <h2>Nuclease assay: | + | <h2>Nuclease assay: Comparison Of Our Nucleases Versus Those In The 2011 Registry (BglII And BamHI):</h2> |
| - | <P> In order to compare the S7 and CviAII to other nucleases in the 2011 registry, we used combinations of commercial enzymes from New England Biolabs | + | <P> In order to compare the S7 and CviAII to other nucleases in the 2011 registry, we used combinations of commercial enzymes from New England Biolabs to digest <i>E. coli</i> genomic preps. Please view the <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Notebook/Protocols/nucleaseassay">nuclease assay protocol</a> for more details on how this was done. As shown in figure 2, S7 activity is extremely rapid and shows degradation at the zero time point. Following 45 minutes of incubation time S7 and CviAII have digested the <i>E. coli</i> genome into small fragments, whereas BamHI and BglII treated fragments are significantly larger. After 90 minutes, S7 and CviAII have sheared the genome into very small fragments (less than 200 bp in size) while there are no difference in the lanes with BglII and BamHI which are similar to the 45 minutes time point. |
</html>[[File:UCalgary2012 RE-S7&CviaII.png|thumb|300px|center|Figure 2: This assay compares the enzymes present in the regitry i.e, BglII and BamHI to the enzymes added by us, S7 and CviAII. This shows that S7 and CviAII degrade the DNA much quicker than BglII and BamHI combined.]]<html> | </html>[[File:UCalgary2012 RE-S7&CviaII.png|thumb|300px|center|Figure 2: This assay compares the enzymes present in the regitry i.e, BglII and BamHI to the enzymes added by us, S7 and CviAII. This shows that S7 and CviAII degrade the DNA much quicker than BglII and BamHI combined.]]<html> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 3 October 2012
Hello! iGEM Calgary's wiki functions best with Javascript enabled, especially for mobile devices. We recommend that you enable Javascript on your device for the best wiki-viewing experience. Thanks!
Kill Genes: An active approach
Background
When designing our actual kill genes, we needed to consider again the challenges of our environment. Many of the restriction enzymes found in the registry such as BamHI and Bgl2 are active only at temperatures around 37 C. Although our bioreactor may be at this temperature, the surrounding environment likely would not be. As the surrounding environment would be where our kill genes should be active, we needed to pick enzymes that would work at much lower temperatures. We also wanted enzymes that would cut very frequently in the E. coli genome to limit the chance of horizontal gene transfer. Finally, as we chose to use an inducible system, which can easily be mutated, we wanted to introduce some redundancy by using two different kill genes.
We ended up choosing genes for two novel kill enzyme: S7 micrococcal nuclease and CviAII. Both of these enzymes are active at much lower temperatures than traditional restriction enzymes. Through sequence analysis of the E. coli genome, we also determined that they cut extremely frequently in the genome, much more so than BglII or BamHI even combined (figure 1).
S7 micrococcal nuclease
S7 nuclease is native to Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus uses this enzyme to destroy extracellular DNA when it infects humans to evade the immune system. S7 has both endo and exonuclease activity, and has a preference for -AT rich regions as opposed to -GC rich regions. However, this enzyme digests the DNA into <200 bp fragments. Ideally this enzyme will be present both intracellularly and extracellularly. We synthesized this enzyme from IDT, however this came with a mutation which altered a lysine residue to an isoleucine thereby making the enzyme dysfunctional. In order to overcome this issue, constructs with S7 were subjected to site-directed mutagenesis to restore the activity of the enzyme.
CviAII restriction enzyme
CviAII is a restriction endonuclease that was sourced from the Chlorella virus PBCV-1 (Zhang et al., 1992). Our team selected this enzyme for three reasons. Firstly, this enzyme recognizes small, four-base pair restriction sites as opposed to other restriction enzymes such as the six-base cutter BamHI from the 2007 Berkely team (BBa_I716462). Because of this, the CviAII restriction site is 16 times more prevalent in the E. coli genome and causes more thorough degradation of genetic material. Secondly, CviAII is able to cut Dam and Dcm methylated sites in the E. coli genome, and this decreased selectivity increases prevalence of cut sites. Finally, the temperature optimum for the enzyme is 23°C (Zhang et al., 1992). This optimum is closer to temperature conditions in the tailings ponds, and thus, CviAII will exhibit better enzyme activity as opposed to other enzymes in the registry with higher optimal temperatures.
Nuclease assay: Comparison Of Our Nucleases Versus Those In The 2011 Registry (BglII And BamHI):
In order to compare the S7 and CviAII to other nucleases in the 2011 registry, we used combinations of commercial enzymes from New England Biolabs to digest E. coli genomic preps. Please view the nuclease assay protocol for more details on how this was done. As shown in figure 2, S7 activity is extremely rapid and shows degradation at the zero time point. Following 45 minutes of incubation time S7 and CviAII have digested the E. coli genome into small fragments, whereas BamHI and BglII treated fragments are significantly larger. After 90 minutes, S7 and CviAII have sheared the genome into very small fragments (less than 200 bp in size) while there are no difference in the lanes with BglII and BamHI which are similar to the 45 minutes time point.
