Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Amplification/Stochastic/results

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 18: Line 18:
<h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/4a/1.png" alt="" /> Sensibility </h1>
<h1><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/4a/1.png" alt="" /> Sensibility </h1>
</br>
</br>
-
The ODE modeling gave 10-6 molecules of CAMPi as the sensibility. This means, if we have 10-6 molecules of CAMP at the initial point, the system will turn on.  
+
The ODE modeling gave 10<SUP>-6</SUP> molecules of CAMPi as the sensibility. This means, if we have 10-6 molecules of CAMP at the initial point, the system will turn on.  
But this result is given by a deterministic analysis. What happens if we take into account the random phenomena of the bacterium ? Is the sensibility still so good ?
But this result is given by a deterministic analysis. What happens if we take into account the random phenomena of the bacterium ? Is the sensibility still so good ?
</section>
</section>

Revision as of 08:23, 19 September 2012

iGEM Grenoble 2012

Project

Goal


In this part we would like to answer 2 questions thanks to the stochastic modeling.

      Is the sensibility given by stochastic modeling the same that in ODE modeling ?
      What is the part of false positives ?
Thanks to those 2 questions we will be able to establish if our device is still performing when we take into account random variations.

Sensibility


The ODE modeling gave 10-6 molecules of CAMPi as the sensibility. This means, if we have 10-6 molecules of CAMP at the initial point, the system will turn on. But this result is given by a deterministic analysis. What happens if we take into account the random phenomena of the bacterium ? Is the sensibility still so good ?

False positives