"
Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/31
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
There is no wild type in the experiments, but thanks to the glucose we can say that there is no basal production of Gfp/Cya (it is the same because they are regulated by the same promotor. | There is no wild type in the experiments, but thanks to the glucose we can say that there is no basal production of Gfp/Cya (it is the same because they are regulated by the same promotor. | ||
| + | The problem with the receptor model is that we have a lot of equations and thus too much parameters (16). After a meeting with our advisors we decided to simplify the equations and chose a different model. | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
For the deterministic model of the receptor, we chose to model reactions of the receptor behavior by a series of complexations. We got the inspiration from iGEM Imperial College 2010. | For the deterministic model of the receptor, we chose to model reactions of the receptor behavior by a series of complexations. We got the inspiration from iGEM Imperial College 2010. | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 10 September 2012
August
Week 31 • Week 32 • Week 33 • Week 34 • Week 35Week 31: July 30th to August 5th
Goal- Know if there is a basal production of Cya
- Determine modeling for the receptor
-
There is no wild type in the experiments, but thanks to the glucose we can say that there is no basal production of Gfp/Cya (it is the same because they are regulated by the same promotor.
The problem with the receptor model is that we have a lot of equations and thus too much parameters (16). After a meeting with our advisors we decided to simplify the equations and chose a different model.
For the deterministic model of the receptor, we chose to model reactions of the receptor behavior by a series of complexations. We got the inspiration from iGEM Imperial College 2010.
The graphs obtained weren't satisfying so we decided to review the parameters values.
