Denitrogenation

Why Focus On Nitrogen Bioremediation?

The removal of nitrogen heterocycles from the petroleum tailings ponds is important for both of the main goals of the OSCAR project. Since nitrogen containing compounds lower the quality and stability of fuel (Katzer & Sivasubramanian, 1979) , their presence would be detrimental to the usefulness of the hydrocarbons OSCAR could create. The presence of nitrogen compounds in our products also hinders our environmental goals as they have been shown to undergo radical changes, yielding highly genotoxic byproducts (Xu et al., 2006). The combination of these two factors makes the removal of nitrogen very important to the success of OSCAR.

Our Model Compounds

Carbazole was chosen as the model compound to study nitrogen containing heterocycles as it accounts for about 70% of nitrogen by mass in petroleum tailings ponds, as well as the fact that it is considered one of the more difficult to degrade (Morales, 2010). A pathway that is capable of degrading carbazole could also have the ability to degrade many other types of nitrogen containing compounds found in the tailings ponds.

Model compounds used to test the ability of our system to remove nitrogen containing compounds.

How Are We Going To Accomplish This?

We identified a Pseudomonas genus that is capable of converting carbazole into cathecol with the hope that it would also be able to act on similar nitrogen heterocycles. This is accomplished thorugh an enzymatic pathway containing carbazole-1,9-dioxygenase (carA) and an enzyme called anthranilate 1,2-dioxygenase. carA is a 4 part enzyme encoded by three genes: carA, carB and carC. It selectively cleaves the first C-N bond in a nitrogen containing ring structure, converting carbazole into 2'-aminobiphenyl-2,3-diol (Xu et al, 2006,Morales, 2010). After this step, anthranilate 1,2-dioxygenase enzyme, encoded by the ant operon removes nitrogen from the structure (Diaz, 2010).

Action of the carA enzyme complex.

Does it work?

Upon obtaining the carbazole-degrading pseudomonas strain, we wanted to validate that this approach was valid. We performed an initial carbazole degradation assay where we incubated a pseudomonas culture with carbazole and monitored degradation over time. Our detailed protocol can be found

here.

2 options for the final step in the pathway.

Our Constructs

The carA genes have been biobricked individually into an operon under the control of a TetR promoter (BBa_J13002), with ribosome binding sites (BBa_B0034) inserted in front of each gene. The carAd gene was given a silent mutation to eliminate an illegal NotI site in the native sequence. The ant genes were biobricked as a whole operon with native ribosome binding sites in between each gene, also downstream of a TetR promoter. The AmdA gene was also biobricked downstream of a TetR promoter and ribosome binding site.

Genetic circuits for nitrogen removal. 2 operons and an additional gene have been biobricked together under 1 TetR promoter each.

Using these constructs above 3 test circuits can be built. The carA operon is necessary for all three since it is the only way of accomplishing the first step in the pathway, however the AmdA and ant genes can both be used for the second step. This allows the construction of circuits which can independently test the ability of both systems to perform the final step of the pathway, as well as testing them together to see if having two pathways available makes the system significantly more efficient.

3 "superconstructs" to be tested for their nitrogen removal ability.

Carbazole loss demonstrated after culturing with Pseudomonas sp. LD2, the source of the car and ant genes.

What Have We Shown So Far?