Team:SUSTC-Shenzhen-A/RFC test

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{Template:SUSTC_A2}} <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .sidebar_box_woframe { margin-bottom: 20px; } .sidebar_box { width: 260px; padding: 0; } .sidebar_box_top { wi...")
Line 163: Line 163:
        <tr>
        <tr>
          <td valign="top">
          <td valign="top">
-
  <p class="title"><strong>Ways leading to a standardized bio-engineered world</strong></p>
+
  <p class="title"><strong></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
-
<p class="title1">&nbsp;&nbsp;Biosearch</p>
+
<p class="title1">Ways leading to a standardized bio-engineered world</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
-
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;The era of Partsregistry on mobile phone has arrived! With BioSearch on your iPhone, you can now check biobricks and partsregistry in the seminar room; You can design your genetic circuits when you are waiting for a bus! BioSearch is fully interacting with Partsregistry( http://partsregistry.org ) and has all parts information of Partsregistry database with enhanced user-friendly interface.</p>
+
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;In 2003, the first attempt to make a synthetic biology a discipline that everyone can share about it was made. After the appearance of the first BioBrick(tm), the concept about standardization had been widely accepted. And it is a trend in synthetic biology now. </p>
 +
  <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Thanks to the standardization, biologists have developed many useful tools with the help of the standardized parts, the BioBricks. These BioBricks really contribute a lot to the research field. And they make easier for researchers to communicate with each other under the same technical standards. Due to the convenience of BioBricks, thousands of BioBricks have been created and introduced during these years. Thus the database containing these BioBricks is getting larger and larger.</p>
 +
  <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;But here comes the problem. Since every one can share their BioBricks, sometimes the information of the BioBricks are incomplet when they submit. So it becomes hard for users to search for a BioBrick that they want. Although there is an RFC, RFC 52 already, but we are not satisfied. Because of the generl description of it, the database of the BioBricks is still a mess. So we want to create a new RFC to replace RFC 52.</p>
 +
  <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We want to establish an RFC to describe the minimum information for a qualified BioBrick. We listed the minimum information a BioBrick should have, and gave a short description for each of them. Especially, we want to qualify the classification of BioBricks. All the BioBricks should be organized, so that users can search for it easily.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
-
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;BioSearch has a powerful search engine. Users can search parts and devices by type, by category, by keywords, etc. Our online survey shows that BioSearch has major improvement in search result ranking. In addition, our iPhone App has new functions including sharing, rating, adding bookmarks and downloading to local system. These new functions shall promote the commuting and sharing between synthetic biologists. The BioSearch is going to be available on Apple Store and is free to use. </p>
+
<p class="title1">The current problem</p>
 +
<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;Informations are not complete in partsregistry.org</strong></p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When the partsregistry.org was established at first, it is worth to be called the authority of the BioBricks. But as time goes by, more and more BioBricks are added in, now partsregistry.org becomes less satisfy. Information of many BioBricks are incomplete, some even wrong. Because every one can submit one's BioBrick as long as one logs in, many information is informal since the website doesn't examine the information users submit. This would waste resource as well as mess up the database.</p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Moreover, the layout of the website becomes more unclear as the database becomes larger and larger. For example, the Catlog. In this page, BioBricks are classified according to many different criteria. But the interface style in one section is far different from it in another section. Sometimes it is the description of a project, sometimes it becomes BioBrick list. A large list will be prsented in front of users with hundreds of BioBricks, but no search tool is available for users to search for the BioBrick that they really want. All of these would increase the difficulty for users to find the information that they want. For example, in the following figure, no list for Translational units can be found while others have long lists.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
-
<p class="title1">&nbsp;&nbsp;Biodesign</p>
+
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b5/Problem1.jpg" align="center"></p>
-
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Our second project, BioDesign, is a graphics editing application specific to synthetic biology for both iPhone and iPad. BioDesign is based on previous iGEM software named Tinker Cell and was elaborately improved to adapt to mobile platform. It provides hundreds of biobrick icons as well as lots of fancy functions including dragging graphics, drawing curves and automatically connecting figures with corresponding arrows. With BioSearch, users can draw biochemical reaction schematics anywhere they want and share their drawings with friends. BioDesign will be available online very soon!</p>
+
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
-
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
+
<p>This BioBrick is totally useless but it is still on the BioBrick list. This shows that the uploading of BioBricks should be standardized.</p>
-
 
+
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e0/Problem2.jpg"align="center"></p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
 +
<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;Informations are not useful in database</strong></p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We got a database that contains all the information about all the BioBricks. In this database, every BioBrick has 40 properties, they are:</p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/6d/Properties_list.png"></p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;With these long list, no nobody has the patience to look through them all. Indeed many properties are rubbish. Look at the property No.34-No.37, they are completely useless because they are apparently not a part of information of a BioBrick. Another example is property No.14, specified_scar_u_list. This property is NULL, which means it contains no information, for nearly all the BioBricks. We draw a histogram to demonstrate the percentage of unqualified and qualified BioBricks.</p>
  <p class="title">Sponsor</p>
  <p class="title">Sponsor</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

Revision as of 08:45, 23 September 2012

  

Ways leading to a standardized bio-engineered world

  

  

    In 2003, the first attempt to make a synthetic biology a discipline that everyone can share about it was made. After the appearance of the first BioBrick(tm), the concept about standardization had been widely accepted. And it is a trend in synthetic biology now.

    Thanks to the standardization, biologists have developed many useful tools with the help of the standardized parts, the BioBricks. These BioBricks really contribute a lot to the research field. And they make easier for researchers to communicate with each other under the same technical standards. Due to the convenience of BioBricks, thousands of BioBricks have been created and introduced during these years. Thus the database containing these BioBricks is getting larger and larger.

    But here comes the problem. Since every one can share their BioBricks, sometimes the information of the BioBricks are incomplet when they submit. So it becomes hard for users to search for a BioBrick that they want. Although there is an RFC, RFC 52 already, but we are not satisfied. Because of the generl description of it, the database of the BioBricks is still a mess. So we want to create a new RFC to replace RFC 52.

    We want to establish an RFC to describe the minimum information for a qualified BioBrick. We listed the minimum information a BioBrick should have, and gave a short description for each of them. Especially, we want to qualify the classification of BioBricks. All the BioBricks should be organized, so that users can search for it easily.

  

The current problem

  Informations are not complete in partsregistry.org

    When the partsregistry.org was established at first, it is worth to be called the authority of the BioBricks. But as time goes by, more and more BioBricks are added in, now partsregistry.org becomes less satisfy. Information of many BioBricks are incomplete, some even wrong. Because every one can submit one's BioBrick as long as one logs in, many information is informal since the website doesn't examine the information users submit. This would waste resource as well as mess up the database.

    Moreover, the layout of the website becomes more unclear as the database becomes larger and larger. For example, the Catlog. In this page, BioBricks are classified according to many different criteria. But the interface style in one section is far different from it in another section. Sometimes it is the description of a project, sometimes it becomes BioBrick list. A large list will be prsented in front of users with hundreds of BioBricks, but no search tool is available for users to search for the BioBrick that they really want. All of these would increase the difficulty for users to find the information that they want. For example, in the following figure, no list for Translational units can be found while others have long lists.

  

    

  

This BioBrick is totally useless but it is still on the BioBrick list. This shows that the uploading of BioBricks should be standardized.

    

  

  Informations are not useful in database

    We got a database that contains all the information about all the BioBricks. In this database, every BioBrick has 40 properties, they are:

  

    With these long list, no nobody has the patience to look through them all. Indeed many properties are rubbish. Look at the property No.34-No.37, they are completely useless because they are apparently not a part of information of a BioBrick. Another example is property No.14, specified_scar_u_list. This property is NULL, which means it contains no information, for nearly all the BioBricks. We draw a histogram to demonstrate the percentage of unqualified and qualified BioBricks.

Sponsor

  

  SUSTC Education Fundation

  

  Huarun Gas 华润燃气

  

  We appreciate helps from many faculties and staffers in SUSTC.

  They are Qinshi Zhu, Qin Ye, Wei Han, xuexian wu, Lingjun Wang, Cuiqiong Pang, Jing Zhang, Yun Jiao, Chaoyang Zhu, Yan Zeng and many others.

  Your support is our driving force!

Footbar.jpg