Team:Groningen/Construct
From 2012.igem.org
Emeraldo88 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
<p class="margin"> | <p class="margin"> | ||
We use our <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> backbone (BBa_K818000) that has <i>sacA</i> and a chloramphenicol resistance gene for chromosomal integration and antibiotic screening of transformants respectively. This backbone also has <i>E. coli</i> origin of replication, so it can be amplified inside <i>E. coli</i>. <br><br><br> | We use our <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> backbone (BBa_K818000) that has <i>sacA</i> and a chloramphenicol resistance gene for chromosomal integration and antibiotic screening of transformants respectively. This backbone also has <i>E. coli</i> origin of replication, so it can be amplified inside <i>E. coli</i>. <br><br><br> | ||
- | |||
+ | <z3><i>Update!</i></z3><br> | ||
+ | After the European regional jamboree, we were back in the lab to build our constructs in the <A HREF="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/in_development"><FONT COLOR=#ff6700>development page</FONT></A> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
<div class="cte"> | <div class="cte"> | ||
<div class="ctd"> | <div class="ctd"> |
Revision as of 12:27, 26 October 2012
Our construct idea is simple and effective: there will be a production of pigment under the regulation of a rotten-meat reactive promoter. When Bacillus subtilis senses the volatiles from the rotten meat, the rotten meat promoter becomes active thus allowing the production of downstream genes. We placed pigment genes under the control of the promoter so that the pigment would be produced when the promoter is activated.
We use our Bacillus subtilis backbone (BBa_K818000) that has sacA and a chloramphenicol resistance gene for chromosomal integration and antibiotic screening of transformants respectively. This backbone also has E. coli origin of replication, so it can be amplified inside E. coli.
After the European regional jamboree, we were back in the lab to build our constructs in the development page
1.)
SboA-AmilGFP is strongly expressed in E. coli, on plate and in liquid culture, at normal growth conditions. On plate, the yellow colour is less visible compared to the cell pellet in liquid culture.
2)
sboA-AmilGFP was shown to be very weakly expressed in Bacillus subtilis on LB plate (faint color formation after 2 days). This is probably due to the leakiness of the promoter. We tested the expression of sboA-AmilGFP in B. subtilis subjected to volatiles from spoiled meat using the same setup as we used for the microarray. Firstly, we inoculated B. subtilisSboA-AmilGFP and B. subtilisWildtype from plate into flasks of Luria Broth subjected to
To check whether the difference in color was not the result of the promoter activation by the presence of meat in general, we also compared the growth of B. subtilis sboA-AmilGFP strain subjected to fresh meat and rotten meat. We grew the strain in Luria Broth in the microarray setup for 12 hours and measured OD (600 nm), absorbance (395 nm) and assayed the color of the cells when pelleted. Below you can see the results: while grown without meat volatiles and with fresh meat volatiles, our device strain still produces yellow color. The color was produced faster and in a larger amount when the device strain was subjected to volatiles from spoiling meat.
AmilCP is expressed less strongly in Bacillus subtilis than AmilGFP. On plate, not induced by volatiles, a faint blue-greyish color is visible after 5 days of incubation. In liquid culture, it is not visible without induction by spoiled meat volatiles.
However, after placing Bacillus subtilis in our sticker and exposing the sticker to rotten meat volatiles, it turned into a clear purple color. See the sticker page for more information.