"
Team:Groningen/parts fail
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Emeraldo88 (Talk | contribs) |
Emeraldo88 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><z3>Remarks</z3></td> | <td><z3>Remarks</z3></td> | ||
| - | <td> | + | <td>After discovering that we did not receive these BioBrick as described in the registry, we took initiative to make our own <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> backbone to accommodate our project's needs. This unexpected BioBricks costs us some time to reconstruct our backbone plan, but in the end we were able to come up to a new backbone plan, the BBa_K818000. |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 26 September 2012
| Name: | Gram-positive Shuttle Vector for Chromosomal Integration |
| Intended Purpose: | Plasmid backbone for cloning in Bacillus subtilis |
| Testing Protocol: | Restriction analysis (dual cut with EcoRI and PstI) |
| Results: | The restriction pattern showed that this biobrick is not as described in the parts registry. The cut plasmid is not a single band and shorter than the expected size. |
| Gel Pic |
|
| Name: | Multi-host vector pTG262 converted to BioBrick vector |
| Intended Purpose: | Plasmid backbone for cloning in Bacillus subtilis |
| Testing Protocol: | Restriction analysis (single cut) and restriction analysis (dual cut) |
| Results: | The restriction enzymes cut at illegal site(s) |
| Gel Pic |
|
| After discovering that we did not receive these BioBrick as described in the registry, we took initiative to make our own Bacillus subtilis backbone to accommodate our project's needs. This unexpected BioBricks costs us some time to reconstruct our backbone plan, but in the end we were able to come up to a new backbone plan, the BBa_K818000. |
Our sponsors:
