Team:Groningen/Sticker
From 2012.igem.org
Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<font color=#FF6700><b>Measurements</b></font> <br> | <font color=#FF6700><b>Measurements</b></font> <br> | ||
- | Needs a visible feedback for the human eye and should easy to understand for the customer. <br> | + | Needs a visible feedback system for the human eye and should easy to understand for the customer. <br> |
The product should keep the visible feedback stored in the material. <br> | The product should keep the visible feedback stored in the material. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <z3> | + | <z3>Development design</z3> |
<p class="marginleft"> | <p class="marginleft"> | ||
- | For the development of the sticker, the PDCA (Plan Do Check Act) strategy was used to develop an ultimate device that the customer and environment | + | For the development of the sticker, the PDCA (Plan Do Check Act) strategy was used to develop an ultimate device that keeps track of the needs of the customer and the environment in the project design.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | The following | + | The following questions where raised: <br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
Who is your external customer?<br> | Who is your external customer?<br> | ||
- | The customer | + | The customer who is against food spoilage and customers that are willing to buy it.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
What value do you deliver to that customer?<br> | What value do you deliver to that customer?<br> | ||
- | A replacement for use by date and sell by date | + | A replacement for the "use by date and sell by date" system: a new indicator for when meat is getting spoiled.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
Who, in you iGEM group, delivers that value?<br> | Who, in you iGEM group, delivers that value?<br> | ||
- | The design engineers and | + | The design engineers and the biologists of iGEM Groningen 2012.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
How do they deliver that value?<br> | How do they deliver that value?<br> | ||
- | + | By doing research and creating a new indicator to predict when meat get spoiled.<br> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<z3>Material</z3> | <z3>Material</z3> | ||
<p class="marginleft"> | <p class="marginleft"> | ||
- | Two different materials | + | Two different materials were carefully chosen for our final product. At first, the outer bag should be resistant enough to support the bacteria inside the sticker and give strength to the pressure that is applied by the customer. Its physical properties and characteristics should not be affected when too much pressure or deformation is applied on the sticker. It should be light and small for easy removing and placing in the meat package. |
- | + | Second, the case should be made from a light material and the surface should be flat to provide grip and avoid sharp edges or other risks for the user.<br> | |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Taking into account all these characteristics we considered three materials for the sticker: polyetheen ( | + | Taking into account all these characteristics, we considered three materials for the sticker: polyetheen (sandwich bag), Polyvinyl chloride (cling film) and Polymethylpentene (PMP) als commonly known as TPX. We chose TPX as the material for the outer layer of the sticker, because this material fulfills all the requirements mentioned above. <br> |
- | In addition, | + | In addition, we looked for another material needed for the inner compartment of the sticker, that separates the medium from the spores untill the customer wants to use it. At first, polyvinyl chloride turned out to be too weak for the outer layer of the sticker because it is easily broken. However, these properties are very suitable for the needed the breakable inner compartment of the sticker. Not a lot of pressure or strength is needed to break the inner compartment, which is handy for the customer when handling the sticker.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 14:23, 24 September 2012