Team:Groningen/Safety

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Safety in the lab)
 
(23 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{HeaderGroningen2012}}
{{HeaderGroningen2012}}
-
==Safety in the lab==
 
-
 
-
Working with GMO’s and microbiology is obligated to be done under safe conditions. The European union made a directive that insures the safety for the researcher, the laboratory and the environment. The directive however is very comprehensive and very detailed. To make a good and safe work environment the Rijksuniverisiteit Groningen(RUG) made an ’Administratieve organisatie GGOs’, this is based on the EU directive ‘98/81/EG’ and was approved by the ministry of Infrastructure & Environment from the Dutch government. The government is in turn advised by the COGEM, the scientific advise organ of the government. The COGEM provides scientific advice to the government on risks to human health and the environment of the production and use of GMOs. It also informs the government of ethical and societal issues linked to genetic modification.
 
-
 
-
[[File:Groningen2012 EH 20120830 safety scheme.png|600px|center]]
 
-
 
-
Students studying microbiology at the university of Groningen are informed on safety aspects of microbiology from the beginning of their study career. They are required to get a VMT (Veilige microbriele technieken, translated: safe microbiological techniques) certificate that demonstrates that they are able to safely work with microbiology and GMOs. The bases for this certificate are the 10 commandments for safe microbiological techniques which are derived from the Administratieve organisatie GGOs. Every iGEM member from our team is required to know these rules and uphold them when working in the lab. These commandments are 10 rules which ensure safe work environment for  researchers on a daily basis. Most of the team members that work in the lab have a background in microbiology which they learned at the RUG. These persons have the VMT certificate and know how to work safely in the lab. Team members without this background and who work in the lab have been instructed with these rules and learned how to work safely.
 
-
 
-
 
-
===10 COMMANDMENTS for Safe Microbiological Techniques===
 
-
 
-
*1. All VMT related work can only be performed by those people that have permission from the Biological Safety Officer (BVF). Work according to the rules, even if you believe there is no apparent risk.
 
-
 
-
*2. During VMT related work all doors and windows have to be closed. Verify that insects and other pests are not present in the lab.
 
-
 
-
*3. Wear a closed laboratory coat. Do not take this labcoat outside the VMT area unless it is absolutely necessary for the experiment. In case of a contamination of the labcoat, sterilize the labcoat first, with bleach or by autoclaving, before washing.
 
-
 
-
*4. Clean and sterilize spills immediately. Report serious contamination immediately to the BVF.
 
-
 
-
*5. It is absolutely prohibited to eat, drink or smoke, or to have cups, plates, mugs or silverware in the VMT area.
 
-
 
-
*6. Pipetting by mouth is prohibited. Used pipettes are collected in a disinfecting solution.
 
-
 
-
*7. Prevent aerosols. These may be created by -splashing drops; -pouring of liquids; - discharging pipettes; -opening of moist plugs; - using inoculating loops that are too hot. Use needles only if there is absolutely no alternative.
 
-
 
-
*8. Glassware and instruments that have been in contact with GMO's (Genetically Modified Organisms, GGO’s in Dutch) have to be sterilized or disinfected before being washed, reused or discarded. Biological waste has to be collected in autoclavable plastic bags, which are autoclaved before discarding (use indicator tape to demonstrate that the bag was autoclaved).
 
-
 
-
*9. Wash hands with soap and water after work and before leaving the room. Bench surface areas have to be cleaned and disinfected daily. Keep area clean and organized.
 
-
 
-
*10. Record the general nature of the work clearly in a lab journal.
 
-
 
-
===More to consider===
 
-
* Ethidium bromide is a carcinogenic compound that we used when working with agarose gels. To ensure our safety, we created a specific ethidium bromide region in our lab; in this area was clearly indicated that it is obligatory to use appropriate gloves and keep all the contaminated equipment in the EthBr area. The toxic wasted is disposed in the appropriated manner according the rule and regulations uphold in the laboratories of the university.
 
-
 
-
===Micro-organisms involved===
 
-
 
-
* We worked with bad meat, a versatile environment for the growth of ''Pseudomonas, Salmonella, E. coli'' and other harmful bacteria. In order to work as safely as possible, we performed our rotten meat experiments in closed bottles and used our flow cabinets and procedure masks when taking meat samples. All of the meat was assumed to be biological waste, so we put everything in the autoclave to ensure that our researchers worked as safe as possible. You can read more about food safety in the [[Team:Groningen/Safety#Food_safety | dedicated chapter]] below.
 
-
 
-
* ''Bacillus subtilis'' - For proof of principle we used B. subtilis strain 168, as safe strain widely used in labs. For our final product we want to use a  food grade B. subtilis strain as Bacillus subtilis natto. Considered as safe as Lactococcus lactis in yoghurt.
 
-
 
-
* ''Escherichia coli'' strain DH5α- Standard laboratory bacterium, widely used as chassis for synthetic biology. This bacterium is considered moderately safe, however, may cause infections and therefore has to be treated carefully.
 
-
 
-
==Genetical engineering and safety==
 
-
===Public safety===
 
-
During our project discussions and our presentations to the public, it became clear that the association of meat and bacteria being close to each other, is not easily accepted. That’s why decided to take extra care when we designed our indication sticker, to be absolutely sure there is no possibility that our Bacillus or its spores are able to come in the environment or on the preserved meat, possibly endangering the public and environment. We consulted specialized companies to participate and contribute in our project using their knowledge of materials. A good idea for preventing introduction of GMO’s into the environment, is the use of nano pores. The material for this “sticker” is TPX® Polymethylpentene, a strong polymer that is will ensure no bacteria will not come in contact with the meat, but still allows the volatiles to reach the bacteria. This material is approved by FDA-standards and EU-food-standards.
 
-
 
-
But not only the sticker design ensures the safety of the public, also the nutrient composition in the sticker ensures Bacillus will only germinate and grow when the sticker is still intact. And even when our Bacillus is exposed to an environment that is favorable for growth, the production of the pigment will ensure that the bacterium kills itself, because the pigment is toxic for Bacillus. Further the strain we will use in our final product is considered a food-grade strain. The genetic modification done to this strain only consist of adding of a plasmid containing promoter regions from the genome of B. subtilis and parts from other biobricks that were found to have no dangerous effects for humans.
 
-
 
-
The find out more on the effect of our product on the public we want to contact the voedsel en waren authoriteit of the Dutch government.
 
-
 
-
===Environmental safety===
 
-
Our final product does not contain an antibiotic resistance marker. This is a main concern for environmental safety. Even in a worst case scenario, if our food warden bacterium is released into the environment, the plasmid will not provide an advantage for survival above the natural biodiversity. Nor could any genes potentially transferred to other bacteria give those bacteria the ability to become virulent or dominant over other bacteria, which in turn could endanger the biodiversity.  The ability to produce a pigment will waste valuable energy of the bacteria and could in some cases be toxic for the cell. The strain we will use for our final product will also not threaten the biodiversity in the environment, because this strain a natural strain and already in the environment.
 
-
For more insights of the safety aspects of our product we invited prof. Elsas, a member of COGEM and expert on the environmental aspect of biosafety. He will give us a lecture on the 6th of September
 
-
 
-
===The BioBricks===
 
-
We did not found  urgent  safety  issues with our biobricks. The promoters were taken from the genome of B.subtilis 168 and are natural gene parts. Furthermore the other parts of our biobricks are parts taken from the biobricks in the registry. Also final product does not contain an antibiotic resistance marker. 
 
-
 
-
===The biosafety group===
 
-
Every research facility has staff responsible for the safety of the labs where people work with GMO. The Rijksuniveriteit of Groningen is no exception. There are four  biological safety officers each charged with a different aspects of safety (Site manager, Microorganisms, ecology and plants, animal safety) We invited Dr. Juke Lolkema, the safety officer in charge the safety in working with microorganisms, to give a lecture about GMOs and safety in the lab. Dr. Lolkema is responsible for the maintenance of safe microbial techniques in the whole life science building (Linneausborg). During this lecture we asked about the safety aspects of our project. He raised an issue we needed to address: how to kill the bacteria after use? The pigment product was observed to be toxic for certain bacteria we need to test whether is this the case for B. subtilis nato. If so the pigment will serve as a kill switch and kills the bacteria after use.  If the pigment does not have a toxic effect on this strain of B. subtilis, we want to incorporate a kill switch in the plasmid that is activated after pigment production. In either case after pigment production the bacteria will be killed. 
 
-
 
-
==Food safety==
 
-
For our project, we did some research on food safety and the European regulations on this subject, especially around our subject, minced meat (results of research will follow). We took some of this regulations into practice by measuring the Total Aerobic Microbial Count of meat left at room temperature for different times. You can see the results [[Team:Groningen/Wetwork#When_is_food_rotten.3F | here]].
 
-
[[File:RR_20120807_TAMCpic.jpg|600px|center]]
 
-
 
-
==Safety issues and the future of the iGEM competition==
 
-
 
-
Find an alternative system for the antibiotic resistance markers used nowadays (in the BioBricks). This could be a pigment instead of cloning bacteria with antibiotic resistance. By horizontal gene transfer these resistance genes can be passed to other bacterial species. 
 
-
 
-
 
-
Use this page to answer the questions on the  [[Safety | safety page]].
 
 +
<html>
 +
<head>
 +
<style>
 +
z1 {
 +
font-size:18pt;
 +
line-height:21pt;
 +
color:white;
 +
}
 +
z5 {
 +
font-size:14pt;
 +
font-weight: bold;
 +
color: rgb(255,103,0);
 +
}
 +
.ctd {
 +
width: 180px;
 +
text-align: center;
 +
background: #000;
 +
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,0.3);
 +
padding: 5px ;
 +
margin: 30px auto;
 +
color: #FFF;
 +
}
 +
.cte {
 +
width: 210px;
 +
text-align: center;
 +
background: #000;
 +
padding-right:10px;
 +
padding-left:10px;
 +
margin: 0 auto;
 +
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,0.3);
 +
color: #FFF;
 +
}
 +
p{
 +
font-size:12pt;
 +
line-height:14pt;
 +
margin-right:150px;
 +
margin-left:150px;
 +
color: white;
 +
}
 +
a.inlink{
 +
font-size: 12pt;
 +
                line-height: 12pt;
 +
                color: rgb(255,103,0);
 +
}
 +
</style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
<div class="cte">
 +
<div class="ctd">
 +
<z1 >General Safety</z1>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
With the emergence of the field of Synthetic Biology, certain ethical questions must be considered.
 +
The debate on the safety and ethics of synthetic biology is still ongoing, and it is therefore no surprise
 +
that every iGEM team is obliged to consider these issues. The iGEM organization asks questions about the safety
 +
aspect of a team's project, pertaining to the safety in the lab, the environment, and the public. We tried to
 +
answer these questions to the best of our ability. Most of our team members have lab experience and are aware
 +
of the safety regulations pertaining to working in a lab with GMOs, but we decided to explore the safety issue
 +
more in depth. In order to do so, we invited two authorities to give lectures and to assist in considering the
 +
need of safety during our iGEM project: Dr. J.S. Lolkema, biological safety officer at the Rijksuniversiteit of
 +
Groningen (RUG), as well as Prof. Dr. ir.  J.D. van Elsas, member of the Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
We divided our safety page into four different sections. On the first page we focus on
 +
<a class="inlink" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/10com">safety in the lab</a>,
 +
we  address the rules and regulations of lab work at the RUG pertaining to researcher safety and all things concerning
 +
the lab such as: the biobricks, microorganisms and the biosafety group.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
On the  <a class="inlink" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/publicsafety">public safety page</a>
 +
we explore the safety of our sticker design and the public perception of the Food Warden system.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
On the <a class="inlink" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/environment">environmental safety page</a>
 +
we elaborate on the risk and hazards of the our genetic modification. Furthermore we address possible effects
 +
on the environment and share our thoughts on developing a system to kill the Food Warden bacterium if it were
 +
to be released into the environment or after use.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
On our last safety page we discuss <a class="inlink" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/foodsafety">food safety</a>.
 +
We answer questions like: "How does one define rotten meat?" and show the importance of prevention of eating spoiled meat.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
There is one question from the iGEM headquarters which was hard to put into one of our safety sections, which we would like to address here.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<z5>"Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions?
 +
How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?"</z5>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
We think it is important to find an alternative system for the antibiotic resistance markers used nowadays in the
 +
BioBrick system. Such a selection marker could be a harmless pigment, or other systems such as the widely used
 +
Red-White or LacZ screening methods. This takes away the risk of spreading antibiotic resistance by horizontal gene transfer.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
When using proper lab techniques, safety measures, and of course common sense, a lot of possibly dangerous situations
 +
can be avoided. However, this is not always as straightforward as it seems. Every iGEM team that does wetwork has its
 +
own lab in the university, just as we do. Therefore, a random safety inspection by the iGEM organization would ideally
 +
be a good way to check if everyone does meet the basic safety regulations. However, since iGEM is a huge competition,
 +
we understand it would be troublesome to send a delegation to travel all over the world to do this. Nonetheless it could
 +
be an option to send iGEM judges or supervisors to neighboring universities, or make it obligated that iGEM teams are
 +
visited by an official Safety Officer.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
</p>
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
{{Template:SponsorsGroningen2012}}
{{Template:SponsorsGroningen2012}}

Latest revision as of 21:21, 26 September 2012





General Safety


With the emergence of the field of Synthetic Biology, certain ethical questions must be considered. The debate on the safety and ethics of synthetic biology is still ongoing, and it is therefore no surprise that every iGEM team is obliged to consider these issues. The iGEM organization asks questions about the safety aspect of a team's project, pertaining to the safety in the lab, the environment, and the public. We tried to answer these questions to the best of our ability. Most of our team members have lab experience and are aware of the safety regulations pertaining to working in a lab with GMOs, but we decided to explore the safety issue more in depth. In order to do so, we invited two authorities to give lectures and to assist in considering the need of safety during our iGEM project: Dr. J.S. Lolkema, biological safety officer at the Rijksuniversiteit of Groningen (RUG), as well as Prof. Dr. ir. J.D. van Elsas, member of the Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification.

We divided our safety page into four different sections. On the first page we focus on safety in the lab, we address the rules and regulations of lab work at the RUG pertaining to researcher safety and all things concerning the lab such as: the biobricks, microorganisms and the biosafety group.

On the public safety page we explore the safety of our sticker design and the public perception of the Food Warden system.

On the environmental safety page we elaborate on the risk and hazards of the our genetic modification. Furthermore we address possible effects on the environment and share our thoughts on developing a system to kill the Food Warden bacterium if it were to be released into the environment or after use.

On our last safety page we discuss food safety. We answer questions like: "How does one define rotten meat?" and show the importance of prevention of eating spoiled meat.


There is one question from the iGEM headquarters which was hard to put into one of our safety sections, which we would like to address here.

"Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?"

We think it is important to find an alternative system for the antibiotic resistance markers used nowadays in the BioBrick system. Such a selection marker could be a harmless pigment, or other systems such as the widely used Red-White or LacZ screening methods. This takes away the risk of spreading antibiotic resistance by horizontal gene transfer.

When using proper lab techniques, safety measures, and of course common sense, a lot of possibly dangerous situations can be avoided. However, this is not always as straightforward as it seems. Every iGEM team that does wetwork has its own lab in the university, just as we do. Therefore, a random safety inspection by the iGEM organization would ideally be a good way to check if everyone does meet the basic safety regulations. However, since iGEM is a huge competition, we understand it would be troublesome to send a delegation to travel all over the world to do this. Nonetheless it could be an option to send iGEM judges or supervisors to neighboring universities, or make it obligated that iGEM teams are visited by an official Safety Officer.


Our sponsors:

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Safety"