Team:SUSTC-Shenzhen-A/RFC draft
From 2012.igem.org
(Created page with "{{Template:SUSTC_A2}} <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .sidebar_box_woframe { margin-bottom: 20px; } .sidebar_box { width: 260px; padding: 0; } .sidebar_box_top { wi...") |
|||
Line 287: | Line 287: | ||
<p> Arend Slomp and David Ekkers “BBF RFC 52: Documentation of BioBrick parts” | <p> Arend Slomp and David Ekkers “BBF RFC 52: Documentation of BioBrick parts” | ||
Conboy et al. "Definitions and Measures of Performance for Standard Biological Parts" https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/31335</p><br/> | Conboy et al. "Definitions and Measures of Performance for Standard Biological Parts" https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/31335</p><br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <p> To see the PDF version of this RFC, please click <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/a/a9/Sustc_shenzhen_a_BBF_RFC_.pdf">here!!!!!</a></p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 09:18, 24 September 2012
BBF RFC#: The minimum information for a qualified BioBrick1. Purpose Since the information of many existing BioBricks is incomplete, thus the usage of the BioBricks will be affected. It is necessary to standardize the minimum information required for a qualified BioBrick. Furthermore this standardization will reduce the time to locate and find a BioBrick. So it is essential to create a default template of storing the information of BioBricks. 2. Relation to other BBF RFCs This BBF RFC is intended to replace the following standards: 3. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The BioBricks Foundation (2012). All Rights Reserved. 4. Minimum information for a BioBrick
To build a qualified BioBrick, the following information MUST be included: 4.1 Name of the BioBrick A BioBrick MUST contain a name given by the iGEM committee. A name example: BBa_I14050. 4.2 Fundamental type of the BioBrick The author of a BioBrick MUST assign the BioBrick a corresponding type. The choice has been limited by promoter, RBS, coding sequence, terminator, plasmid backbone and others. The choice ‘others’ means that the BioBrick is not a promoter, not a RBS, not coding sequence, not a terminator nor a plasmid backbone. The author can give the detail description following 4.3. 4.3 General description of the BioBrick A description is a MUST requirement for a qualified BioBrick. The function of the BioBrick SHOULD be written into the description if available. And characteristics as well as the physical properties and the best experiment environment are RECOMMENDED. Remember that any offended words or anything irrelevant to synthetic biology SHALL NOT be allowed. 4.4 Status of the BioBrick In order to let users clearly know whether the BioBrick is working or not the status of the BioBrick SHOULD be specified. And the choices of the status are recommended as the following: available, building, cancelled, deleted, missing, planning, sent, unavailable. 4.5 Categories that the BioBrick falls in Any BioBrick SHALL fall in at least one category in the following four categories below. The classification MUST be specified to the second level.
The form of the BioBrick category SHALL be like this:
// Chassis/ Yeast; 4.6 Author and contact information Every BioBrick MUST contain the names of the authors or designers. The contact information, for example the email address, is OPTIONAL. And the project information CAN be written into this part is the author(s) want(s). 4.7 Sequence and sequence length A BioBrick MUST has a specified sequence of base pairs (or single chain). And the sequence MUST be available. Although users can get the sequence length by counting base pairs, convenience will be improved is a sequence length is provided. 4.8 Creation date A BioBrick SHOULD contains a creation date that recorded the date when the BioBrick is created. This is a fundamental information for a BioBrick but not essential. 5. Author’s Contact Information Mubing Zhou, mubingzhou@gmail.com 6. Reference Arend Slomp and David Ekkers “BBF RFC 52: Documentation of BioBrick parts” Conboy et al. "Definitions and Measures of Performance for Standard Biological Parts" https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/31335 To see the PDF version of this RFC, please click here!!!!! |