"
Team:Paris Bettencourt/Overview
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
} | } | ||
| - | .thumbnail span{ /*CSS for enlarged image*/ | + | .thumbnail span { /*CSS for enlarged image*/ |
position: absolute; | position: absolute; | ||
padding: 5px; | padding: 5px; | ||
left: -5px; | left: -5px; | ||
| - | top : | + | top : 80px; |
border: none; | border: none; | ||
visibility: hidden; | visibility: hidden; | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 26 September 2012
- Main
- Team
- Project
- Achievements
- Human Practice
- Safety
- Notebook
- Attributions
Overview
Delay system
Restriction enzyme system
MAGE
Suicide system
Encapsulation
Synthetic import domain
Safety Questions
Safety Assessment
Toxin/anti-Toxin system.
Toxin/anti-Toxin system.
Toxin/anti-Toxin system.
Toxin/anti-Toxin system.
Toxin/anti-Toxin system.
Project Overview
Contents |
Objectives
Our project aims to:
- Raise the issue of biosafety, and advocate the discerning use of biosafety circuits in future iGEM projects as a requirement
- Evaluate the risk of HGT in different SynBio applications
- Develop a new, improved containment system to expand the range of environments where GEOs can be used safely.
To do so, we:
- Engaged the general public and scientific community through debate
- Raised the question about how we can regulate this practices
- Compiled a parts page of safety circuits in the registry
- Relied on three levels of containment :
- Physical containment with alginate capsules
- Semantic containment using an amber suppressor system
- An improved killswitch featuring delayed population-level suicide through complete genome degradation.
We strived to make our system as robust against mutations as possible.
General recommandation for a good killswitch device
|
Step 1
Step 2
Step 2.
Step 3
Step 3.
