Team:Paris Bettencourt/Overview

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 46: Line 46:
</style>
</style>
-
 
-
 
<div class="gallerycontainer">
<div class="gallerycontainer">
-
<a class="thumbnail" href="#thumb"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1c/SemanticContainment.png" width="100px" height="66px" border="0" /><span><img src="/wiki/images/8/8f/Toxin3aPB12.gif" width="300px" /><br />Simply beautiful.</span></a>
+
<a class="thumbnail" href="#thumb"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1c/SemanticContainment.png" width="100px" border="0" /><span><img src="/wiki/images/8/8f/Toxin3aPB12.gif" width="300px" /><br />Simply beautiful.</span></a>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 14:23, 26 September 2012


iGEM Paris Bettencourt 2012


Project Overview

Contents

Objectives

Our project aims to:

  • Raise the issue of biosafety, and advocate the discerning use of biosafety circuits in future iGEM projects as a requirement
  • Evaluate the risk of HGT in different SynBio applications
  • Develop a new, improved containment system to expand the range of environments where GEOs can be used safely.

To do so, we:

  • Engaged the general public and scientific community through debate
  • Raised the question about how we can regulate this practices
  • Compiled a parts page of safety circuits in the registry
  • Relied on three levels of containment :
    1. Physical containment with alginate capsules
    2. Semantic containment using an amber suppressor system
    3. An improved killswitch featuring delayed population-level suicide through complete genome degradation.

We strived to make our system as robust against mutations as possible.

General recommandation for a good killswitch device

  • bla
  • blo
  • blu

Step 1

Step 2

Step 2.

Step 3

Step 3.












Copyright (c) 2012 igem.org. All rights reserved. Design by FCT.