Team:NTU-Taida/PEPDEX

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(obstacles)
 
(178 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Header}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Navbar}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Sidebar}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/ContentStart}}
+
__FORCETOC__{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Header}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Navbar}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Sidebar|Title=Overal Project}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/ContentStart}}
-
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/BSHero|Title=Project|Content=<p>Testing Hero</p>}}
+
-
== '''Overall project''' ==
+
-
In our project, we aim to utilize a microbe that responds to conditions in human body as an approach to administer smart peptide-based therapies. GLP-1, a human innate neuro-peptide for energy balance, is chosen to combat for obesity and metabolic syndrome. We engineer the non-pathogenic E. coli which senses fatty acids in intestines and secretes synthetic GLP-1. Appropriate signal peptides and penetratin are used to facilitate peptide secretion and intestinal uptake. Furthermore, we design a circuit with quorum sensing and double repressors, which aims to generate quick but sustainable responses and serves as an anti-noise filter. Plasmid stabilization modules including partition system and multimer resolution system are also incorporated to circumvent the undesirable loss or segregational instability of our artificial device. With this general concept of delivery of short peptide into human body, we can also target other human diseases with alternative circuit designs.
+
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/BSHero|Title=Overall Project|Content=}}
-
== Project Details==
+
==Introduction==
 +
There has been a wide array of peptides, either innate or synthetic, used as drugs or vaccine in combat of different diseases. For instance, insulin was synthesized and mass produced in bacteria; long, synthetic peptide vaccine has also brought to bedside to help treat patient with invasive cancers. (Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 May;8(5):351-60.) However, the delivery of the peptide into human body is a big issue, since it cannot be administered orally, and has a poor distribution and absorption as compared to small molecules drugs in human body. With the advent of biotechnology and the growing forum of synthetic biology, we try to engineer and finely design different circuits in bacteria, which can deliver peptides through epidermal, buccal, rectal, or enteral. As for a simple exemplification of our ultimate goal of microbial peptide delivery system, we choose GLP-1, the endogenous hormone as our delivery model. Our design features efficiency, quick response to the environment changes, and sustainable release of GLP-1. This is the first model of our peptide delivery system, and opens a new room for the synthetic biology in medicine applications.
-
=== '''Enteral delivery of neuro-peptide for weight and metabolic control''' ===
+
GLP-1, a human innate neuro-peptide for energy balance, is chosen to combat for obesity and metabolic syndrome. We engineer the non-pathogenic ''E. coli'' which senses fatty acids in intestines and secretes synthetic GLP-1. Appropriate signal peptides and penetratin are used to facilitate peptide secretion and intestinal uptake. Furthermore, we design a circuit with quorum sensing and double repressors, which aims to generate quick but sustainable responses and serves as an anti-noise filter. Plasmid stabilization modules including partition system and multimer resolution system are also incorporated to circumvent the undesirable loss or segregational instability of our artificial device. With this general concept of delivery of short peptide into human body, we can also target other human diseases with alternative circuit designs.
-
====Design====
+
-
CPP
+
-
[[File:https://www.dropbox.com/s/1lnt1d2uo401rz6/123.mov]]
+
-
fadR
+
 +
===Circuit===
-
[[FIle:FadR-DNA.png|400px]]
+
====Fat Extinguisher====
 +
The main circuit is designed to detect the presence of fatty acid in the intestinal environment and produce the peptide drug (GLP-1 in this case) and cell penetrating peptide (CPP) as response. There are two core systems: double repressors and quorum sensing, which aims to corroborate a quick responsive to fat ingestion and stable functioning circuit.
 +
We start the circuit with fatty acid sensor (fadR), which is followed by double repressor (tetR and LacI). The fadR is a novel promoter which can detect the presence of fatty acid; the double repressor tetR and LacI combine to make the circuit more stable and form a prominent threshold.  
 +
====Thermal Avenger====
 +
We designed a thermal sensitive promoter in our circuit to sense the change of temperature of ambient. The temperature sensitive repressor CI would dimerize in room temperature and suppress the expression of downward gene sequence; however, when the temperature rises, the dimer would break and lose the function of repression. As our experiment proves, the circuit works differently under room temperature from inside human body (37<sup>0</sup>C). As for application of the thermal sensitive device, first, we incorporate toxin and anti-toxin in our thermal promoter, which works as a self destructor. Second, we can utilize the thermal sensitive characteristic of the circuit to make a baseline secretion level of the GLP-1.
-
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/VideoTest}}
+
===Stability and Safety===
-
====Modeling====
+
Every genetically modified (GM) system that functions outside of the laboratories will face two major problems: system stability and safety! Without selective pressure, we have to deal with plasmid segregation instability, which may lead to a incomplete system due to loss of circuit pieces; to make our lab ''E. coli'' colonized bowel we have to use recA+ strains which may cause plasmid multimer. Our GM lab E. coli will also be in contact with many kinds of wild bacteria and is under the risk of horizontal gene transfer.<br />
-
====Results====
+
-
====Extension====
+
-
=== '''peptide2''' ===
 
-
====Background====
 
-
====Design====
 
-
====Modeling====
 
-
====Results====
 
-
====Extension====
 
-
=== '''Thermal promoter'''===
 
-
====Phs thermal promoter====
 
-
E. coli is pretty sensitive and responsive to temperature changes. We brought promoter Phs, located within dnaG, and transient induced to temperature upshift, to our circuit. As described by Wayne E. Talyor et al., Phs can forward upregulation of a series of proteins. The increase activity of Phs promoter is partially compatible with the increase synthesis of sigma factor. The quick respsonse of Phs is suitable since its the sigma factor synthesis peaks 10 minutes after the temperature upshift, and so does Phs RNA levels. The increase ratio before and after the temperature can be more than 20 folds. On particular note, Phs is lack of consensus region over -10 region, which explains its poor activity in 30 Celsuius degree. Thus, Phs is marked as a candidate in our circuit, which can only be functional after ingestion into human body.
 
-
====Modified promoter CI with CIts====
 
-
This circuit involves a thermosensitive CI promoter under the expression of a strong promoter, J23119, and is followed by a pCI promoter region and reporter of desire. The whole composite circuit is designed by Harvard iGEM team, 2008. Under conditions demonstrated before, its increase of reporter expression after temperature upshift is minimal (1.8 fold). And thus, we design novel pCI promoter region with alterer binding affinity to CIts repressor in search of better efficiency.
 
-
=='''Secretory System'''==
+
<!-- EOF -->
-
 
+
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/ContentEnd}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Footer|ActiveNavbar=Project, #nav-Project-Overview}}
-
Gram-negative bacteria have several ways to secrete their protein products, and these secretory
+
-
systems had been categorized into six types, from type I secretory system(T1SS) to type VI
+
-
secretory system(T6SS). Every type of system has its own unique character. Due to the product
+
-
we planned to produce, GLP-1 and CPP(penetratin), we decided to use Type II secretory system
+
-
(T2SS) for several reasons as following. First, T2SS are believed to be normally expressed in
+
-
Escherichia coli(E. coli.). Second, some T2SS(Sec pathway) are believed to be self-degrading
+
-
for their signal peptides. Third, some T2SS(Tat pathway) are believed to be capable of secreting
+
-
folded protein. In order to secrete protein by T2SS, you need to first decide which signal peptide
+
-
to attach to your protein. Then, the signal peptie will be recognized by either Sec, SRP or Tat
+
-
pathway to be transported to periplasm and throught a common transporter protein into the extracellular
+
-
environment.(figure 1)
+
-
 
+
-
After deciding which type of secretory system we would use, we started to look out for our signal
+
-
peptide candidate. We chose our three candicates based on several review papers (J. H. Choi et al, 2004)
+
-
and we found out the three original papers(2,3,4). Due to the limitation of time and money, we de novo
+
-
construct our signal peptides(SP) to be linked to our products(GLP-1 and CPP).(figure 2) We then constructed
+
-
them with constitutively-expressed promoter and RBS. With this construct done, in both DH5α and BL-21
+
-
strain, our E. coli. can be used to produce our target protein-signal peptide complex, also they can
+
-
be used to test if the signal peptide and secretory system really work. To sense those proteins the
+
-
E. coli. secreted, we used Dot-blotting and ELISA tests. The results are devided into two parts,
+
-
Dot-blotting and ELISA.
+
-
 
+
-
===Dot-blotting===
+
-
 
+
-
Dot-blotting is a technique for detecting target protein within a cell. We remodified the standard dot
+
-
blotting protocol to meet our needs. Our aim is to sense the protein the E. coli. secreted, so instead
+
-
of collecting and deviding the insoluble and soluble target protein within the bacteria, we sensed the
+
-
protein and compared the protein amount extracellularly and intracellularly.
+
-
 
+
-
Our first dot-blotting is for both practicing and condition optimization, so we strictly followed
+
-
standard protocol for comparing intracellular protin content.(figure)
+
-
 
+
-
===ELISA===
+
-
 
+
-
=='''Stability and safety'''==
+
-
 
+
-
Every GM system that will function outside lab will face two major problems:system stability and safety!
+
-
Without selective pressure ,we have to deal with plasmid instability ; to make our coli colonized bowel we have to use recA+ strains which may cause plasmid multimer. Our GM coli will also contact with many kinds of bacteria at the risk of horizontal gene transfer.
+
-
The following segment is our struggle against these obstacles.
+
-
=== '''Stability of delivery system''' ===
+
-
+
-
====Briefing====
+
-
<p>As our system will function outside the labrotory and human gut lack for antibiotic selection pressure, the vector stability is the critical point that determine whether our system is applicable or not. Inspired by natural plasmid & mobile gene element, we cope up with vector instability by incorporating <strong>partition system</strong>, <strong>Multimer resolution system</strong> and <strong>toxin antitoxin system</strong> these modules into our design.</p>
+
-
====obstacles====
+
-
Sources of plasmid instability:
+
-
<html>
+
-
<dl>
+
-
<dt>segregational instability</dt>
+
-
<dd>Plasmids are unevenly distributed inside bacterium, after cell division, some progeny might loss plasmid.
+
-
</dd>
+
-
<dt>burden effect</dt>
+
-
<dd>The plasmid free cells sure will grow better than those bearing plasmids because they don't have to spend energy/resources on our pepdEX system</dd>
+
-
<dt>dimer catastrophe</dt>
+
-
<dd>Homologues recombination may cause plasmid multimers which will increases segregational instability and burden, this is the reason why most lab coli are recA1 mutants. But so that our coli must able to colonize gut, it should be recA+ wild type strain. That's the problem!</dd>
+
-
</dl>
+
-
</html>
+
-
 
+
-
====stabilization modules====
+
-
 
+
-
<p class="lead">multimer resolution system:Tn1000(gamma delta) resolution system</p>
+
-
 
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Mrs-1.png|700px|center]]
+
-
This cassette encodes an autoregulated resolvase(serine type recombinase)from E.coli F plasmid transposon tn1000(tn3 family). Its promoter region consists of 3 sub-sites(res site) and can process recombination. This cassette can resolve multimer that formed during replicative transposition, so it can also resolve plasmid multimer providing plasmid stability by avoiding dimer catastrophe. For this reason, it is multimer resolution system(MRS) that provide the same function as E.coli chromosome XerCD/dif but acts independent of cell cycle and may have higher efficiency on plasmids compared with slow XerCD system.
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Mrs-2.png|thumb|550px|right]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Mrs-3.png|700px|center]]
+
-
 
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Mrs-4.png|200px]]
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
<p class="lead">partition system:from <em>pseudomonas putida </em>KT2440</p>
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Par1.png|500px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Par2.png|800px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Par3.png|500px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Par4.png|500px]]
+
-
 
+
-
<p class="lead">Post-segregation killing:srnBC toxin-antitoxin system</p>
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-TAgrenade.png|200px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-SrnBC-Mechanism1.png|800px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-SrnBC-Mechanism2.png|800px]]
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-bacteria-work-hard.png|200px|thumb|Work hard or Die hard!!!]]
+
-
It is type I toxin-antitoxin which belongs to hok/sok homologues, it expresses stable toxin encoded RNA and short lived antitoxin RNA that can neutralize toxin RNA by RNA interaction. It acts as post segregation killing system, which kills bacteria when it loss the DNA(genomic islands, plasmids, mobile gene elements) that contains it. Therefore we use it to reduce plasmid loss rate and make applications without antibiotics selection pressure more feasible.
+
-
 
+
-
Besides these modules, reducing the burden effect is also important to the system stability. Well designed system and lower gene dosage may help.
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Burden2.png|400px|center]]
+
-
<html>
+
-
<table class='table table-bordered'>
+
-
<thead>
+
-
<tr>
+
-
<th>HEAD</th>
+
-
<th>head</th>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
</thead>
+
-
<tbody>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>1</td>
+
-
      <td>2</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>3</td>
+
-
      <td>4</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>5</td>
+
-
      <td>6</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
</tbody>
+
-
</table>
+
-
</html>
+
-
 
+
-
<p class="lead">reference</p>
+
-
<ul class="unstyled">
+
-
<li>1.reference one</li>
+
-
<li>2.reference two</li>
+
-
</ul>
+
-
 
+
-
==== '''modeling and application''' ====
+
-
<h3>How to model plasmid instability:</h3>
+
-
 
+
-
We use Cooper's model (Cooper, N.S., M.E. Brown, and C.A. Caulcott, A ) that reduced the variants to three factors under steady state.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
[[FIle:NTU-Taida-Negative du.jpg|400px|center]]
+
-
 
+
-
=== '''safety of delivery system''' ===
+
-
 
+
-
Many turn off strategies have been developed, most of these are the inducible suicide system that can be activated at certain condition. For instance, in our project, we plan to use temperature and small molecule as activating signals( following picture). When the course of treatment ends, administration of small amount of tetracycline agonist will induce bacterial to commit suicide, leaving human body also cause suicide gene activation thereby avoid recombinant strain/gene polluting. And splitting suicide system to provide repression in trans can prevent plasmid transfering to wild type strains. There have been many off-the-rack parts can be used.
+
-
[[File:NTU-Taida-Suicide-system.png|500px|thumb|left|alt=new idea about safety|general scheme of suicide system ]]
+
-
 
+
-
However, these design cannot totally eliminate the risk of horizontal gene transfer(HGT), which recombinant genes can move to other organisms independent of suicide system. So besides suicide system, we have a new idea to deal with these kinds of HGT risks by RNA interaction.
+
-
 
+
-
Although bacteria lack for RNAi pathway, expressing well designed antisense RNAs have been shown to have inhibitory effect on target RNAs through competitive inhibition, and recent study showed that peptide nucleic acid (PNA) that antisense to antitoxin RNA 5' sequence can cause bacteria death. Putting appropriate antisense RNAs on untranslated region of transcripts may interfere target RNA function or translation. This property might be used to prevent HGT. For instance, HGT is more likely to occur between related species like lab E.coli & O157, laboratory E.coli have inactivated all its hok/sok toxin-antitoxin system by mutation, but wild bacteria especially pathogenic bacteria usually have more active TA locus on its chromosome like E.coli O157. we plan to put a stem loop from hok mRNA which can pair with sok RNA 5’sequence on UTR of antibiotic resistance genes we used in pepdEX system. IF wild bacteria steal our antibiotic resistance genes and express it, its antitoxin will be competitive inhibited and its toxin will express and kill the thief thus preventing HGT between lab & wild coli. This idea can have wide extension. Besides targeting antitoxin (functional RNA) of type I TA, designing antisense sequences that target RBS to down regulate targeted protein is also possible. Targeting antitoxin of type II TA, essential genes for metabolism, housekeeping genes and any sequences exist in potential HGT receivers but not our coli can be used. Even if the design cannot kill thieves, it can weaken receivers and reduce advantages antibiotic genes bring about thus reduce possibility and danger of HGT.
+
-
 
+
-
In the past the repression efficiencies of antisense RNA in bacteria are low, but after invention of the paired termini antisense RNA(PTasRNA) method and incorporate U turn/YUNR motif etc., this idea will become more and more feasible.
+
-
 
+
-
[[File:NTU-Taida-AsRNA.png|700px|center|alt=new idea about safety|Is it possible to use RNA interaction to avoid HGT? ]]
+
-
    <div class="row-fluid">
+
-
    <div class="span12">
+
-
      Level 1 of column
+
-
      <div class="row-fluid">
+
-
      <div class="span6">Level 2</div>
+
-
      <div class="span6">Level 2</div>
+
-
      </div>
+
-
    </div>
+
-
    </div>
+
-
 
+
-
==Modeling==
+
-
==Results==
+
-
<html>
+
-
<table class='table table-bordered'>
+
-
<thead>
+
-
<tr>
+
-
<th>HEAD</th>
+
-
<th>head</th>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
</thead>
+
-
<tbody>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>1</td>
+
-
      <td>2</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>3</td>
+
-
      <td>4</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
  <tr>
+
-
      <td>5</td>
+
-
      <td>6</td>
+
-
  </tr>
+
-
</tbody>
+
-
</table>
+
-
</html>
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
==Extension==
+
-
 
+
-
{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/ContentEnd}}{{:Team:NTU-Taida/Templates/Footer|ActiveNavbar=Project}}
+

Latest revision as of 17:15, 25 October 2012

Overal Project

Overall Project

Contents

Introduction

There has been a wide array of peptides, either innate or synthetic, used as drugs or vaccine in combat of different diseases. For instance, insulin was synthesized and mass produced in bacteria; long, synthetic peptide vaccine has also brought to bedside to help treat patient with invasive cancers. (Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 May;8(5):351-60.) However, the delivery of the peptide into human body is a big issue, since it cannot be administered orally, and has a poor distribution and absorption as compared to small molecules drugs in human body. With the advent of biotechnology and the growing forum of synthetic biology, we try to engineer and finely design different circuits in bacteria, which can deliver peptides through epidermal, buccal, rectal, or enteral. As for a simple exemplification of our ultimate goal of microbial peptide delivery system, we choose GLP-1, the endogenous hormone as our delivery model. Our design features efficiency, quick response to the environment changes, and sustainable release of GLP-1. This is the first model of our peptide delivery system, and opens a new room for the synthetic biology in medicine applications.

GLP-1, a human innate neuro-peptide for energy balance, is chosen to combat for obesity and metabolic syndrome. We engineer the non-pathogenic E. coli which senses fatty acids in intestines and secretes synthetic GLP-1. Appropriate signal peptides and penetratin are used to facilitate peptide secretion and intestinal uptake. Furthermore, we design a circuit with quorum sensing and double repressors, which aims to generate quick but sustainable responses and serves as an anti-noise filter. Plasmid stabilization modules including partition system and multimer resolution system are also incorporated to circumvent the undesirable loss or segregational instability of our artificial device. With this general concept of delivery of short peptide into human body, we can also target other human diseases with alternative circuit designs.

Circuit

Fat Extinguisher

The main circuit is designed to detect the presence of fatty acid in the intestinal environment and produce the peptide drug (GLP-1 in this case) and cell penetrating peptide (CPP) as response. There are two core systems: double repressors and quorum sensing, which aims to corroborate a quick responsive to fat ingestion and stable functioning circuit. We start the circuit with fatty acid sensor (fadR), which is followed by double repressor (tetR and LacI). The fadR is a novel promoter which can detect the presence of fatty acid; the double repressor tetR and LacI combine to make the circuit more stable and form a prominent threshold.

Thermal Avenger

We designed a thermal sensitive promoter in our circuit to sense the change of temperature of ambient. The temperature sensitive repressor CI would dimerize in room temperature and suppress the expression of downward gene sequence; however, when the temperature rises, the dimer would break and lose the function of repression. As our experiment proves, the circuit works differently under room temperature from inside human body (370C). As for application of the thermal sensitive device, first, we incorporate toxin and anti-toxin in our thermal promoter, which works as a self destructor. Second, we can utilize the thermal sensitive characteristic of the circuit to make a baseline secretion level of the GLP-1.

Stability and Safety

Every genetically modified (GM) system that functions outside of the laboratories will face two major problems: system stability and safety! Without selective pressure, we have to deal with plasmid segregation instability, which may lead to a incomplete system due to loss of circuit pieces; to make our lab E. coli colonized bowel we have to use recA+ strains which may cause plasmid multimer. Our GM lab E. coli will also be in contact with many kinds of wild bacteria and is under the risk of horizontal gene transfer.