Team:Goettingen/week7-1

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 12:44, 26 September 2012 by Rosin (Talk | contribs)

Deutsch  / English 

#1 Selection / Swimming - 7th week

Back to overview

V06_11


Swimming assay with trypton agar
  • Experiment:
    A variety of agar conditions were tested: 1) 1% trypton, 0.3% agar, 0.5% NaCl; 2) 0.5% trypton, 0.3%, 0.5% NaCl; 3) like 1, but with additionally 0.5% glcose; 4) like 2), but with additionally 0.5% glucose. The swimming assay was performed as mentioned in methods.
  • Observations & results:
    All plates w/o glucose showed strong swimming over night. Therefore, glucose could be considered to be taxis-inhbiting.

V06_12


Comined swimming assays
  • Experiment:
    The strains from the previos experiments were combined on a single plate (several distinct drops on the same plate) to compare their swimming ability directly.

V06_13


V06_13_1: Separation assay
  • Experiment:
    Two strains with different promotor strengths were mixed 1:1 (OD600) and dropped onto a trypton plate. After several hours of swimming, the bacteria from the most outer edge of the swimming halo were picked and quantified to identify the ratio between the both starter-strains.
  • Observations & Results:
    The plated did not show enough swimming, to ensure a positiv separation of the two strains. Further incubation times might be helpful.

V06_13_2: Comparing swimming assays
  • Experiment:
    Two strains with different promotor strengths were mixed 1:1 (OD600) and dropped onto a trypton plate. After several hours of swimming, the bacteria from the most outer edge of the swimming halo were picked and quantified to identify the ratio between the both starter-strains.

  • Observations & Results:
    On each quater of a 150 mm petri dish was one bacteria colony droped. Therefore, the swimming ability of all four strains could be compared directly.

V06_13_3: Chemotaxis assay with attractant
  • Experiment:
    On minimal plates (only 0.3% agar and 0.5% NaCl) was one strain dropped. In a distance of about 2 cm was an attractant dropped, to induce directed chemotaxis.

  • Observations & Results:
    No directed swimming or swimming at all was detectable. The aspartat attractant might not have reached the bacteria.


Back to overview

↑ Back to top!