Team:Valencia/other microalgae

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 22:14, 26 September 2012 by Essanchi27 (Talk | contribs)



Other Microalgae


Our aims go beyond building the most efficient photosynthetic biolamp, into trying to develop more robust and simple designs based on bioluminescent vascular plants. These kind of biolamps would be less energy-efficient, due to the lower surface-volume quotient and amount of structural carbon, but would be much easier to transport, manage, upkeep and commercialize. Vascular plants are robust organisms with a wider tolerance to changes in environmental conditions and independent of a broth vessel and complex tube systems (as they have their own biological structures for this function - xylems and phloems).

In first place, we would test of luminescence of S. elongatus WT with psbA-luxAB as grown broth biolamp, to assess the magnitude of the problem of pigment shading of luminescence.
The next step would be the transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii’s chloroplast with the lux cassette under regulation of psbA promoter (ligation including psbA-RBS-luxABCDE-Ter). These eukaryotic microalgae have a large chloroplast with prokaryote-like genetic system. Need for homologous recombination and DNA-pistol to insert our construct into the chloroplast.


  • Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

    Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is haploid unicellular green algae. It is about 10 micrometers long and 3 wide and has two flagella. Much of its volume is occupied by its only chloroplast which has 80 copies of its genome. Chlamydomonas can grow by autotrophic or heterotrophic ways using organic carbon and chemical energy sources.

    This alga is widely spread around the world and is one of mostly used laboratory organism. It is used as model in studies of cellular movement, environmental stimuli responses and photosynthetic and cellular recognition studies.


    Source: http://www.algaebase.org/

    In the industry this algae has been used on different areas such as: biofuels production (lipid for biodiesel), biorremediation (heavy metals subtraction from water), pigment production (carotenoids) and bioreactor for production of recombinant proteins for medical use. This is due to some of its features as easy and cheap culture, great capacity of store biomass and because commonly it is considered non harmful for human beings.


  • Table 1: source: http://www.revistaciencia.amc.edu.mx/

    Features

    Organisms

    Production cost

    Production time

    Staggering capacity

    Quality of product

    zGlucosilation capacity

    Contamination risk

    Storage cost

    Bacteria

    Low

    Short

    High

    Low

    No

    Endotoxins

    Moderated

    Yeast

    Medium

    Medium

    High

    Medium

    Yes

    Low

    Moderated

    Insect cells

    High

    Medium

    Medium

    High

    Yes

    High

    Expensive

    Mamals cells

    High

    Long

    Very low

    Very High

    Yes

    Viruses prions

    Expensive

    Animals

    High

    Very long

    Low

    Very high

    Yes

    Viruses prions

    Expensive

    Plant cells

    Low

    Short

    High

    High

    Yes

    Low

    Low cost

    Plants

    Very low

    Long

    Very high

    High

    Nuclei: yes

    Chloroplast: no

    Low

    Low cost

    Microalgae

    Very low

    Short

    Very long

    High

    Nuclei: yes

    Chlorplast: no

    Low

    Low cost



  • Experimental design

    • Genetic circuit:

      The designed genetic circuit is very similar to the one that is employed at co-culture project. In this one the psbA promoter regulates λ production; and this production of λ regulates the expression of lux operon.


      During the day the presence of CI repressor inhibits the expression of lux operon because alga does not emit light.



      During night λ product is not present and that allows the expression of lux operon and the following light emission.



    • Transform Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

      The psbAI gen is a chloroplast’s gen. The reasons why we chose to transform chloroplast genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are exposed in the next table:


      Table 1: source: Henrt Daniell, Muhammad S. Khan and Lori Allison, Trends in Plant science. (milstones in chloroplast genetic enginering.

    • Strain selected:

      With the intention of avoiding the use of antibiotics at selection of transformed cells we decided to employ the photosynthesis-deficient mutant strain ac-uc-221 (CC373) of C. reinhardtiii.

      The ac-uc-2-21 is a deletion mutation in the chloroplast atpB gen, which results in a clean, non-reverting acetate-requiring phenotype. This strain was originally obtained from the culture collection of the Chlamydomonas Genetics Center at Duke University, NC, USA

      The use mutant strain CC373 enables the selection of transformed cells employing vectors which carry the DNA of interest between plastome homologous regions and atpB gen. The atpB gen allows the restoration of a complete atpB gen copy. Then transformed cells will be able to grow in a culture medium without acetate and high light conditions while not transformed will not do.

    • Vector selected:

      To introduce our construction and complement the deletion mutation ac-uc-2-21 we chose to use plasmid p +157 (Inger Lill Anthonisen, 2002). This plasmid has between its This one has between inverted repeats homologous to plastome, regions XhoI and XbaI restriction sites flanking 5’ rbcL (el promotor), uidA gen and 3’ UTR from psaB (to stabilize transcripts).Apart it has atpB gen.

      This plasmid has between its two regions with inverted repeat sequences homologous to plastome, targets for restriction enzymes Xhol and Xbal. Between these targets there is the uidA gen flanked by the rbcL 5’ UTR and the psaB 3’ UTR (this last stabilizes the transcripts). Out of these sequences it has the atpB gen.

    • Method selected:

      Chlamydomonas´ chloroplast can be transformed by different ways. The most prefered are Polyethilenglicol and gen gun methods. We chose gun gen because we found more literature explaining it. This consists on adhering your construction to gold or tungsten particles. After that you will shot them to your algae culture (in agar plates) at empty conditions.

      Bullets will: - Fall and not hit algae. - Kill algae. - Break through algae. - Hit the chloroplast and transform it. As with all chloroplast transformation methods the introduction of desired DNA will be done by homologous recombination.


    • Problems

      Future

      This opens the way for further research on eukaryotic chloroplast transformation that can lead to the development of glowing trees on boulevards (see Team Cambridge 2011).

      The last experimental step would be the transformation of Tobacco plant cell with psbA-lux cassette and development of a protoplast. The protoplast can be grown into a callus, from which we can finally obtain a bioluminescent plant.

      Bibliography

      - About chlamydomonas straipe: o Shepherd et al. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1353-1357 o Myers et al. (1982) Plasmid 7, 133-151 o Woessner et al. (1984) Plant Mol. Biol. 3, 177-190 o Boynton et al. (1988) Science 240, 1534-1538 - Vector de transformación: o Blowers,A.D., Klein, U., Ellmore, G.S. and Bogorad,L (1993) Functional in vivo analyses of the 3’ flanking sequences of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast rbcL and psaB genes. Mol. Gen. Genet., 238, 339-349.