"
Team:University College London/Module 6/Conclusion
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Sednanalien (Talk | contribs) (→Conclusion) |
Sednanalien (Talk | contribs) (→Conclusion) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
| - | We have successfully transformed our cells to produce a periplasmic nuclease, a necessary feature to prevent transformation of wild-type cells in the marine environment. Furthermore, we have proven that this BioBrick does not adversely affect the | + | We have successfully transformed our cells to produce a periplasmic nuclease, a necessary feature to prevent transformation of wild-type cells in the marine environment. Furthermore, we have proven that this BioBrick does not adversely affect the viability of our cells, allowing it to be utilised as part of a containment system for engineered cells. |
| - | + | Future work would attempt to construct a three-fold | |
| - | Future work would | + | |
Revision as of 14:23, 26 September 2012
Module 6: Containment
Description | Design | Construction | Characterisation | Modelling | Results | Conclusions
Conclusion
We have successfully transformed our cells to produce a periplasmic nuclease, a necessary feature to prevent transformation of wild-type cells in the marine environment. Furthermore, we have proven that this BioBrick does not adversely affect the viability of our cells, allowing it to be utilised as part of a containment system for engineered cells.
Future work would attempt to construct a three-fold
