Team:Paris Bettencourt/Encapsulation

• Main
  • Home
  • Parts Submitted
  • Acknowledgements
  • Contact
  • Bonus
• Team
• Project
  • Overview
  • Delay system
  • Semantic containment
  • Restriction enzyme system
  • MAGE
  • Suicide system
  • Encapsulation
  • Synthetic import domain
• Achievements
• Human Practice
  • Overview
  • Interview
  • Report
  • Debate
  • Workshop
  • Wiki Screen
  • HGT
  • Team Perception
• Safety
  • Safety Questions
  • Safety Assessment
• Notebook
• Attributions

Overview

Polymer gels have found a place in microbial biotechnology by providing a means of spatial organization. The micro-environments within gel beads can grant the microbes within protection, nutrients, and selective agents/chemicals. Given this, gel beads are already attractive for environmental applications of genetically modified bacteria. Synthetic bacterial systems may benefit from (or require) nutrients and agents added to gel beads. Many other practical reasons for use of beads exist, such as transportation and analysis.

Our interest is to take the concept of cell encapsulation further by implementing total cell entrapment. While normal gel beads protect the bacteria within from the surroundings, we are here to ensure the surroundings are protected from the bacteria within the beads. A method was found for encapsulation and entrapment of yeast [1] and was adapted to synthetic bacterial systems.

The above beads show the visual contrast between treated and untreated alginate beads. The pink ones are treated, and the white ones are not.

Objectives

Our goal is to design a live-bacteria entrapment system. More than just encapsulating bacteria, we want to fully prevent their escape from the bead body into the surroundings.

Alginate and other gel-based beads have been used successfully to prolong enzymatic activity in bioreactors[2], but systems such as these are usually designed to allow steady release of microbes. This is not acceptable when microbes containing potentially dangerous synthetic genes are being used in the environment, so we aim to prevent release of bacteria entirely.

Design

Cell-containing 2% alginate can be created by mixing 4% alginate in equal parts with cell suspension. Alginate beads are created by extruding 2% alginate beads through a needle into 1.5% CaCl2 solution and curing for 1 hour. The beads are then equilibrated at 50mM CaCl2 overnight.

Covalent Stabilization procedure: Polyethyleneimine (0.5% w/v with 50mM CaCl2) diffuses slowly into alginate beads over 2-24 hours to vary thickness. The beads are washed with water. The covalent cross-linkages are formed between polyethyleneimine molecules by incubating in glutaraldehyde (1% with 10mM sodium phosphate pH=7) for 1 minute followed by washing.

Experiments and results

Cell Containment Assay

Our objective is to entrap cells that are still viable and able to perform metabolism. To asses this, beads were suspended in buffer and allowed to incubate at room temperature over several days. Presuming that treated beads could result in total cell containment, we wished to see if more viable cells would be released by physically destroying the beads.

Experimental setup

• 2% Alginate beads containing cells were prepared (50mL saturated culture resuspended in 15 mL fresh LB and mixed with 15 mL 4% Alginate).
• 4g beads were set aside in PBS at 4° as a negative control for containment (untreated alginate).
• 8g beads were treated as described above with polyethyleneimine and glutaraldehyde.
• 4g of treated beads were broken by cutting with a razor blade
• 4g of Untreated, Treated, and Treated & Broken beads were suspended in PBS buffer and left at room temperature.
• 100μL of supernatant was plated periodically to quantify release of cells.

Results

Perspectives

This method for stabilization of beads was adapted from a method designed for yeast cells. Although the system appears effective at preventing cell release, we are concerned that the treatment method is lethal for cells. We need to follow up the cell containment assay with cell activity assays to assure that we have living cells capable of performing their intended function. This may include a white-blue screening assay to see if cells are capable of protein production within.

Further Experiments

This method for stabilization of beads was adapted from a method designed for yeast cells. Although the system appears effective at preventing cell release, we are concerned that the treatment method is lethal for cells. We need to follow up the cell containment assay with cell activity assays to assure that we have living cells capable of performing their intended function. This may include a white-blue screening assay to see if cells are capable of protein production within.

We intend to find a covalent cross-linkage agent that is less lethal to cells than glutaraldehyde and then demonstrate better performance using this.

Lastly, it is a high priority to get alginate bead systems to work with our other biosafety systems such as the colicin toxin system. We can analyze the viability of cells using propidium iodide stain with the beads. In the end, the beads are supposed to work with the complete biosafety system. Particularly the arabinose-based delay system requires beads to retain arabinose physically and modulate

Bristol 2010 Nitrate Reporter

The Bristol 2010 team probably did not have access to an automated kinetic fluorescence and OD measurement device. We monitored GFP expression level at different KNO3 induction levels in order to better characterize the part.

Alginate beads were created (uninduced) and then incubated in plain LB and LB with 100mM KNO3. The difference in green fluorescence was visible by eye under the Lumatool.

References

1. Birnbaum, S., Pendleton, R., Larsson, P.-O. & Mosbach, K. Covalent stabilization of alginate gel for the entrapment of living whole cells. Biotechnology Letters 3, 393-400 (1981). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01134097 Paper]

2. Boon, N. et al. Bioaugmenting bioreactors for the continuous removal of 3-chloroaniline by a slow release approach. Environmental science & technology 36, 4698-4704 (2002). [http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12433184 Paper]