Team:Paris Bettencourt/Attributions

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(External help)
(Cooperation)
Line 38: Line 38:
==Cooperation==
==Cooperation==
-
 
+
Main cooperation of our team this year was based on mutual exchange on containment, safety and human practices in general in the synthetic biology realm. Specific examples:
* iGEM Grenoble team:  
* iGEM Grenoble team:  
*:We helped them improve their safety sheet.  
*:We helped them improve their safety sheet.  
-
*:2 team members came to our debate, one student was part of the adjudication pannel, they gave us detaile feedback at the end.
+
*:Team members came to our debate, and were part of the adjudication pannel, they gave us detailed feedback at the end.
* iGEM UCL team:  
* iGEM UCL team:  
-
*:2 team members came to Paris. We helped them set up meetings with some researchers in Paris from La Paillasse and Fabelier, and offered them crash.  
+
*:Team members came to Paris. We helped them set up meetings with some researchers in Paris from La Paillasse and Fabelier, and offered them crash.  
*:They participated to the debate as part of the adjudication pannel, and gave us detailed feedback and the end.  
*:They participated to the debate as part of the adjudication pannel, and gave us detailed feedback and the end.  
<!-- ########## Don't edit below ########## -->
<!-- ########## Don't edit below ########## -->
{{:Team:Paris_Bettencourt/footer}}
{{:Team:Paris_Bettencourt/footer}}

Revision as of 00:26, 27 September 2012


iGEM Paris Bettencourt 2012

Attributions

Responsibilities in the Team

All of the designs, constructs (unless stated otherwise) and experiments presented in this wiki were performed by the members of the 2012 Paris Bettencourt team. The advisors and instructors were providing feedback and advice, when needed. None of the subjects of this project are being studied or developed in the hosting lab.

All members of the team were following the development of the project as a whole. However, in order to be able to work on several modules simultaneously, we formed teams of 1 or 2 that were mainly responsible for each part.

Delay system: Ernest Mordret
Semantic containment: Jean Cury
Restriction enzyme system: Denis Samuylov and Claire Mayer
MAGE: Guillaume Villain and Zoran Marinkovic
Suicide system: Julianne Rieders and Aishah Prastowo
Encapsulation: Dylan Iverson
Synthetic Import Domain: Zoran Marinkovic and Guillaume Villain
Human practice: Claire Mayer and Jean Cury
Wiki layout: Jean Cury
Stop motion: Dylan Iverson, Jean Cury and Julianne Rieders
Bonus: Aishah Prastowo and Julianne Rieders


External help

We are extremely thankful to all the following labs, iGEM teams, researchers we met, and other people, for their help :

  • Sara Aguiton for her precious advice on the human practice report.
  • Professor Mamzer-Bruneel, Professor Gouyon, Professor Morange, Professor Ricroch for the interviews.
  • Professor Yokobayashi, for the sRNA repression plasmidic system
  • Osnat Gillor, for the Colicin E2 strains
  • Miklos de Zamaroczy, for the Colicin D strain
  • Bethan and Philip from the UCL iGEM team for participating in our debate and for their discusion and feedback.
  • Grégory Hansen and Jean-Baptise Lugagne from the grenoble iGEM team for participating in our debate, and for their feedback.
  • Dr. Rosenberg, for the SMR6316 strain with encoded I-SceI endonuclease.
  • Dr. Josef Altenbuchner, for the plasmid pJOE3075 with encoded Rhamnose promoter.
  • Esengul Yildirim and TUDelft iGEM 2012 team for sending us two biobricks: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K175027 BBa_K175027] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K175041 BBa_K175041].
  • Theo Sanderson of Cambridge iGEM 2010 team for advice on use of the lux brick.
  • Myelin Haoqian Zhang for help with mercury project.
  • Bristol 2010 iGEM team for their wonderful Nitrate reporter.

Cooperation

Main cooperation of our team this year was based on mutual exchange on containment, safety and human practices in general in the synthetic biology realm. Specific examples:

  • iGEM Grenoble team:
    We helped them improve their safety sheet.
    Team members came to our debate, and were part of the adjudication pannel, they gave us detailed feedback at the end.
  • iGEM UCL team:
    Team members came to Paris. We helped them set up meetings with some researchers in Paris from La Paillasse and Fabelier, and offered them crash.
    They participated to the debate as part of the adjudication pannel, and gave us detailed feedback and the end.
Copyright (c) 2012 igem.org. All rights reserved. Design by FCT.