|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{Team:Bielefeld/Head}} | | {{Team:Bielefeld/Head}} |
| | | | |
| - | <div style="text-align:justify;">
| |
| - | ==Week 17 (08/20 - 08/26/12)==
| |
| | | | |
| - | ===Monday August 20th=== | + | <html> |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| + | <style type="text/css"> |
| - | **Biggg Colony-PCR of the [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863113 CBDclos(T7)+GFP_His]-ligation with the result, that all seem to carry [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863112 CBDclos(T7)]. The ligation didn't work at all...
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | * '''Team Cloning of Bacterial Laccases:'''
| + | ul {list-style-image:none;} |
| - | :*Digestion of pSB1C3 plasmid backbone, tthl_HIS and bpul_HIS for doing the assembly with the new t7 promoter and J23110 again.
| + | #bodyContent{ |
| - | :* We did PCRs on bpul_HIS, bhal_HIS and ecol_HIS again. | + | background-color: white; |
| | + | } |
| | | | |
| - | ===Tuesday August 21st===
| + | </style> |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| + | |
| - | **Tested restriction enzymes.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Activity Tests:''' I know, all of you are expecting us to report about some laccase activity now, but today is going to be different. Today we started with a special task: a q-PCR. As written in one of our last labjournal entries we have discussed a lot and searched for reasons why our laccases are not active. We decided that one possible step to find the mistake is to analyze the transcript. The level of mRNA will show us if our plasmid is expressed at all or if there might be something wrong with it. Team Cultivation cultivated small samples of ''E.coli'' KRX with plasmids of laccases from the following organisms:''Escherichia coli'', ''Bacillus pumilus'', ''Bacillus halodurans C-125'', ''Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris B100'' and ''Thermus thermophilus''. As controls a sample with a [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K525710 ligase a] plasmid (to ensure the induction works) and ''E. coli KRX'' (without any plasmid) were used. So our first step today was freezing some cell pellets for a RNA isolation and ordering primers. We will go on with our new mission as soon as the primers arrive.
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | * '''Team Cloning of Bacterial Laccases:'''
| + | <!-- navigator --> |
| - | ** We designed primers for q-PCR for Team Activity Tests (details, look above). The PCRs with this primer pairs should result in about 200 bases long fragments.
| + | <div id="nav" class="tabs"> |
| - | ** We realized that the primer pairs we anneal for the promoter parts had about 2000 ng/µl if diluted 1:10 from originally 100 pmol. Maybe our used amounts on promoter for the assemblys was a LITTLE to high. So now we try a dilution of 1:1000 with about 2 ng/µl.
| + | <div class="scroller"> |
| - | ** PCRs of different laccases were purificated and digested for suffix insertion.
| + | <ul style="list-style-type:none"> |
| - | ** Ligation of the laccase genes ecol, ecol_HIS and bpul and bpul_HIS, the 1:000 diluted (0,1 pm/µl) promoters (pT7 and P110) in pSB1C3 vector.
| + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/Starting"><strong>Prologue</strong></a></li> |
| - | **Ligation of the digested ecol_pSB1C3 and ecol_HIS_pSB1C3 plasmids with the 1:000 diluted (0,1 pm/µl) promoters (pT7 and P110).
| + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week1"><strong>Week 1</strong></a></li> |
| - | ** Cleanup of the PCRs from day before and digest with ''Xba''I and ''Pst''I for the assembly with promoter and pSB1C3.
| + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week2"><strong>Week 2</strong></a></li> |
| - | * '''Team Fungal and Plant Laccases:'''
| + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week3"><strong>Week 3</strong></a></li> |
| - | ** We designed primers for the laccase BBa_K500002 for cloning in ''P. pastoris'' shuttle vector.
| + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week4"><strong>Week 4</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week5"><strong>Week 5</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week6"><strong>Week 6</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week7"><strong>Week 7</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week8"><strong>Week 8</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week9"><strong>Week 9</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week10"><strong>Week 10</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week11"><strong>Week 11</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week12"><strong>Week 12</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week13"><strong>Week 13</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week14"><strong>Week 14</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week15"><strong>Week 15</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week16"><strong>Week 16</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week17"><strong>Week 17</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week18"><strong>Week 18</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week19"><strong>Week 19</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week20"><strong>Week 20</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week21"><strong>Week 21</strong></a></li> |
| | + | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/week22"><strong>Week 22</strong></a></li> |
| | | | |
| - | ===Wednesday August 22nd===
| + | </ul> |
| - | *'''Street Science:'''
| + | |
| - | :*Went to Dr. Joe Max Risse today and asked him about the mircoorganisms of the Fermentationgroup. He recommended ''Euglena gracilis'', since it is without risk, big, colorful, and very healthy under the microscop.
| + | |
| - | :*I asked for the bacteria they have and he told me I could check if their ''Kocuria rosea'' is a wild type.
| + | |
| - | :*In the DMSZ catalog there are three strains of ''Kocuria rosea'' and all have been assessed to be of riskgroup 1, which is the safest group of bacteria and means it is unlikely that it will infect humans.
| + | |
| - | :*I also asked for ''Penicillium chrysogenum'' but the one they use is a GVO.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Site Directed Mutagenesis:'''
| + | |
| - | :*Ordered new primers for Xantomonas Campestris SDM, since there is still no positive colony and even gradient-PCR gave the wrong product
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| + | |
| - | **Test-restriction of all isolated [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863102 CBDcex(T7)]- and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His]-plasmids with ''Not''I with no positive result.
| + | |
| - | **Restarted from the beginning and made a gradient-PCR for [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863102 CBDcex(T7)] to get some more product.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Cultivation & Purification:'''
| + | |
| - | ** Made the SDS-Pages of the cultivation on 08/15.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Cloning of Bacterial Laccases:'''
| + | |
| - | :* Colony PCRs: some prefix insertions of promoters in pSB1C3 with ecol and ecol_HIS showed positive bands, so we picked the colonies for plasmid isolation. The problem with the prefix insertion of the promoters in pSB1C3 with the ecol gene is that we can’t easily prove that the promoters were ligated in the backbone because with control restriction there would be an about 50 bp longer fragment which is difficult to see even in 3 % agarose gel. For this reason we designed FW primers (J23103_K_FW and J23110/117_K_FW and T7_K_FW) for our colony PCR, which can just bind, if the new promoter sequence is included in the plasmid. Until all colonies from the promoter J23110 ligation were red, we had some white colonies for the pT7 promoter in pSB1C3 backbone. So we picked a positive colony and plated it for plasmid isolation.
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===Thursday August 23rd===
| + | </div> |
| - | * '''Team Cloning of Bacterial Laccases:'''
| + | </div> |
| - | :* Plasmid isolation and sending plasmids for sequencing.
| + | </html> |
| - | * '''Team Fungal Laccases:''' We did PCRs on tvel35 plasmid with primer pairs Pc_lac35.P.FW / Pc_lac35.S.RV for trying ligation in pSB1C3 again and with Pc_lac35_FW_oS / Pc_lac35_RV.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| + | |
| - | **Clean-up of [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863102 CBDcex(T7)]- and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His]-PCR-product (pooled good ones and bad ones, respectively).
| + | |
| - | **Restriktion of the [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863102 CBDcex(T7)]-PCR-product with ''Eco''RI and ''Pst''I for ligation with the backbone and ''Eco''RI and ''Age''I for a assembly.
| + | |
| - | **Restriktion of the [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His]-PCR-product with ''Eco''RI and ''Pst''I for ligation with the backbone and ''Ngo''MIV and ''Pst''I.
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===Friday August 24th=== | + | <div style="text-align:justify;"> |
| - | * '''Team Site Directed Mutagenesis:'''
| + | ==Week 17 (08/20 - 08/26/12)== |
| - | **Plasmid-isolation and digestion of tvel10 colonies with ''Not''I showed that two of the plasmids have an insert of the right size.
| + | |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| + | |
| - | **Stopped restrictions and clean-up them up. Dephosphorilated the linearized backbone and ligated it to [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His], [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863121 GFP_His] and assembled [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863103 CBDcex(T7)+GFP_His].
| + | |
| - | **[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K863112 CBDclos(T7)]-cells plated to get some more plasmid.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ===Saturday August 25th=== | + | |
| - | STREET SCIENCE
| + | |
| - | Visit of Danish guys till 08/27
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ===Sunday August 26th===
| |
| - | * '''Team Cellulose Binding Domain:'''
| |
| - | **Made-up the idea to have a constitutive promoter (like <partinfo>BBa_J61101</partinfo>) in front of the cellulose binding domain and the GFP. With a Freiburg-Prefix in front of the CBDs we could even easily switch directions of CBD and GFP.
| |
| - | **Transformed <partinfo>BBa_J61101</partinfo> from the iGEM-plate into KRX and plated it on AMP-selection-dish.
| |
| - | * '''Team Cultivation & Purification:'''
| |
| - | ** Made precultures of ''E. coli'' KRX without plasmid (negative control) and with plasmids containing [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K863020 BBa_K863020], [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K863000 BBa_K863000], [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K863005 BBa_K863005], [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K863010 BBa_K863010], and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K863015 BBa_K863015]. As postive control we used [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K525710 BBa_K525710 (Ligase A)].
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | {{Team:Bielefeld/Sponsoren}} | | {{Team:Bielefeld/Sponsoren}} |
"
