Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Judging Criteria

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Gold criteria)
(Judging criteria)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Team:Bielefeld/Head}}
{{Team:Bielefeld/Head}}
-
==Judging criteria==
 
-
 
-
=== Bronze criteria===
 
-
 
-
* Registration of our team
 
-
* Judging form completed
 
-
* Team Wiki constructed
 
-
* Presentation of a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
 
-
* One new submitted and highly-documented standard BioBrick Part or Device. A new application of and outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry also counts.
 
-
 
-
=== Silver criteria===
 
-
In addition to the Bronze criteria...
 
-
 
-
* Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
 
-
* Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
 
-
 
-
===Gold criteria===
 
-
One or more of the following aspects in addition to the Bronze & Silver criteria...
 
-
 
-
* Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part.
 
-
::The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.
 
-
* Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
 
-
* Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.
 
-
 
-
{{Team:Bielefeld/Sponsoren}}
 

Latest revision as of 15:08, 25 September 2012