Team:Goettingen/week10-2
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m (moved Team:Goettingen/week10 to Team:Goettingen/week10-2) |
|||
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | In order to clone the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs into pSB1C3, all components were digested with <i>EcoRI</i> and <i>PstI</i> according to the protocol. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments. </li> | + | In order to clone the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs into pSB1C3, all components were digested with <i>EcoRI</i> and <i>PstI</i> according to the <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Project/Methods">protocol</a>. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments. </li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The gel did not feature fragments of the expected size. Obviously, something was wrong with the digestion. </li> | The gel did not feature fragments of the expected size. Obviously, something was wrong with the digestion. </li> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
In order to gain more plasmid material of the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs over night cultured were prepared for a subsequent plasmid isolation.<br> | In order to gain more plasmid material of the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs over night cultured were prepared for a subsequent plasmid isolation.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
20E - #2 <br> | 20E - #2 <br> | ||
20G - #1 <br> | 20G - #1 <br> | ||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
18K - #1 <br> | 18K - #1 <br> | ||
18C - #2 <br></li> | 18C - #2 <br></li> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<br></td></tr> | <br></td></tr> | ||
Line 75: | Line 77: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following protocol. Additionally, a negative control as well as a positive control were prepared this time. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% agarose gel.<br></li> | + | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Project/Methods">protocol</a>l. Additionally, a negative control as well as a positive control were prepared this time. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% agarose gel.<br></li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The did not function again for no bands were visible on the gel; only the marker was clearly discernible. However, since also the positive control did not feature the slightest band, we assume that something might be wrong with our polymerase.</li> | The did not function again for no bands were visible on the gel; only the marker was clearly discernible. However, since also the positive control did not feature the slightest band, we assume that something might be wrong with our polymerase.</li> | ||
Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | To give it a last try the <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following protocol one last time. Here again, a 1% agarose gel was prepared to investigate the PCRs outcome.</li> | + | To give it a last try the <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Project/Methods">protocol</a> one last time. Here again, a 1% agarose gel was prepared to investigate the PCRs outcome.</li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The gel of the PCR delivered the same picture as last time. No band could be observed except for the marker. Even the positive control does not work. Thus, we decided to buy a new polymerase.</li> | The gel of the PCR delivered the same picture as last time. No band could be observed except for the marker. Even the positive control does not work. Thus, we decided to buy a new polymerase.</li> | ||
Line 116: | Line 118: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by Phusion polymerase according to the following protocol. We also prepared a negative control as well as a positive control. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% analytical agarose gel.<br></li> | + | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by Phusion polymerase according to the following <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Project/Methods">protocol</a>. We also prepared a negative control as well as a positive control. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% analytical agarose gel.<br></li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
Finally,the PCR was successful! We were able to receive bands of the expected size for each construct. Obviously, the <i>pfu</i> polymerase was not functional anymore and had caused the PCRs failure. </li> | Finally,the PCR was successful! We were able to receive bands of the expected size for each construct. Obviously, the <i>pfu</i> polymerase was not functional anymore and had caused the PCRs failure. </li> |
Latest revision as of 17:18, 22 September 2012
Deutsch / English |
#2 Speed Improvement - 10th weekBack to overview
Back to overview |