"

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 21:01, 26 October 2012 (view source) Vparasco (Talk | contribs) m (→Secretion Rate of Trp as a function of culture growth) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:01, 26 October 2012 (view source) Lucho.Moro (Talk | contribs) m (→Coculture of transformed strains) Newer edit →
Line 239:		Line 239:
	|-		|-
	|1		|1
-	|YFP_TRP_TRPZipper+++	+	|YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2
	|'''-T'''		|'''-T'''
	|-		|-
	|2		|2
-	|YFP_TRP	+	|YFP_TRPb
	|'''-T'''		|'''-T'''
	|-		|-

---

Revision as of 21:01, 26 October 2012

• iGEM BsAs
  • The team
  • Official roster
  • Members
  • Where we come from

  • Safety
  • Key questions

  • Attributions
  • Attributions

  • Sponsors
  • Institutional

  Data Page
• Project
  • Synthetic ecology
  • Overview
  • Motivation
  • Design
  • Possible applications

  • Schemes
  • Crossfeeding
  • Independent Population Control
  • Cross-population control
  • Stochastic State Transitions

  • Modeling
  • Modeling synEcology
  • Advanced modeling

  Data Page
• Results and Devices
  • Strains characterization
  • Strains description
  • Fluorescence screening
  • Screening of strain proportion
  • Auxotrophy confirmation
  • Coculture in liquid medium
  • Revertant control
  • Trp basal production
  • Growth dependence

  • BBs design
  • Trp/His export devices
  • Backup devices
  • Preparing for sending

  • Testing
  • BioBricks testing
  • SynEco testing

  Data Page
• Human practices
  • Garage Lab
  • Spreading the word
  • Solving local problems

  • EMBO
  • Seeding SynBio in Latin America

  Data Page

Contents 1 After the Jamboree! 1.1 Week 1&2 : Yeast expression vectors & Transformations 1.2 Week 3: synthetic Ecology Characterization 1.2.1 BB characterization 1.2.1.1 Secretion Rate of Trp as a function of culture growth 1.2.1.2 Tryptophan secretion at increasing histidine concentrations 1.2.2 Strain characterization 1.2.2.1 Experimental determination of strains death rate 1.2.2.2 Growth rate in function of the concentration of Trp and His 1.2.3 Coculture of transformed strains

After the Jamboree!

When we returned from the Latin America Jamboree we focused all our efforts on completing the neccesary transformations to test our devices and our projet as a whole.

We devided this task in three sections

Week 1&2 : Yeast expression vectors & Transformations

Plasmids

YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2	details
YFP_TRPa_TRPZipper2	details
YFP_TRPb_PoliWb	details
YFP_TRPa_PoliWb	details
CFP_HIS_PoliHa	details
CFP_HIS_PoliHb	details

Week 3: synthetic Ecology Characterization

xxoo

BB characterization

xxoo

Secretion Rate of Trp as a function of culture growth

The first step was to actually check if the construct works: do the transformed yeast strains - with the TRP BB - actually secrete TRP into the medium?

To test this we used the following strains:

• YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2
• YFP_TRPb_PolyWb
• YFP_TRPb
• YFP_TRPa_TRPZipper2
• YFP_TRPa_PolyWb
• YFP_TRPa
• YFP

Protocol

• We started 5ml cultures with 3 replica until they reached exponential phase, overnight, using a -T medium.
• Starting OD for the assay 0.1 (exponential phase).
• We measured OD every hour until they reached an OD: 0.8 (5 hs approximately).
• We measured the Trp signal for each culture medium using the spectrofluorometer.

We used a simple model to measure the export rate for all the strains. Since the cultures are in exponential phase, we take

After a few calculations, we find that

Next we show the average temporal evolution for each strains used,

Figure X. check

Tryptophan secretion at increasing histidine concentrations

We asked ourselves which was the dependance of tryptophan secretion on the amount of histidine in medium. We carried on this test in order to determine the necessary amount of histidine in medium for the start of our system.

Protocol

We started cultures of strains YFP transformed with the tryptophan devices and with an empty plasmid(control)in medium that lacks tryptophan and left the cultures to grow overnight.

After 12 hs, we replaced the medium in each tube for one with increasing concentrations of histidine (dilutions 1X, 1/4; 1/8). We afterwards set cultures at an initial OD: 0.1.

We left the cultures in shaker at 30ºC for 5 hours. After that time, we measured the final OD reached by cultures with the use of a spectrophotometer and amount of tryptophan present in medium with a spectrofluorometer.

Strain characterization

Experimental determination of strains death rate

We set out to determine how long can auxotrophic cells[link] survive in media that lacks both Trytophan and Histidine. These values are the death parameters for CFP and YFP strains used in our model[link]. These were taken as equal in the mathematical analysis for simplicity, we'll test whether this approximation is accurate.

Given that our system most likely will present a lag phase until a certain amount of both AmioAcids is accumulated in the media, will the cells be viable until this occurs? This is a neccesary check of our system's feasability.

Protocol

• We set cultures of the two auxotrophic strains without being transformed (YFP and CFP) in medium –HT at an initial OD of 0.01.
• Each day we plated the same amount of µl of the culture and counted the number of colonies obtain in each plate. We set 3 replica of each strain.

Strain Replica Monday Tuesday Wednesday CFP 1 260 320 285 CFP 2 267 314 76 CFP 3 413 362 278 YFP 1 230 316 688 YFP 2 291 194 524 YFP 3 449 344 725 Table: Number of colonies counted per plate. We expect to see a decrease in the number of colonies - because of cell death. We found that this was not the case, in the experiment's time lapse. However we observed that the size of the colonies was smaller everyday. We can infer from this data that though they have not died, they may have enter into a ...Alan state. 100px 100px FigureX. Growth rate in function of the concentration of Trp and His We aimed to test the growth of the strains in different concentrations of external Trp and His in order to determine the amount of aminoacid at which the culture reaches half of the maximum growth (parameter K in the modeling of our system). We therefore made a series of cultures with increasing concentrations of Trp (Series 1)and His (Series 2). We set the cultures of the different strains at a low initial OD:0.001 with the following scheme: Series 1: strain YFP in each Trp concentration (dilutions 1/32; 1/16; 1/8; 1/4; 1/2; 1x) Series 2: strain CFP in each His concentration (dilutions 1/32; 1/16; 1/8; 1/4; 1/2; 1x) Controls: As control we started cultures of each strain in complete medium. Cultures were left overnight (12 hs) and we measured OD reached with the use of spectrophotometer. RESULTADOS: ANALISIS DE VERO Coculture of transformed strains We did the first experiment to test whether our system works and how two transformed strains grow together. We designed an assay to do so; following the growth of these strains: Strain A Strain B 1 YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 CFP_HIS_PolyHa 2 YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 CFP_HIS 3 YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 4 YFP_TRPb CFP_HIS_PolyHa 5 CFP_HIS_PolyHa 6 YFP_TRPb CFP_HIS 7 CFP_HIS 8 YFP_TRPb Table 1: Transformed cells' coculture and controls. Manu formato! Protocol Starters of strains were grown over night at 30°C, according the following scheme: Strain Media 1 YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 -T 2 YFP_TRPb -T 3 CFP_HIS_PolyHa -H 4 CFP_HIS -H Cultures were sonicated briefly in low power, and OD was measured in order to check they were in exponential phase. Cells were centrifugated and then washed with medium –HT. We set the culture of strains at OD: 0.02 in 5 ml of medium –HT with 3 replica, according to Table 1. At 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 22 hours we took samples of 20 µl. Samples were placed in a 384 wells plate, with 20 µl of cyclohexamide 2x (final concentration 1x) in each of the wells. We used epifluorescence microscope in order to determinate the strain proportion of each coculture. The density of the culture was calculated based on the cell density at in each wells. Graph: 384 wells plate to be used for epifluorescence microscope. Table: Coculture planification for number 1. Table: Coculture planification. Color indicates level of priority of the experiment.