Team:UC Chile/Cyanolux/Project short

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 36: Line 36:
Our model works as a “black box” in which the input takes the form of a specific hour of the day (i.e the hour on which you want your metabolite to reach maximal concentration) and the output is a couple of promoters from Synechocystis genome.  
Our model works as a “black box” in which the input takes the form of a specific hour of the day (i.e the hour on which you want your metabolite to reach maximal concentration) and the output is a couple of promoters from Synechocystis genome.  
It assumes that the metabolite´s production is controlled by enzymes under the control of promoter 1 and it´s degradation by enzimes under promoter 2.
It assumes that the metabolite´s production is controlled by enzymes under the control of promoter 1 and it´s degradation by enzimes under promoter 2.
-
for more details please check (link: mathematical model)
+
for more details please check [2012.igem.org/Team:UC_Chile/Cyanolux/Modelling here]
<h3>Wetlab strategy</h3>
<h3>Wetlab strategy</h3>
-
Having chosen the right promoters we set out to built our constructs to transform synechocystis.
+
Having chosen the right promoters we set out to built our constructs to transform Synechocystis.
As there weren´t straighforward tools to start working with in the registry (i.e characterized plasmids backbones, protocols, etc) we started from scrach.
As there weren´t straighforward tools to start working with in the registry (i.e characterized plasmids backbones, protocols, etc) we started from scrach.
-
We designed two recombination plasmids backbones (link:see results, plasmid construction). One targets a gene essential for our chassis survival in the enviroment (link:see biosafety) and the other one a neutral site.
+
We designed two recombination plasmids backbones One targets a gene essential for our chassis survival in the enviroment (link:see biosafety) and the other one a neutral site.
-
- imagen -
+
[[File:UC_Chile-IntKstrategy | 400px | left]]
-
We planned to insert the LuxAB genes under the right circadian promoter  in the neutral recombnation plasmid
+
[[File:UC_Chile-IntSstrategy | 400px | right]]
-
-imagen?-
+
Our strategy was to insert the LuxAB genes (luciferase) under a circadian promoter with an expression peak right after dusk, in the neutral recombination plasmid; and the LuxCDEG genes (substrate production) with the appropriate promoter in the biosafety plasmid.
-
We planned to insert the LuxCDEG genes under the right circadian promoter  in the neutral in the biosafety plasmid
+
See [https://2012.igem.org/Team:UC_Chile/Cyanolux/Results_short#Plasmid_construction plasmids in results section]
-
 
+
-
-Imagen?-
+
<h2>Implementation</h2>
<h2>Implementation</h2>
Line 63: Line 61:
[https://2012.igem.org/Team:UC_Chile/Cyanolux/Biolamp Full description of the device here]
[https://2012.igem.org/Team:UC_Chile/Cyanolux/Biolamp Full description of the device here]
-
-imagen-
 
<div style="float:right">
<div style="float:right">

Revision as of 01:51, 26 October 2012

Project: Luxilla - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, iGEM 2012