Team:UC Chile/Cyanolux/Future
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Juan Alamos (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{UC_Chile4}} | {{UC_Chile4}} | ||
- | < | + | <h1>Promoters Redesigned</h1> |
- | + | We are designing new versions of our chosen promoters. Now we have changed the promoter construction methodology in terms of the lenght of the upstream sequence considered. | |
+ | Instead of considering just 150-200bp, up to 1000bp will be amplified from Synechocystis genome. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>Transcriptional verification</h1> | ||
+ | Even if our promoters are o.k, colony PCRs can´t tell us wether the transcriptional machinery of our cyanobacteria is recognizing our constructs only . | ||
+ | We are designig new primers to make RT-PCRs that unmistakably verify transcription of the Lux genes at the specified hours. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>Cyrcadian expression characterization</h1> | ||
+ | We have allready built part [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743018 BBa_K743018] to characterize differential expression of sfGFP at different moments of the day. | ||
+ | Other promoters (new ones or those allready built) will be placed by means of Gibson assembly controlling the expression of this reporter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>New Biosafety strategies</h1> | ||
+ | We have allready assembled part [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743010 psb1C3_IntS] wich has a double goal: to insert LuxCDEG genes into Synechocystis and to confere a copper suceptibility that makes this cells unable to thrive in the enviroment. | ||
+ | We are also designing primers to built our [https://2012.igem.org/File:UC_Chile-Animacion-mE-gen.gif new biosafety system ] based on mE genes and MgSO4, wich will be tested as soon as it is ready. | ||
{{UC_Chilefooter}} | {{UC_Chilefooter}} |
Revision as of 03:28, 27 September 2012