"
Team:UC Chile/Cyanolux/Results
From 2012.igem.org
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | This plasmid backbone was constructed by standard assembly techniques. Recombination sites ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743000 BBa_K743000] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743001 Part:BBa_K743001]) were Biobricked by | + | This plasmid backbone was constructed by standard assembly techniques. Recombination sites ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743000 BBa_K743000] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743001 Part:BBa_K743001]) were Biobricked by Gibson assembly and were consenquently ligated to neighboring parts B0015 and KanR in parallel assembly. Afterwards, we ligated both composites through a standard assembly reaction. Final construct was validated by digestion (see gel image at right) and corroborated through sequencing. |
| - | After obtaining [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006 BBa_K743006], we proceeded assembling our constructs through | + | After obtaining [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006 BBa_K743006], we proceeded assembling our constructs through Gibson assemblies. |
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | <i>If you wondering | + | <i>If you wondering why the plasmid was constructed by standard assembly and not by gibson assembly from scratch, please refer to </i> [[Team:UC_Chile/Results/Gibson | Gibson assembly for small parts ]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| - | Starting from [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006| K743006] as a plasmid backbone, we were able to build our LuxAB constructs for the bacterial luciferase using | + | Starting from [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006| K743006] as a plasmid backbone, we were able to build our LuxAB constructs for the bacterial luciferase using two different versions available at the registry (from [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743014 Photorhabdus luminiscent, BBa_K743014] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743015 Vibrio fisherii, BBa_K743015]) under an endogenous Synechocystis's promoter (transaldolase Reference???). Resulting constructs were verified by digestion (see gel images below) and corroborated by sequencing. |
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | pSB1C3_IntS was constructed in two successive | + | pSB1C3_IntS was constructed in two successive Gibson assemblies. The first assembly inserted the CopS region (the entire RS5 & RS6 recombination locus) to a chopped-down pSB1C3 lacking the whole VF2 to VR region. The second assembly inserted the Spectynomycin resistance selection marker and the whole VF to VR region of plasmid pSB4K5-J04450 right in between of the RS5 & RS6 CopS region. This construct yields red colonies if correctly assembled (see image at left). Red colonies were colony PCRed, verificated by digestion (see image down right) and corroborated by sequencing. |
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| - | We have amplified all the parts of the substrate production pathway ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325902 LuxCD] and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325903 LuxEG]) for the final construct under the Pcaa3 promoter (which has also been Biobricked with code [[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743002 K743002]. Also, are amplifying one remaining part (LuxCD with 5' homology to PsigE) | + | We have amplified all the parts of the substrate production pathway ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325902 LuxCD] and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325903 LuxEG]) for the final construct under the Pcaa3 promoter (which has also been Biobricked with code [[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743002 K743002]]. Also, we are amplifying one remaining part (LuxCD with 5' homology to PsigE) to do Gibson assembly of the LuxCDEG construct under PsigE. Gibson reaction will be done along with the substrate production construct under Pcaa3 in pSB1C3_IntS for both constructs. |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | Transformation in Synechocystis takes about | + | Transformation in Synechocystis takes about two weeks to reveal transformant colonies, which in turn have to be restreaked again before PCR verification. This makes working in Synechocystis pressing as mistakes can take long to unravel. |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | It is important to note that to our knowledge we are the first iGEM team to do a succesful direct transformation of Synechocystis PCC. 6803 with naked DNA. | + | <b>It is important to note that to our knowledge we are the first iGEM team to do a succesful direct transformation of Synechocystis PCC. 6803 with naked DNA.</b> |
Revision as of 16:42, 26 September 2012
Contents |
Plasmid Construction
Following our experimental strategy we built two plasmid backbones on which to insert the Lux constructs.
Neutral recombination plasmid
1st lane is 1Kb Ladder. 4th lane is C4; Band at 2300: Digestion intermediate, band at 2000: backbone, band at 1700: RS1-KanR-RS2partial, band at 500: RS2partial.
This plasmid backbone was constructed by standard assembly techniques. Recombination sites ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743000 BBa_K743000] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743001 Part:BBa_K743001]) were Biobricked by Gibson assembly and were consenquently ligated to neighboring parts B0015 and KanR in parallel assembly. Afterwards, we ligated both composites through a standard assembly reaction. Final construct was validated by digestion (see gel image at right) and corroborated through sequencing.
After obtaining [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006 BBa_K743006], we proceeded assembling our constructs through Gibson assemblies.
If you wondering why the plasmid was constructed by standard assembly and not by gibson assembly from scratch, please refer to Gibson assembly for small parts
Insertion of LuxAB genes
Starting from [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006| K743006] as a plasmid backbone, we were able to build our LuxAB constructs for the bacterial luciferase using two different versions available at the registry (from [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743014 Photorhabdus luminiscent, BBa_K743014] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743015 Vibrio fisherii, BBa_K743015]) under an endogenous Synechocystis's promoter (transaldolase Reference???). Resulting constructs were verified by digestion (see gel images below) and corroborated by sequencing.
Lane 1 = Ladder 1Kb, Lane 6 = K743014. Band at 4000: RS1-Pta-LuxABvf-Kan-RS2partial, band at 2000: pSB1C3, band at 500: RS2partial.
Lane 1 = Ladder 1Kb, Lane 3 = K743014. Band at 4000: RS1-Pta-LuxABxl-Kan-RS2partial, band at 2000: pSB1C3, band at 500: RS2partial.
Suceptibility construct
pSB1C3_IntS was constructed in two successive Gibson assemblies. The first assembly inserted the CopS region (the entire RS5 & RS6 recombination locus) to a chopped-down pSB1C3 lacking the whole VF2 to VR region. The second assembly inserted the Spectynomycin resistance selection marker and the whole VF to VR region of plasmid pSB4K5-J04450 right in between of the RS5 & RS6 CopS region. This construct yields red colonies if correctly assembled (see image at left). Red colonies were colony PCRed, verificated by digestion (see image down right) and corroborated by sequencing.
A couple of picked red colonies are shown in this plate.
Insertion of Lux substrate biosynthesis genes under twilight promoters
We have amplified all the parts of the substrate production pathway ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325902 LuxCD] and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325903 LuxEG]) for the final construct under the Pcaa3 promoter (which has also been Biobricked with code http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743002 K743002. Also, we are amplifying one remaining part (LuxCD with 5' homology to PsigE) to do Gibson assembly of the LuxCDEG construct under PsigE. Gibson reaction will be done along with the substrate production construct under Pcaa3 in pSB1C3_IntS for both constructs.
Transforming Synechocystis PCC 6803
Once constructs were corroborated by sequencing, we proceeded to transform synechocystis. Prior to transforming, we verified that our Synechocystis cultures were in exponential growth by comparison to our growth curve characterization.
Transformation in Synechocystis takes about two weeks to reveal transformant colonies, which in turn have to be restreaked again before PCR verification. This makes working in Synechocystis pressing as mistakes can take long to unravel.
This image shows various time points during a Synechocystis PCC. 6803 transformations. Be advised that it is only to be used as a reference of what to expect during the first week of transformation.
LuxABxl under transaldolase promoter transformation
This picture shows the transformation of [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743014 K743014] after 14 days. On the left there is the control transformation plate (no DNA) on Kanamycin 25ug/mL and on the right the succesful transformation of Synechocystis colonies growing througout the Millipore membrane on the same antibiotic.
LuxABvf under transaldolase promoter transformation
It is important to note that to our knowledge we are the first iGEM team to do a succesful direct transformation of Synechocystis PCC. 6803 with naked DNA.
sfGFP with LVA tag for describing circadian behaviour
To describe the circadian behaviour of the promoter we built a fast-degrading reporter consisting of sfGPF I746916 with a LVA degradation tag in the C-terminal end of the protein. This construct will serve as a real-time reporter of promoter activity, you may find more information about the half-life of proteins with the LVA tag [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_M0050 | here]. The construct has been verified by digestion and corroborated by sequencing.
