RESULTS

The T7 transcriptional terminator was tested with both T7 and E. coli tac transcriptional promoters. We found that the apparent transcriptional termination efficiencies for the T7 terminator was 0.915 ± 0.008 and 0.80 ± 0.01 with T7 and E. coli RNA polymerases, respectively (Figure 5). Similar experiments with the E. coli T1 rrnB terminator gave apparent transcriptional termination efficiencies of 0.976 ± 0.005 and 0.985 ± 0.001 with T7 and E. coli RNA polymerases, respectively. The data suggest that the T7 terminator is more sensitive to the RNA polymerase than the E. coli terminator. Further, the E. coli terminator tested is significantly stronger than the tested T7 terminator. The results were obtained from several replicates and by exploring a large window of incubation times. Further details can be found here [[link]].

Figure 5: Transcriptional termination efficiencies of T7 and E. coli terminators with T7 and E. coli RNA polymerases (RNAP).

While collecting the above data, we noticed that the raw fluorescence intensities for mCherry seemed to increase in the presence of the T7 transcriptional terminator when using the T7 RNA polymerase. This effect was previously described by H. Abe and H. Aiba [2]. To further explore this potential influence, we repeated the experiment but this time ensured that all measurements were taken from cultures that were induced at the same optical density (O.D.), more information can be found [here]. The mCherry fluorescence was then analyzed with the following equation, that represent the Relative Increase in the upstream gene expression, where Cs is the intensity of mCherry when followed by the terminator of interest, and Cc is the intensity of mCherry of the control construct that did not contain the terminator. The data showed that the combination of a T7 transcriptional promoter and a T7 transcriptional terminator increased mCherry levels two-fold with respect the same construct in the absence of an intervening terminator. This effect was not observed for the remaining three combinations tested. Since the apparent transcriptional termination efficiencies were calculated as a ratio of mVenus over mCherry levels, an increase in mCherry fluorescence would result in an over estimation of the termination efficiency.
To investigate whether our values were, indeed, over estimated, we calculated raw termination efficiencies from the same samples used for the mCherry measurements. The fluorescence intensities of mVenus were evaluated without considering mCherry emissions with the following equation:

formula

where Vs is the intensity of mVenus when preceded by the terminator of interest, and Vc is the intensity of mVenus control, i.e. in the absence of the preceding terminator.
When the contribution of mCherry was removed, the data suggested that the RNA polymerase did not influence the transcriptional termination efficiency (Figure 6).

Figure 6: The raw termination efficiencies of T7 and E. coli terminators with T7 and E. coli RNA polymerases (RNAP).

One potential reason for the increased mCherry levels could be that the terminator protects the transcript from the activity of cellular RNases. Although RNases would not explain why the effect was only observed for the T7 promoter - T7 terminator combination, we decided to test some of the constructs in a purified system that lacked the presence of nucleases. Therefore, we exploited the PURExpress kit from New England BioLabs, which consists of purified transcription - translation machinery, including T7 RNA polymerase and E. coli ribosomes. First, the data showed that the transcriptional termination efficiencies, both apparent and raw, were significantly lower in the purified, in vitro system for both T7 and E. coli terminators than the data obtained from the in vivo experiments (Figure 7). This is consistent with the fact that T7 lysozyme, which was not present in our in vitro experiments but was present in vivo, aids in transcriptional termination [3]. Second, the stabilization effect was significantly diminished in vitro, suggesting that RNases or other unidentified cellular factors were involved. Some kinetic profiles of the reaction can be found below (Figure 8).

Figure 7: The activity of T7 and E. coli terminators in vitro with purified T7 RNA polymerase and E. coli translation machinery. Left, right and bottom panels show apparent termination efficiencies, raw termination efficiencies, and normalized mCherry expression.

Figure 8: In vitro kinetic measurements. Left panel shows the raw peaks kinetic of BBa_K731700 with T7 terminator, right panel represents the raw termination efficiency kinetic of both terminators.