Team:Goettingen/week13-2

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 547: Line 547:
<li>Observations & Results: <br>
<li>Observations & Results: <br>
Here again a certain diversity in the growth rate could be observed. Whereas some cultures had already reached and optical density of 0.8, others were still at merely 0.04.Here again <i>fliC</i> featured a low density, this time in all strains and DH10B and BL21 show a general decreased growth rate. Striking is the fact that the strains that featured the best motility as well as the construct that seems to have the biggest influence show decreased division rate. Whether this phenomenon is a coincidence or not we are not sure about yet.
Here again a certain diversity in the growth rate could be observed. Whereas some cultures had already reached and optical density of 0.8, others were still at merely 0.04.Here again <i>fliC</i> featured a low density, this time in all strains and DH10B and BL21 show a general decreased growth rate. Striking is the fact that the strains that featured the best motility as well as the construct that seems to have the biggest influence show decreased division rate. Whether this phenomenon is a coincidence or not we are not sure about yet.
-
At the following day (26th of July) as well as the day after (27th of July) the colonies still looked exactly the same. Neither chemotaxis nor swimming could observed. </li>
+
At the following day (26th of July) as well as the day after (27th of July) the colonies still looked exactly the same. Neither chemotaxis nor swimming could observed. Almost a weak later (30th of July) still no swimming or chemotaxis had taken place, solely growth. However, the two colonies that had been applied into the agar not onto featured little swimming. Nevertheless, also these results are lousy considering the long time span.  (</li>
<br></td></tr>
<br></td></tr>
</table>
</table>

Revision as of 20:12, 16 September 2012