Team:Buenos Aires/Results/Strains
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Strain characterization) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Strain characterization == | == Strain characterization == | ||
- | ''' | + | '''a) Description of strains,''' |
Through our experiments we worked with the following strains: | Through our experiments we worked with the following strains: | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TCY 3043 | |TCY 3043 | ||
- | |-H-T | + | |(-H-T) |
|No fluorescence | |No fluorescence | ||
|Negative control | |Negative control | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TCY 3190 | |TCY 3190 | ||
- | |+H-T | + | |(+H-T) |
|YFP + (Induced CFP) | |YFP + (Induced CFP) | ||
|For coculture | |For coculture | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TCY 3265 | |TCY 3265 | ||
- | |-H+T | + | |(-H+T) |
|CFP | |CFP | ||
|For coculture | |For coculture | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
- | ''' | + | '''Table:''' Hystidine (H) and Tryptophane (T) auxotrophies per strain, type of fluorescence and description of most common utilization during the experiments. |
Nearly 15 other similar strains were evaluated and discarded due to several reasons (low screening potentiality; requirement of hormones for fluorescence induction; high reverting rate of auxotrophies, among others) | Nearly 15 other similar strains were evaluated and discarded due to several reasons (low screening potentiality; requirement of hormones for fluorescence induction; high reverting rate of auxotrophies, among others) |
Revision as of 00:37, 16 September 2012
Strain characterization
Strain characterization
a) Description of strains,
Through our experiments we worked with the following strains:
Strain ID | Relevant Auxotrophies | Fluorescence | Used as |
TCY 3043 | (-H-T) | No fluorescence | Negative control |
TCY 3190 | (+H-T) | YFP + (Induced CFP) | For coculture |
TCY 3265 | (-H+T) | CFP | For coculture |
TCY 3154 | CFP +(induced YFP) | Positive Control |
Table: Hystidine (H) and Tryptophane (T) auxotrophies per strain, type of fluorescence and description of most common utilization during the experiments.
Nearly 15 other similar strains were evaluated and discarded due to several reasons (low screening potentiality; requirement of hormones for fluorescence induction; high reverting rate of auxotrophies, among others)