"
Team:UT-Tokyo/Safety
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:If there are more strictly defined rules and evaluations for safety, we believe they will raise the safety level of this competition and be useful in an educational and academic sense. | :If there are more strictly defined rules and evaluations for safety, we believe they will raise the safety level of this competition and be useful in an educational and academic sense. | ||
| + | <!-- 以上自由記述 --> | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| - | + | </div></div><p> | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | </div> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | </div> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| + | {{:Team:UT-Tokyo/Template/Side|twdisp=block}} | ||
| + | <!-- 以下サイドメニュー編集 ;の後には、もしこのページが第2階層にあれば、そのページ内の見出しを羅列。第1階層にあれば、そのカテゴリ内の第2階層ページ名を羅列する。;の後には名称を、:の後にはその説明を記述する。:と;のセットは適当に増減してください --> | ||
| + | ;[[#Safety_Q.26A|Safety Q&A]] | ||
| + | :to answer the questions on the [https://2012.igem.org/Safety safety page.] | ||
| - | + | <!-- ここまでサイドメニュー編集を --> | |
| - | + | <html></p> | |
| - | + | </div> | |
| - | <html> | + | </div><p> |
| - | </div></div> | + | |
</html> | </html> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
{{:Team:UT-Tokyo/Template/Footer|prevfull=Notebook|nextfull=HumanPractice|nextname= HumanPractice|prevname=Notebook}} | {{:Team:UT-Tokyo/Template/Footer|prevfull=Notebook|nextfull=HumanPractice|nextname= HumanPractice|prevname=Notebook}} | ||
Revision as of 03:51, 27 September 2012
Safety
Safety Q&A:
Our answers to the questions posed at https://2012.igem.org/Safety are as follows
Safety Q&A
Our answers to the questions posed at https://2012.igem.org/Safety are as follows:
- 1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
- As long as we conduct experiments following the safety manual of mentioned below (and of course we do follow) and obey the laws on biotechnology when conducting our experiments, we think our ideas raise no safety problems.
Our safety manual is the the safety manual of the School of Engineering [http://safetymanual.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/]. This is internal access only. So, if needed, please see the safety manual of the School of Science [http://www.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/offices/esmo/manual.html], which is similar to that of the School of Engineering. - 2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?
- No. The genes we use this year are cloned from the E. coli JM109 strain and we think our bacteria are no more environmentally harmful nor evolutionarily advantageous than wild type E. coli.
- 3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
- Yes. We work at Noji laboratory, School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo.
There are- Health and Safety Office
- Committee on Genetically Modified Organisms and Microbes for Research
- Research Ethics Committee
- Health and Safety Office
- in the School of Engineering, and there is
- Office for Life Science Research Ethics and Safety [http://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ja/administration/lifescience/]
- in the University of Tokyo.
- 4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
- If there are more strictly defined rules and evaluations for safety, we believe they will raise the safety level of this competition and be useful in an educational and academic sense.
