Team:Slovenia/Idea
From 2012.igem.org
Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>The desired properties of synthetic cellular devices for the next generation of cell-based therapies</b> | ||
+ | <ul style="margin-left:15px;"> | ||
+ | <li>Control over the selection of different states of production of therapeutics or their combinations during different stages of therapy should be possible from the outside by a physician</li> | ||
+ | <li>The ability to inactivate and destroy cells of the device at the end of the therapy, leaving as little remains as possible and elimination of any cells that might have escaped from microcapsules</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
+ | <h2>The synthetic biological components that needed to be developed</h2> | ||
+ | <h3>A Universal orthogonal bistable toggle switch for mammalian cells</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The existing genetic switches used in mammalian cells are mainly based on the available prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, whose number is limited and whose properties may differ, hindering balanced switching. Our idea was to investigate the development of genetic switches based on the designed DNA-binding domains, such as TAL effectors that can achieve high orthogonality and support simultaneous introduction of several toggle switches into mammalian cells. Although designed transcription factors have been created based on modular DNA binding proteins, such as zinc fingers and TAL effectors, to our best knowledge there have been no reports of genetic switches based on these types of elements. These devices would be extremely valuable since we could produce numerous orthogonal switches allowing development of complex functions and therapeutic devices. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- figure 2 --> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <table class="normal"> | ||
+ | <tbody class="normal"> | ||
+ | <tr class="normal"><td class="normal"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/8/8b/SVN12_cell_multiple_switches.jpg"/></td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr class="normal"><td class="normal"><b>Figure 2.</b> Regulation of the several different states of therapeutic cells based on several orthogonal toggle switches.</tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <!-- end figure 2 --> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
+ | <h3>Safety mechanisms for therapy with microencapsulated cells</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | For the safe therapeutic implementation of microencapsulated engineered cells in the organism we envisioned that we should be able to cease the therapy without having to physically remove the capsules. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- figure 3 --> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <table class="normal"> | ||
+ | <tbody class="normal"> | ||
+ | <tr class="normal"><td class="normal"><img width="50%" height="50%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/3b/Svn12_apoptoza_overview.png"/></td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr class="normal"><td class="normal"><b>Figure 3.</b> Safety mechanisms that we planned to introduce for the application of microencapsulated engineered mammalian cells in therapy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <!-- end figure 3 --> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 17:30, 24 September 2012
Idea
For this year's Team Slovenia iGEM project we wanted to exploit the advantages of synthetic biology for an alternative biological medical therapy which could overcome some of the difficulties connected to current biopharmaceuticals.
Each disease and its corresponding therapy is a story of its own, but we sought to design a synthetic biological solution for drug application that could be used to treat different diseases and include safety components that could be useful in different therapeutic applications.
Our solution was to engineer mammalian cells, so that they will produce and deliver biological drugs inside the organism, as if the drugs were produced by the host cells themselves. Within the engineered cells, we planned to incorporate genetic switches allowing controlled production of one or several desired therapeutics, depending on the stage of the disease. The engineered cells are incorporated in microcapsules that may be implanted into the affected tissue to ensure an immune-privileged environment for the therapeutic cells. The semi-permeable capsules allow the flux of nutrients and effector molecules through the capsule’s pores but prevent cell escape and dissemination throughout the body. For the unlikely case of cells escaping capsules, we designed a safety tag ensuring destruction of cells outside microcapsules by the patient's immune system. This form of therapy may be terminated at any given time by an outside signal inducing microcapsule degradation and therapeutic cell apoptosis in which case no traces of the exogenous material should remain in the tissue.
The main features of our proposed therapeutic device:
|
Figure 1. Microencapsulated engineered cells in synthetic biology for the production and delivery of biological therapeutics. |
An important advantage of the microencapsulated cell approach is that the therapeutic protein can reach the therapeutic local concentrations in the affected tissue, while maintaining a low systemic concentration, thus avoiding systemic side effects, such as systemic immunosupression. Production of protein therapeutics by cells can also eliminate the need for the repeated invasive administration of therapeutics, which are typically applied by injections. Repeated application of therapeutics into the liver, brain or other complex tissues, where local delivery could be beneficial, is quite difficult. We aimed to develop an implantable cellular device for the local, regulated and safe delivery of therapeutic proteins. The usual obvious solution would be gene therapy, which has, despite its early promises, not delivered many successful clinical applications because of the problems of viral delivery and variable effectiveness due to the random site of integration. Long term survival of encapsulated cells beyond months may be problematic and their efficiency may decrease, therefore we should focus on the therapy of acute conditions.
The desired properties of synthetic cellular devices for the next generation of cell-based therapies- Control over the selection of different states of production of therapeutics or their combinations during different stages of therapy should be possible from the outside by a physician
- The ability to inactivate and destroy cells of the device at the end of the therapy, leaving as little remains as possible and elimination of any cells that might have escaped from microcapsules
The synthetic biological components that needed to be developed
A Universal orthogonal bistable toggle switch for mammalian cells
The existing genetic switches used in mammalian cells are mainly based on the available prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, whose number is limited and whose properties may differ, hindering balanced switching. Our idea was to investigate the development of genetic switches based on the designed DNA-binding domains, such as TAL effectors that can achieve high orthogonality and support simultaneous introduction of several toggle switches into mammalian cells. Although designed transcription factors have been created based on modular DNA binding proteins, such as zinc fingers and TAL effectors, to our best knowledge there have been no reports of genetic switches based on these types of elements. These devices would be extremely valuable since we could produce numerous orthogonal switches allowing development of complex functions and therapeutic devices.
Figure 2. Regulation of the several different states of therapeutic cells based on several orthogonal toggle switches. |
Safety mechanisms for therapy with microencapsulated cells
For the safe therapeutic implementation of microencapsulated engineered cells in the organism we envisioned that we should be able to cease the therapy without having to physically remove the capsules.
Figure 3. Safety mechanisms that we planned to introduce for the application of microencapsulated engineered mammalian cells in therapy. |