From 2012.igem.org

Latest revision as of 03:55, 27 October 2012

• iGEM BsAs
  • The team
  • Official roster
  • Members
  • Where we come from

  • Safety
  • Key questions

  • Attributions
  • Attributions

  • Sponsors
  • Institutional

  Data Page
• Project
  • Synthetic ecology
  • Overview
  • Motivation
  • Design
  • Possible applications

  • Schemes
  • Crossfeeding
  • Independent Population Control
  • Cross-population control
  • Stochastic State Transitions

  • Modeling
  • Modeling synEcology
  • Advanced modeling

  Data Page
• Results and Devices
  • Strains characterization
  • Strains description
  • Fluorescence screening
  • Screening of strain proportion
  • Auxotrophy confirmation
  • Coculture in liquid medium
  • Revertant control
  • Trp basal production
  • Growth dependence

  • BBs design
  • Trp/His export devices
  • Backup devices
  • Preparing for sending

  • Testing
  • BioBricks testing
  • SynEco testing

  Data Page
• Human practices
  • Garage Lab
  • Spreading the word
  • Solving local problems

  • EMBO
  • Seeding SynBio in Latin America

  Data Page

After the Jamboree!

DEVICE TESTING

https://2012.igem.org/Team:Buenos_Aires/Results/DevicesTesting

SYNECO TESTING

https://2012.igem.org/Team:Buenos_Aires/Results/SynEcoTesting

When we returned from the Latin America Jamboree we focused all our efforts on completing the neccesary transformations to test our devices and our project as a whole.

We devided this task in three sections

Week 1&2 : Yeast expression vectors & Transformations

In order to construct the yeast expression plasmids we choosed 3 vectors, 2 with a tryptophan marker and 1 with an histidine marker:

1. pCM182/5, which are centromeric plasmids with TRP1 marker, and with a doxycycline repressible promoter [Gari et al 1996].
2. pEG202, with a 2 ori, HIS3 marker and a constitutive promoter (PADH1).

340px

The cloning we did was:

Protocol

1. Digestion of plasmids and TRP/HIS export device:
   1. pCM182; pCM 185; BBa_K792010 y BBa_K792012 were digested with BamHI and Pst1 restriction enzymes.
   2. pEG202; BBa_K792009 y BBa_K792011 were digested with BamHI and Not1.
2. Purification of digested vectors (pCM185; pCM182; pEG202)
3. Ligation of vectors and devices according the anterior table (T4 ligase protocol, overnight)
4. Transformation of E. Coli DH5a with the ligation products. Bacterias were plated on LB-agar with Ampicillin, and incubated over night at 37 °C.
5. Colonies were used for liquid cultures (LB + Ampicillin) and minipreps were made.
6. Constructions (vector + insert) were checked by digestion with restriction enzymes, and 1%-agarose gel (1kb and 100bp as markers).

Once obtained the desired constructions, we transformed yeast strains:

1. TCY3081: W303, bar1-, ura3::PAct1-YFP
2. TCY3128: W303, bar1-, leu2:: Pprm1-CFP 405

We got the following transformed strains:

Name YFP_TRPa_TRPZipper2 Strain TCY3081 (YFP) Plasmid pCM182 (TRPa) + <partinfo>BBa_K792010</partinfo> (TRPZipper2)

Name YFP_TRPa_PoliWb Strain TCY3081 (YFP) Plasmid pCM182 (TRPa) + <partinfo>BBa_K792012</partinfo> (PoliWb)

Name YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 Strain TCY3081 (YFP) Plasmid pCM185 (TRPb) + <partinfo>BBa_K792010</partinfo> (TRPZipper2)

Name YFP_TRPb_PoliWb Strain TCY3081 (YFP) Plasmid pCM185 (TRPb) + <partinfo>BBa_K792012</partinfo> (PoliWb)

Name CFP_HIS_PoliHa Strain TCY3128 (CFP) Plasmid pEG202 (HIS) + <partinfo>BBa_K792009</partinfo> (PoliHa)

Name CFP_HIS_PoliHb Strain TCY3128 (CFP) Plasmid pEG202 (HIS) + <partinfo>BBa_K792011</partinfo> (PoliHb)

Week 3: Synthetic Ecology Characterization

Our task is to characterize our system including the devices functioning. We want specifically to:

1. Quantify the export of Trp as proof that the devices work
2. Determine experimentally some of the parameters that we used in the model
3. Characterize the growth of the transformed strains in coculture

In order to characterize the devices that we used to transform our strains we came up with the series of assays that we describe below.

Devices characterization

Secretion Rate of Trp as a function of culture growth

The first step was to actually check if the construct works: do the transformed yeast strains - with the tryptophan devices- actually secrete tryptophan into the medium?

To test this we used the following strains:

YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2 YFP_TRPb_PolyWb YFP_TRPb	YFP
YFP_TRPa_TRPZipper2 YFP_TRPa_PolyWb YFP_TRPa

Protocol

• We started 5ml cultures with 3 replica until they reached exponential phase, overnight, using a -T medium.
• Starting OD for the assay 0.1 (exponential phase).
• We measured OD every hour until they reached an OD: 0.8 (5 hs approximately).
• We measured the Trp signal for each culture medium using the spectrofluorometer.

NOTE: The fluorescence meausurements taken for the Tryptophan in the medium, take into account both the aminoacid secreted by the device and the one diffused.

Therefore the secretion rates calculated will be higher than the actual ones. We used an empty plasmid as control to study tryptophan diffusion.

We used a simple model to measure the secretion rate for all the strains. Since the cultures are in exponential phase, we take

After a few calculations, we find that

Results

Next we show the average OD for each strains used, needed to calculate the secretation rates of Trytophan.

Figure X. check

Figure X. check

Tryptophan secretion at increasing histidine concentrations

We asked ourselves which was the dependance of tryptophan secretion on the amount of histidine in medium. We carried on this test in order to determine whether the secretion of tryptophan depends on the concentration of another aminoacid in the media, such as histidine and what would be the necessary amount of histidine in medium for the start of our system.

In this experiment we used strains:

YFP_TRPb_TRPZipper2	YFP_TRPb_PolyWb	YFP_TRPb (control)

Protocol

1. Starters of each strain used were grown over night in -T media, at 30 °C in shaker.
2. After 12 hs, cells were pelleted and washed with -HT media.
3. Cultures with increasing concentrations of histidine (0X, 1X, 1/4X and 1/16X) were set at an initial OD: 0.1, for each strain with 2 replica.
4. We left the cultures in shaker at 30ºC for 5 hours. After that time, we measured the final OD reached by cultures with the use of a spectrophotometer and the amount of tryptophan present in medium with a spectrofluorometer.

Results

Strain characterization

Experimental determination of strains death rate

We set out to determine how long can auxotroph cells[link] survive in media that lacks both Trytophan and Histidine. These values are the death parameters for CFP and YFP strains used in our model[link]. These were taken as equal in the mathematical analysis for simplicity but now we would like to test whether this approximation is accurate.

Given that our system most likely will present a lag phase until a certain amount of both AmioAcids is accumulated in the media, will the cells be viable until this occurs? This is a neccesary check of our system's feasability.

Protocol

For this experiment we used

YFP Strain	CFP Strain

• We set cultures of the two auxotroph strains without being transformed (YFP and CFP) in medium –HT at an initial OD of 0.01.
• Each day we plated the same amount of µl of the culture and counted the number of colonies obtain in each plate. We set 3 replica of each strain.

Result

Table: Number of colonies counted per plate.

We expect to see a decrease in the number of colonies - because of cell death. We found that this was not the case, in the experiment's time lapse. However we observed that the size of the colonies was smaller everyday as can be seen in the following pictures.

We can infer from this data that though they have not died, they may have enter into a ...Alan state. In this way cells can survive for a period of time in media defficient in amino acid (at least, during the time course of our experiment), but grow slower. Probably this would require more time than 3 days to observe significative cell dying.

FigureX.

Growth dependence on the Trp and His concentration

An important thing in order to characterize the system is the dependence of the growth rate on the culture with the concentration of the crossfeeding aminoacids, tryptophane (Trp) and histidine (His).

This would allow us to estimate one of the parameters used in our model (the EC50, which is the amount of aminoacid at which the culture reaches half of the maximum growth).

Protocol

1. For this experiment we would use strains YFP and CFP (non-transformed, without devices). We started cultures of 5 ml of initial OD: 0.025 for:

2. Cultures would be left overnight (12 hs) at 30°C with agitation and we measured OD reached with the use of spectrophotometer.

Results

To be done with our strains soon.

Coculture of transformed strains

We did the first experiment to test whether our system works and how two transformed strains grow together.

We designed an assay to do so; following the growth of these strains:

CFP_His	YFP_TRPb

Protocol

384 wells plate to be used for epifluorescence microscope.

Results