Team:Cornell/project/drylab/components
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
R.Lizarralde (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Reactors</h3> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Filtration</h3> |
- | + | br> | |
+ | <h4>Requirements</h4> | ||
+ | From an environmental safety perspective, the filters were one of the most important components. We required | ||
+ | filters which could completely prevent microbes from entering or leaving the system. This constraint requires | ||
+ | extremely reliable, and ultrapurifcation quality filters. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design</h4> | ||
+ | After researching, we ultimately chose the SWT 0.1 Micron Absolute Rated Filter. Given the diameter of most | ||
+ | bacteria ranges from 0.2-2.0 micron, and the absolute 100% rating of the filter, the filter easily qualified. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Materials</h4> | ||
+ | The filter cartridges are composed of 100% polypropylene membranes which have a failure rating of 65 PSI. | ||
+ | Additionally, their lifetime are rated at 200 gallons, which equates to nearly 5 years of continuous operation | ||
+ | at 0.3 ml/min. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly</h4> | ||
+ | The filters were housed in a polycarbonate framing with threading leading to an inlet and outlet stream. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Pumps</h3> |
- | + | <br> | |
+ | <h4>Requirements</h4> | ||
+ | Continuous monitoring requires a steady inflow of sample fluid to be supplied to the bioreactor. Given an | ||
+ | operational lifespan of at least 6 months using battery power supplemented with solar also required a low | ||
+ | power draw. Finally the flow rates required for a 100 ml continuous flow reactor are less than 1 ml/min. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design</h4> | ||
+ | After researching low power draw pumps, we decided on the Bartels Mikrotechnik mp6 Micropump. The pump uses two | ||
+ | extremely small actuators which increase the flow of the fluid with a greater frequency supplied to the pump. | ||
+ | Since the flow rates are so small, the pressure head associated with the filters does not exceed the 600 mbar | ||
+ | maximum. A mp6-EVA electronic controller was also purchased from Bartels which allows external tuning of flow rate. | ||
+ | The original controller can only be supplied with at 2.5-5 V voltage source, so a step-down was necessary to be | ||
+ | compatible with the battery inside the device. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Material</h4> | ||
+ | Contamination and corrosion are always a concern in continuous operation. A benefit of the mp6 micropump is that | ||
+ | all surface in contact with the fluid is PPSU (polyphenylsulfone) , a heat and chemical resistant plastic. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly</h4> | ||
+ | The micropumps were received in June to perform autoclaving testing on the parts. In October, after the remainder | ||
+ | of the device was assembled, the micro pumps were put online in the device and confirmed the ability to supply | ||
+ | continuous flow through the entire device including the two filters, mixer, reactor and piping. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="three columns"> | <div class="three columns"> | ||
Line 83: | Line 122: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Piping and Instrumentation</h3> |
+ | <h4>Requirements</h4> | ||
+ | To connect each component of the system including the filters, food tanks, sample ports, and | ||
+ | mixer requires a leak-proof, durable system. Additionally we required methods to calibrate the | ||
+ | flow rate of the fluids throughout the device, so pressure gauges and flow meters are necessary. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design</h4> | ||
+ | After several drafts, our ultimate design was combination of 304/316 stainless steel piping, valves, | ||
+ | and adapters. FEP durable plastic tubing was used for connections between filters and ports which | ||
+ | require flexibility when servicing or reparing the device. A stainless steel in-line passive mixer was | ||
+ | included to avoid power drains from mechanical mixing. Two pressure gauges were included along the wetted | ||
+ | path to provide readings for calibration. Two 0.01-4 ml/min flow meters were added as well. The fluid can | ||
+ | be diverted from the calibration system using a 3-way diverter valves. Precision needle valves were included | ||
+ | after the feed out from both micropumps to control flow rate. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Materials</h4> | ||
+ | Both stainless-steel and fluorinated ethylene propylene plastics are sturdy and corrosion resistant. All fittings in the system were also 304/316 stainless steel. In summary, | ||
+ | these components allow an extremely tight-fitting system which should avoid leaks for extended operations | ||
+ | <br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 89: | Line 146: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Food Tanks</h3> |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Requirements:</h4> | ||
+ | Food storage vessels for long-term field deployment must be durable, corrosion resistant, and autoclavable to | ||
+ | prevent initial contamination. To avoid damage to electronic components necessitates a leak-proof design. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design:</h4> | ||
+ | A battery of six one liter cylinders was chosen for its modularity and ease of fabrication. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Material Selection:</h4> | ||
+ | The choice of materials depended on the cost and durability of that material. Since we have | ||
+ | had prior experience with polycarbonate, we decided it would be best to continue to use | ||
+ | polycarbonate as the material for the containers. Polypropylene was used for the end caps | ||
+ | because it was chemically resistant and cheap. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly:</h4> | ||
+ | The food tanks were all machined in-house at the Rhodes Hall Machine shop. The | ||
+ | polycarbonate clear tubing was glued together with the polypropylene via a super silicone | ||
+ | sealant adhesive to form a clean and strong seal. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 103: | Line 178: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Housing</h3> |
- | + | <br> | |
+ | <h4>Requirements: </h4> | ||
+ | The requirements that we found necessary for the chassis to operate were keeping it water-proof and impact resistant. Ultimate deployment would be in harsh environments and necessitates protective measures to prevent water supply from damaging electronic components | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design: </h4> | ||
+ | The design went through several iterations during the semester. After multiple home-design options, we concluded a Pelican heavy duty case would provide the support and safety we required. Not only was it sturdy and water-proof, but it was also large enough to be buoyant in water with up to 180 lbs of load. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Material Selection: </h4> | ||
+ | The polycarbonate material for the Pelican case was ideal in terms of stress and other parameters to handle the harsh wilderness. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly: </h4> | ||
+ | Modifications to the Pelican case were performed to meet the of electrical components and supply of water samples to device. A 15 W solar panel was retrofitted to the lid of the case to provide replenish power supply. Inlet/outlet ports were drilled to allow piping system coming out of the top to serve as inlet and outlet ports for the water to enter and exit the device. A joint piece between the solar panel and power adapter was fabricated to serve as waterproofing connections from the Pelican case. Aluminium honey-comb plating was included and cut to size using water-jetting to act as both a housing for food tanks and batteries, and provide structural suppor. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Power</h3><br> |
+ | <h4>Requirements</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | To be deployable for the of target six months of operations requires an autonomous electrical source | ||
+ | in the wild without human repair or maintenance, recharge and store energy for extended periods of time. | ||
+ | A rugged device must also be able to survive bear attacks and tree falls, all while being environmentally | ||
+ | friendly and light enough to allow for floatation. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design</h4> | ||
+ | After a series of designs, we chose a LPG Series gel electrolyte valve-regulated lead acid battery | ||
+ | (LPG12-100) from Leoch with a 15W mono-crystalline solar power panel from Instapark. While lead acid | ||
+ | batteries have the highest charge time and the lowest specific energy density, they are by far the | ||
+ | most reliable and durable batteries. Commonly used in boats and in conjunction with solar systems, | ||
+ | they are reliably sealed, well characterized, and easy to charge and operate with microcontrollers and | ||
+ | other complex circuitry. With a wide operating temperature, the model is also insensitive to occasional | ||
+ | deep discharge and has a high charge acceptance, key features for unpredictable solar recharge conditions | ||
+ | in the field. It is shock and vibration resistant and can be used in any orientation. Out of all the proposed | ||
+ | systems, this model also provided the best current output and voltage necessary to power the rest of our | ||
+ | mechanical and electrical parts. It also came cheap. The maximum current draw of the battery is 0.89A and | ||
+ | was shipped with a 12V charger controller, which prevents overcharging. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Materials</h4> | ||
+ | We were greatly concerned with the toxicity of some gel lead acid batteries, which is why our initial | ||
+ | prototype actually did not feature one. However, other less toxic battery systems are not as robust and | ||
+ | have a smaller operating temperature range, with some prone to short-circuiting. Valve-regulated and | ||
+ | tightly sealed, all components of the LPG12-100 are fully recycle and specially designed for outdoor usage. | ||
+ | The solar power panel has its mono-crystalline solar cells embedded in transparent vinyl acetate behind | ||
+ | tempered glass with heavy back sheet. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly</h4> | ||
+ | We would like to give a special thanks to Professor Bruce Land, a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Electrical | ||
+ | and Computer Engineering at Cornell, for his advice and guidance. The battery was easily integrated into the | ||
+ | chassis of the device without alterations. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 123: | Line 242: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | <h3> | + | <h3>Electronics</h3> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 129: | Line 248: | ||
<div class="row last-ele"> | <div class="row last-ele"> | ||
<div class="nine columns"> | <div class="nine columns"> | ||
- | + | <h3>Software</h3> | |
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Requirements</h4> | ||
+ | The method of data transfer had to be easily fixed, and supportive of some long distance information transfer. | ||
+ | The first criterion is due to the nature of the biosensor. Since the device would ideally be outside braving the | ||
+ | weathers for six months, we need it to be quickly replaced. Furthermore, the biosensor had to be able to transmit | ||
+ | data; it would be inconvenient if someone had to frequently go to the device to check the voltage readings. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Design</h4> | ||
+ | An Android phone was chosen as the best fit for the project as it satisfied both requirements. Notably, it achieved | ||
+ | the distance criterion well – as long as a cell tower was nearby, the information on the phone could be accessed from | ||
+ | anywhere with an internet connection. Furthermore, there existed a wide range of support for Android development that | ||
+ | did not exist for other platforms. These included tools such as the Apache API, a light weight server interface that | ||
+ | allowed the project to run more smoothly. | ||
+ | A server was also designed to partner with the Android device. The server was to use a MySQL table for data retrieval | ||
+ | and access - this allowed for easy testing and modularity. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Components</h4> | ||
+ | The choice of materials were generally the industry standard – we used the HTTP protocol to facilitate data transfer | ||
+ | and MySQL to store the data. For the phone, Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus was chosen mostly because of the third-party support | ||
+ | found for the phone concerning the Android to Arduino communication. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Assembly</h4> | ||
+ | The code for the Android device was written in Java using a Microbridge project as the method of communication between | ||
+ | the phone and Arduino. The basic Apache API was used to transfer data to a web server. For the server, the code was | ||
+ | written in PHP and tested with WAMPserver, a development tool that allowed local hosting of the MySQL tables. | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 23:18, 26 October 2012
-
Dry Lab
- How It Works
- Functional Requirements
- Components
- Modeling
- Device Status
- 3D Model