Team:KAIST Korea/Home iGEM
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/8/89/KAIST_DongDong.png" style="float:left;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/8/89/KAIST_DongDong.png" style="float:left;"> | ||
- | <div style="margin-left:110px;"> | + | <div style="margin-left:110px;"></br></br> |
<b>Donghui</b>: Today, one of my friends asked about synthetic biology but I couldn’t answer it specifically. What do you guys think synthetic biology is? | <b>Donghui</b>: Today, one of my friends asked about synthetic biology but I couldn’t answer it specifically. What do you guys think synthetic biology is? | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/66/KAIST_SulSul.png" style="float:left;"> | ||
+ | <div style="margin-left:110px;"></br></br> | ||
+ | <b>SullI</b>: I think the term ‘synthetic biology’ is somewhat paradoxical. I don’t feel comfortable with this term… Maybe it is a misnamed field of biology. Synthetic? Biology? I don’t feel any consistency between them. It is like a mutant in vast biological field since it doesn’t seem synthetic biology is a part of biology but rather close to an engineering field. It is not a natural science to me. To do something related to ‘synthetic’, scientists have to do lots of research and here, they have to consider the ‘biological theory’ part. This one is the most confusing part that makes me and other people hard to determine ‘What is synthetic biology’. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{:Team:KAIST_Korea/footer}} | {{:Team:KAIST_Korea/footer}} |
Revision as of 21:03, 26 October 2012
2012 KAIST Korea
Mail : kaist.igem.2012@gmail.com
Twitter : twitter.com/KAIST_iGEM_2012
Facebook : www.facebook.com/KAISTiGEM2012
Home : iGEM
iGEM Competition?
What is synthetic biology?
Donghui: Today, one of my friends asked about synthetic biology but I couldn’t answer it specifically. What do you guys think synthetic biology is?
SullI: I think the term ‘synthetic biology’ is somewhat paradoxical. I don’t feel comfortable with this term… Maybe it is a misnamed field of biology. Synthetic? Biology? I don’t feel any consistency between them. It is like a mutant in vast biological field since it doesn’t seem synthetic biology is a part of biology but rather close to an engineering field. It is not a natural science to me. To do something related to ‘synthetic’, scientists have to do lots of research and here, they have to consider the ‘biological theory’ part. This one is the most confusing part that makes me and other people hard to determine ‘What is synthetic biology’.