Team:Slovenia/TheSwitchControls
From 2012.igem.org
Strazkosann (Talk | contribs) |
Strazkosann (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 458: | Line 458: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
- | <p>We | + | <p> |
+ | We improved the induction system we previously used (link mutual repressor) by placing the binding sites upstream of the promoter and by fusing CL1-PEST degradation tags to TAL effectors. Before using them in our TAL-based switches we had to determine their functionality. To test them we cotransfected inducible repressors with a reporter and observed the repression with and without the addition of the appropriate inducer. The tests show strong repression of the reporter upon induction, confirming that the inducible TAL repressor is expressed and functions as expected. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
Line 525: | Line 527: | ||
<table width="95%" align="center"> | <table width="95%" align="center"> | ||
<tr width="100%"> | <tr width="100%"> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<td style="padding-right:10px;" width="60%" valign="top"> | <td style="padding-right:10px;" width="60%" valign="top"> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<table width="100%" align="center"> | <table width="100%" align="center"> | ||
<tr width="100%"> | <tr width="100%"> | ||
Line 546: | Line 544: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<td valign="top" style="padding-left:10px;"><img width="100%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/cc/Svn12_ctrl_4b.png | <td valign="top" style="padding-left:10px;"><img width="100%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/cc/Svn12_ctrl_4b.png | ||
"></td> | "></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
- | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
<p>In order to investigate the leakage of minimal promoters in the switch, we performed two controls that included the plasmids of one or the other state of the switch but no induction system. | <p>In order to investigate the leakage of minimal promoters in the switch, we performed two controls that included the plasmids of one or the other state of the switch but no induction system. | ||
We observed flourescence corresponding to the transfected plasmids in few cells, indicating some promoter leakage. Even though we determined a minimal leakage of the minimal promoter this minimal promoter leakage can nevertheless initiate transcription of the activator which in turn triggers the positive feedback loop and causes further activation of the system and expression of the reporter. Leakage of the minimal promoter and amplification of gene expression were detected for both states of the switch which also indicates that there is no difference if the fluorescent reporter protein is linked to an activator or to a repressor. | We observed flourescence corresponding to the transfected plasmids in few cells, indicating some promoter leakage. Even though we determined a minimal leakage of the minimal promoter this minimal promoter leakage can nevertheless initiate transcription of the activator which in turn triggers the positive feedback loop and causes further activation of the system and expression of the reporter. Leakage of the minimal promoter and amplification of gene expression were detected for both states of the switch which also indicates that there is no difference if the fluorescent reporter protein is linked to an activator or to a repressor. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 1 --> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <h3>Illustration of the readout of results of the flow cytometry with transiently transfected mammalian cells that are able to produce two fluorescent reporters. | ||
+ | </h3> | ||
+ | <hr color="gray"/> | ||
+ | <table width="80%" align="center"> | ||
+ | <tr > | ||
+ | <td width="50%" valign="middle" style="padding-right:10px; padding-top:40px;"><img width="100%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/23/Svn12_ctrl_5a.png | ||
+ | "></td> | ||
+ | <td width="50%" valign="middle" style="padding-left:10px; " ><img width="100%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/f1/Svn12_ctrl_5b.png | ||
+ | "></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr > | ||
+ | <td width="50%" valign="top" style="padding-right:10px;"><p><b>Schematic representation of populations of cells transfected with the switch as measured by flow cytometry.</b> Upper left quadrant (Q1): cells producing only BFP; lower right quadrant (Q3): cells producing only mCitrine; right top quadrant (Q2): cells producing both BFP and mCitrine; lower left quadrant (Q4): nontransfected cells and cells that produce neither BFP nor mCitrine. The efficiency of mammalian cell transfection was typicaly between 30-50%. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p></td> | ||
+ | <td width="50%" valign="top" style="padding-left:30px;"><p><b>Nontransfected cells.</b> | ||
+ | </p></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
Revision as of 18:25, 26 October 2012
Controls
Inducible TAL regulators.
Erythromycin induces the expression of a TAL repressor, which represses a luciferase reporter. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with transfection control (10 ng Renilla luciferase), [AB]_PCMV_fLuc reporter and ETR_PCMV_PEST-CL1-TALA:KRAB (both 10 ng) and E:KRAB (100 ng). Two hours post-transfection the cells were stimulated with 2 µg/ml erythromycin. |
Pristinamycin induces the expression of a TAL repressor, which represses a luciferase reporter. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with transfection control (10 ng Renilla luciferase), [AB]_PCMV_fLuc reporter and PIR_PCMV_PEST-CL1-TALA:KRAB (borh 10 ng) and PIP:KRAB (100 ng). Two hours post-transfection the cells were stimulated with 2 µg/ml pristinamycin. |
We improved the induction system we previously used (link mutual repressor) by placing the binding sites upstream of the promoter and by fusing CL1-PEST degradation tags to TAL effectors. Before using them in our TAL-based switches we had to determine their functionality. To test them we cotransfected inducible repressors with a reporter and observed the repression with and without the addition of the appropriate inducer. The tests show strong repression of the reporter upon induction, confirming that the inducible TAL repressor is expressed and functions as expected.
Specificity of TAL effectors.
TAL activator specifically recognizes its corresponding DNA-binding site. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with transfection control PCMV_ mCherry (10 ng), PCMV_TALA:VP16 [a,b] or PCMV_TALB:VP16 (c) and reporter [AB]_PCMV_mCit (a), [CB]_PCMV_mCit (b), or [AC]_PCMV_mCit (all 10 ng) (b). Fluorescence was detected only in cells cotransfected with the specific TAL effector and its corresponding DNA-binding site (a), while cross-reactivity with multiple copies of other binding sites was not observed (b and c). |
For the switch to function properly, all of TAL effectors need to exhibit high specificity and orthogonality. We tested different combinations of TAL operons and TAL activators (Figure) to control for any cross-reactivity and binding specificity. When a reporter under the TAL operon was cotransfected with its matching TAL activator, fluorescence was detected. When the transfected reported plasmid‘s operon did not match the cotransfected TAL activator, no flourescence was detected even if it contained 10 copies of two other TAL binding sites. This demonstrates that TAL regulators bind and exert activity specifically at their binding sites and high degree of orthogonality.
Test of minimal promoter leakage amplified by autoactivator.
[A]_PMIN_TALB:KRAB, [A]_PMIN_TALA:VP16_t2A_BFP (both 20 ng) |
[B]_PMIN_TALA:KRAB_t2A_mCitrine, [B]_PMIN_TALB:VP16, (all 20 ng) |
In order to investigate the leakage of minimal promoters in the switch, we performed two controls that included the plasmids of one or the other state of the switch but no induction system. We observed flourescence corresponding to the transfected plasmids in few cells, indicating some promoter leakage. Even though we determined a minimal leakage of the minimal promoter this minimal promoter leakage can nevertheless initiate transcription of the activator which in turn triggers the positive feedback loop and causes further activation of the system and expression of the reporter. Leakage of the minimal promoter and amplification of gene expression were detected for both states of the switch which also indicates that there is no difference if the fluorescent reporter protein is linked to an activator or to a repressor.
Test of bistability of the positive feedback loop.
|
In order to investigate the leakage of minimal promoters in the switch, we performed two controls that included the plasmids of one or the other state of the switch but no induction system. We observed flourescence corresponding to the transfected plasmids in few cells, indicating some promoter leakage. Even though we determined a minimal leakage of the minimal promoter this minimal promoter leakage can nevertheless initiate transcription of the activator which in turn triggers the positive feedback loop and causes further activation of the system and expression of the reporter. Leakage of the minimal promoter and amplification of gene expression were detected for both states of the switch which also indicates that there is no difference if the fluorescent reporter protein is linked to an activator or to a repressor.
Illustration of the readout of results of the flow cytometry with transiently transfected mammalian cells that are able to produce two fluorescent reporters.
Schematic representation of populations of cells transfected with the switch as measured by flow cytometry. Upper left quadrant (Q1): cells producing only BFP; lower right quadrant (Q3): cells producing only mCitrine; right top quadrant (Q2): cells producing both BFP and mCitrine; lower left quadrant (Q4): nontransfected cells and cells that produce neither BFP nor mCitrine. The efficiency of mammalian cell transfection was typicaly between 30-50%. |
Nontransfected cells. |