From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 15:55, 26 October 2012

• iGEM BsAs
  • The team
  • Official roster
  • Members
  • Where we come from

  • Safety
  • Key questions

  • Attributions
  • Attributions

  • Sponsors
  • Institutional

  Data Page
• Project
  • Synthetic ecology
  • Overview
  • Motivation
  • Design
  • Possible applications

  • Schemes
  • Crossfeeding
  • Independent Population Control
  • Cross-population control
  • Stochastic State Transitions

  • Modeling
  • Modeling synEcology
  • Advanced modeling

  Data Page
• Results and Devices
  • Strains characterization
  • Strains description
  • Fluorescence screening
  • Screening of strain proportion
  • Auxotrophy confirmation
  • Coculture in liquid medium
  • Revertant control
  • Trp basal production
  • Growth dependence

  • BBs design
  • Trp/His export devices
  • Backup devices
  • Preparing for sending

  • Testing
  • BioBricks testing
  • SynEco testing

  Data Page
• Human practices
  • Garage Lab
  • Spreading the word
  • Solving local problems

  • EMBO
  • Seeding SynBio in Latin America

  Data Page

After the Jamboree!

When we returned from the LatinAmerican Jamboree we focused all our effords on completing the neccesary transformations to test our devices and our projet as a whole.

We devided this task in three sections

Week 1&2 : Yeast expression vectors & Transformations

Week 3: synthetic Ecology Characterization

xxoo

BB characterization

xxoo

Secretion Rate of Trp as a function of culture growth

The first step was to actually check if the construct works: do the transformed yeast strains - with the TRP BB - actually secrete TRP into the medium?

To test this we used the following strains:

• YFP_TRP+++_TRPZipper
• YFP_TRP+++_PolyWb
• YFP_TRP+++
• YFP_TRP+_TRPZipper
• YFP_TRP+_PolyWb
• YFP_TRP+
• YFP

Protocol

• We started 5ml cultures with 3 replica until they reached exponential phase, overnight, using a -T medium.
• Starting OD for the assay 0.1 (exponential phase).
• We measured OD every hour until they reached an OD: 0.8 (5 hs approximately).
• We measured the Trp signal for each culture medium using the spectrofluorometer.

We used a simple model to measure the export rate for all the strains. Since the cultures are in exponential phase, we take

After a few calculations, we find that

Next we show the average temporal evolution for each strains used.

Figure X. check

Trp Secretion at different His concentrations in medium and His secretion at different Trp concentrations in medium

We started cultures in -T of the following strains:

i. strain TCY3081+pCM185 containing device2 ii. strain TCY3081+pCM185 containing device4 iii. strain TCY3081+pCM185 (empty plasmid)

We measured the OD of the cultures after 12 hs. We prepared cultures with increasing concentrations of His in medium (1X, 1/4; 1/8; 0X)and set cultures at initial OD: 0.1. After 5 hours we measured the final OD and Trp in medium.

Strain characterization

Experimental determination of K death

In order to determinate the K death used in the modeling section of our wiki, we set cultures of the two auxotrophic strains without being transformed (TCY3081 and TCY3128) in medium –HT at an initial OD of 0.01.

Taking into account that an OD:1 is approximately 3.10 7 cells/ml, we plated 133 µl in order to have around 200 colonies in the first day. Each following day we plated the same amount of µl of the culture and counted the number of colonies obtain in each plate. We set 3 replica of each strain.

TABLA CON EL NUMERO DE CELULAS POR DIA

Growth rate in function of the concentration of Trp and His

ESTO NO DEBE SER UNA SECCION DE ACA, SINO DE STRAIN CHARACTERIZATION, COMO UNA CONTINUACIÒN DEL EXPERIMENTO DE ALAN

We aimed to test the growth of the strains in different concentrations of external Trp and His in order to determine the amount of aminoacid at which the culture reaches half of the maximum growth (parameter K in the modeling of our system).

We therefore made a series of cultures with increasing concentrations of Trp (Series 1)and His (Series 2). We set the cultures of the different strains at a low initial OD:0.001 with the following scheme:

Series 1: strain TCY3081 (non transformed)in each Trp concentration (dilutions 1/32; 1/16; 1/8; 1/4; 1/2; 1x)

Series 2: strain TCY3128 (non transformed)in each His concentration (dilutions 1/32; 1/16; 1/8; 1/4; 1/2; 1x)

Controls: As control we started cultures of each strain in complete medium.

Cultures were left overnight (12 hs) and we measured OD reached with the use of spectrophotometer.

RESULTADOS:

ANALISIS DE VERO

Co-Culture of strains

We proceeded then to test the coculture growth of transformed strains with devices vs transformed strains with empty devices and non transformed strains.

Table: Coculture planification. Number indicates level of priority of the experiment for characterization of devices. Due to a time constrain, we ordered the experiments by level of priority and proceeded to test our devices by cocultures 1 and 2.

Starters of each strain were done in medium complementary to the auxotrophy of the strain so that they would maintain their plamids (medium –H for pEG202; medium –T for pCM182/5 and medium SC for cells without plasmid), then sonicated briefly in low power and then washed with medium –H-T . When they are in exponential phase, we set the coculture of strains was at OD 600: 0.02 (Total, 1:1), in 5 ml of medium –H-T.

We used epifluorescence microscope in order to determinate the strain proportion of each coculture. We used a 384 wells plate , with 20 µl of cyclohexamide 2x (CHX 2x) in each of the wells where we placed a sample. The density of the culture was calculated based on the cell density at in each wells.

Graph: 384 wells plate to be used for epifluorescence microscope.

Table: Coculture planification for number 1.