"
Team:UC Chile2/Results/Gibson
From 2012.igem.org
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| - | |||
Having in mind that the small part would be chewed up by the T5 exonuclease and that with no insert available the remaining backbone would end up assembling with its selfcomplementary ends, we decided to see if we could test if by changing the amount of T5 exonuclease in the reaction we could improve our rate of true positives. | Having in mind that the small part would be chewed up by the T5 exonuclease and that with no insert available the remaining backbone would end up assembling with its selfcomplementary ends, we decided to see if we could test if by changing the amount of T5 exonuclease in the reaction we could improve our rate of true positives. | ||
| Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
[[File:Gibson for small parts.jpg|left | 500px]] | [[File:Gibson for small parts.jpg|left | 500px]] | ||
| - | [[File:T5.jpg | 463px| right]] | + | [[File:T5 exp.jpg | 463px| right]] |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 65: | ||
<h2>Conclusion</h2> | <h2>Conclusion</h2> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| - | According to the results we obtained in this experiment we conclude that according to our DNA concentration conditions (0.00125 pmoles/uL) and ratio of insert to backbone (5:1), the Gibson Assembly reaction is already optimized for small parts. | + | According to the results we obtained in this experiment we conclude that according to our DNA concentration conditions (0.00125 pmoles/uL) and ratio of insert to backbone (5:1), the Gibson Assembly reaction is already optimized for small parts of 140bp. |
{{UC_Chilefooter}} | {{UC_Chilefooter}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:31, 25 September 2012
Contents |
Gibson Assembly for small parts
During the construction of our first plasmid, we had many problems dealing with getting correct assemblies of the constructs which involved small parts (< 200bp). We found that for those kind of assemblies, people would recommend using as much as 5 times more DNA from the smaller insert in relation to the amount of plasmid backbone, arguing that such a small insert would be completely chewed up by the T5 exonuclease when in small amount.
Our analysis of the reaction gave us notion that theoretically, the number of resulting colonies would be in direct relation to the amount of available backbone. However, the total number of true positives would only be influenced by the ratio at which the inserts could compete with the assembly of aberrant constructs, such as the one described by the Washington University 2011 iGEM Team about selfcomplementarity of the NotI sequences embedded in the prefix and suffix.
Having in mind that the small part would be chewed up by the T5 exonuclease and that with no insert available the remaining backbone would end up assembling with its selfcomplementary ends, we decided to see if we could test if by changing the amount of T5 exonuclease in the reaction we could improve our rate of true positives.
To challenge this, we designed a Gibson Assembly which involved a small part of mRFP1 and a large backbone for it to assemble. Our design included a strategy to quickly identify those colonies which where true positives from false positive.
We used pSB4K5-J04450 and selected a portion of mRFP1 which would measure 100bp plus the 40bp from the overlaps. The part being in the middle of the mRFP1, that way if assemble is succesful, then you'll obtain the wild type mRFP1 making the colony visibly red.
We situated the small amplicon in such a way that if by any chance there was recircularization of the backbone, the resulting juncture would provide a helpful in-frame TAA stop codon to finish translation and evidence a false positive.
The experiment was done for 6 different concentrations of T5 exonuclease, in squareroot of 10 magnitude changes of the original T5 concentration. The concentrations were: 0X, 1/10X, 1/sqrt(10)X, 1X, sqrt(10)X and 10X T5 exonuclease.
Methods for the preparation of the experiment can be found in the protocols section.
Total count of colonies
We obtained varying amount of number of colonies, with a clear tendency to increase towards the reaction with 1X concentration of T5 exonuclease in the Master Mix.
Efficiency of reaction
When calculating the efficiency of the reaction (in terms of true positive rate) we also see an increase of true positive rate towards the reaction with 1X concentration of T5 exonuclease in the Master Mix.
Conclusion
According to the results we obtained in this experiment we conclude that according to our DNA concentration conditions (0.00125 pmoles/uL) and ratio of insert to backbone (5:1), the Gibson Assembly reaction is already optimized for small parts of 140bp.
