Team:XMU-China/digitaldisplay
From 2012.igem.org
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<p align="left"><strong class="subtitle"><a name="_Toc02" id="_Toc02"></a>Basic principles of digital display:</strong><br> | <p align="left"><strong class="subtitle"><a name="_Toc02" id="_Toc02"></a>Basic principles of digital display:</strong><br> | ||
In our project, we utilized tubes with different kinds of bacteria as seven segments. According to the theory of network design, genetic logic gates were assembled into circuits and then constructed using synthetic biology method. Based on the knowledge of bioinformatics and synthetic biology, there are only two results for a single logic gate: on and off. Here, instead of electric signals representing streams of binary ones and zeros, the chemical concentrations of specific DNA-binding proteins and inducer molecules act as the input and output signals of the genetic logic gates, i.e. present or absent of a specific signal molecule represents binary one or zero. The genetic circuits we constructed actually using Binary-Coded Decimal (a device which converts the binary numerical value to decimal value) to compute signal molecules. To display two results (in this case, number one and zero) necessitates one kind of signal molecule (As shown in Table 1). The number of displaying results determines how many kinds of input signals we need, i.e. the kinds of inducers. More specifically, if there are N pairs of inducers and their corresponding regulators, we can get 2N kinds of results (As shown in Table 2). | In our project, we utilized tubes with different kinds of bacteria as seven segments. According to the theory of network design, genetic logic gates were assembled into circuits and then constructed using synthetic biology method. Based on the knowledge of bioinformatics and synthetic biology, there are only two results for a single logic gate: on and off. Here, instead of electric signals representing streams of binary ones and zeros, the chemical concentrations of specific DNA-binding proteins and inducer molecules act as the input and output signals of the genetic logic gates, i.e. present or absent of a specific signal molecule represents binary one or zero. The genetic circuits we constructed actually using Binary-Coded Decimal (a device which converts the binary numerical value to decimal value) to compute signal molecules. To display two results (in this case, number one and zero) necessitates one kind of signal molecule (As shown in Table 1). The number of displaying results determines how many kinds of input signals we need, i.e. the kinds of inducers. More specifically, if there are N pairs of inducers and their corresponding regulators, we can get 2N kinds of results (As shown in Table 2). | ||
- | <table width=" | + | <table width="700" border="0" align="center" id="commun"> |
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <td width=" | + | <td width="700"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/a/a8/XMUDigitaldisplayTable1.jpg" width="900" align="middle" ></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
- | <tr><td align="center"><b>Table 1</b> Design of binary display. Inducer or so called signal molecule here is arabinose, which is an inducer of an <i>E.coli</i> promoter(See more[6]), In the absence of arabinose, cI regulated promoter(<i>P<sub>cI</sub></i>) expresses GFP with LVA tag. In the presence of arabinose, <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> starts transcription and then repressor CI protein is translated and represses <i>P<sub>cI</sub></i>.</td></tr> | + | <tr><td align="center" ><b>Table 1</b> Design of binary display. Inducer or so called signal molecule here is arabinose, which is an inducer of an <i>E.coli</i> promoter(See more[6]), In the absence of arabinose, cI regulated promoter(<i>P<sub>cI</sub></i>) expresses GFP with LVA tag. In the presence of arabinose, <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> starts transcription and then repressor CI protein is translated and represses <i>P<sub>cI</sub></i>.</td></tr> |
</table> | </table> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 04:35, 25 September 2012
Contents[hide][show] |
---|
Project
Figure 1: A traditional electric seven-segment display (showing number "0") |
Basic principles of digital display:
In our project, we utilized tubes with different kinds of bacteria as seven segments. According to the theory of network design, genetic logic gates were assembled into circuits and then constructed using synthetic biology method. Based on the knowledge of bioinformatics and synthetic biology, there are only two results for a single logic gate: on and off. Here, instead of electric signals representing streams of binary ones and zeros, the chemical concentrations of specific DNA-binding proteins and inducer molecules act as the input and output signals of the genetic logic gates, i.e. present or absent of a specific signal molecule represents binary one or zero. The genetic circuits we constructed actually using Binary-Coded Decimal (a device which converts the binary numerical value to decimal value) to compute signal molecules. To display two results (in this case, number one and zero) necessitates one kind of signal molecule (As shown in Table 1). The number of displaying results determines how many kinds of input signals we need, i.e. the kinds of inducers. More specifically, if there are N pairs of inducers and their corresponding regulators, we can get 2N kinds of results (As shown in Table 2).
Table 1 Design of binary display. Inducer or so called signal molecule here is arabinose, which is an inducer of an E.coli promoter(See more[6]), In the absence of arabinose, cI regulated promoter(PcI) expresses GFP with LVA tag. In the presence of arabinose, PBAD starts transcription and then repressor CI protein is translated and represses PcI. |
Table 2 The number of inducers(N) and its corresponding results. |
Luminescent method: GFP with LVA tag
The device utilizes green fluorescent protein as luminescent source. The use of the fluorescence protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea Victoria is ubiquitous in the field of biological signal protein and become widely applied in situ monitoring and other researches. But traditional mutated GFP tends to be very stable, leading to a long degradation time, being unfavorable to the reuse of the device. A novel type of GFP solves the problem with its specific C-terminal oligopeptide extensions which can render stable proteins susceptible to degradation by protease. The project applies GFP with LVA tag, which is one of unstable types of GFP and presents fast degradation and relatively short half-life. Equipped this kind of GFP, the device could light up and die out in a fast speed, therefore becomes available to be repetitively used.
Circuit construction:
In order to display the number related to the environmental substances investigation, the device should contains different combinations of tandem and parallel logic gates. As mentioned in explanation of principles, input signals are inducer molecules, functioning as the switches of protein expression in circuit. Output of the circuit is GFP with LVA tag.
We assembled several pairs of promoters and their activators (or repressors) into computing blocks of the circuit: P_BAD-Arabinose, P_cI-CI, and P_tetR-TetR. These computation units act as genetic logic gates perform AND, OR and NOT gates function. Once the construction is completed, Engineered E.coli with different circuits can be immobilized into microcapsules and then be put in seven transparent tubes which acting as segment of display.
Table 3 Biological digital display which responds to two inducers. |
Future plan:
For our current achievement, ...
To solve the problem we encountered this summer, more research works are badly needed. As David Sprinzak and Michael B. Elowitz mentioned at the beginning of their paper[2], to answer fundamental questions about existed circuits, one could design and build new circuits using similar components. The main goal of this nascent field of synthetic biology is to design and to construct biological systems and study their dynamics in organism[3].
References
[1] S. B. Ron Weiss, Sara Hooshangi, Natural Computing 2003, 2, 47-84.
[2] A. Eldar and M. B. Elowitz, Nature 2010, 467, 167-173.
[3] B.-S. Chen and C.-H. Wu, BMC Systems Biology 2009, 3, 66.
[4] T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor and J. J. Collins, Nature 2000, 403.
[5] M. B. Elowitz and S. Leibler, Nature 2000, 403, 335-338.
[6] R. Schleif, Trends in Genetics 2000, 16, 559-565.