Team:Goettingen/week10-2
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 534: | Line 534: | ||
In order to clone the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs into pSB1C3, all components were digested with <i>EcoRI</i> and <i>PstI</i> according to the protocol. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments. </li> | In order to clone the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs into pSB1C3, all components were digested with <i>EcoRI</i> and <i>PstI</i> according to the protocol. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments. </li> | ||
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
- | The gel did not feature fragments of the expected size.Obviously, something was wrong with the digestion. </li> | + | The gel did not feature fragments of the expected size. Obviously, something was wrong with the digestion. </li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 569: | Line 569: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by | + | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following protocol. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% agarose gel.<br> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The PCR failed for no bands were visible on the gel whereas the marker was clearly discernible.</li> | The PCR failed for no bands were visible on the gel whereas the marker was clearly discernible.</li> | ||
Line 586: | Line 586: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by | + | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following protocol. Additionally, a negative control as well as a positive control were prepared this time. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% agarose gel.<br></li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The did not function again for no bands were visible on the gel; only the marker was clearly discernible. However, since also the positive control did not feature the slightest band, we assume that something might be wrong with our polymerase.</li> | The did not function again for no bands were visible on the gel; only the marker was clearly discernible. However, since also the positive control did not feature the slightest band, we assume that something might be wrong with our polymerase.</li> | ||
Line 602: | Line 602: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | To give it a last try the <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by | + | To give it a last try the <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by <i>pfu</i> polymerase according to the following protocol one last time. Here again, a 1% agarose gel was prepared to investigate the PCRs outcome.</li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The gel of the PCR delivered the same picture as last time. No band could be observed except for the marker. Even the positive control does not work. Thus, we decided to buy a new polymerase.</li> | The gel of the PCR delivered the same picture as last time. No band could be observed except for the marker. Even the positive control does not work. Thus, we decided to buy a new polymerase.</li> | ||
Line 610: | Line 610: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The digestion of the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs EcoRI and PstI were applied according to the protocol. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments.<br> | + | The digestion of the <i>flhDC</i>-promoter constructs <i>EcoRI</i> and <i>PstI</i> were applied according to the protocol. The restriction products were subsequently separated on a gel in order to verify the digestions success and purify the desired fragments.<br> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
The digestion was successful. Bands of the expected size could be observed and cut out.</li> | The digestion was successful. Bands of the expected size could be observed and cut out.</li> | ||
Line 627: | Line 627: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Experiment: <br> | <li>Experiment: <br> | ||
- | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by Phusion | + | The genes <i>fliC</i> (DH10B), <i>fliC</i> (<i>Salmonella</i>), <i>motA</i>, <i>motB</i> and <i>yhjH</i> were amplified by Phusion polymerase according to the following protocol. We also prepared a negative control as well as a positive control. The success of the PCR was subsequently investigated preparing a 1% analytical agarose gel.<br></li> |
<li>Observations & Results: <br> | <li>Observations & Results: <br> | ||
- | Finally,the PCR was successful! We were able to receive bands of the expected size for each construct. Obviously, the | + | Finally,the PCR was successful! We were able to receive bands of the expected size for each construct. Obviously, the <i>pfu</i> polymerase was not functional anymore and had caused the PCRs failure. </li> |
<br></td></tr> | <br></td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Revision as of 13:35, 18 September 2012
Language: English, Deutsch
|
#2 Speed Improvement - 10th weekBack to overview
↑ Return to top
|