Team:Cornell/project/drylab/animation

Protein Structures

When making a 3D animation, it's important to define several features early on in the process to have an overview of where the animation is going and the style in which its actors will be represented. In this case, we wanted to depict the Mtr pathway in Shewanella oneidensis, so one of the first things I decided was to have accurate protein models.

RCSB PDB (Protein Data Bank) is an amazing resource that has virtually every published protein structure. Unfortunately, there is only one Mtr protein whose structure has been published, MtrF, whose role in the Mtr pathway is so peripheral that I chose not to represent it in the animation. This left me with two options: (1) find proteins that should be related, and use their structures, or (2) generate predicted structures. In the spirit of accuracy, I chose to generate predicted structures.

Using the gene sequences from NCBI, identified the open reading frame and translated the proteins with ApE. I used two online tools for structure prediction: PSIPRED Protein Structure Prediction Server, which uses two neural networks to detect secondary structure by amino acid motifs, and SWISS-MODEL, which has a tool that uses sequence alignments to find proteins with published structures that have regions likely to be homologous, then predicts structure based on the homologous region.

Unfortunately, a major shortcoming of SWISS-MODEL is that it only predicts structure in the homologous region; any amino acids outside of that have to be added back and folded by other means. For this purpose, I used PyMOL to add back the missing residues, and the standalone version of Fold.It to fold them. I used the secondary structure predictions from PSIPRED for these residues. For CymA, MtrA, and MtrC, this involved folding up to 50 residues at each end, which was simple, but for MtrB, believed to be a beta barrel protein, SWISS-MODEL only produced about half of the barrel, so I spent nearly a week manually folding over 300 residues into the shape of the missing beta sheets.

Stylistic Decisions

Once I had the structures, the rest of the animation had to be determined. The second very important stylistic decision was to use a style of animation that emulates scanning electron microscope images. While realistic lighting and shaders can look pretty awesome, they really don't convey information particularly well. If you've ever played a game where outlines or highlighting are used in some way to indicate an item or character of interest, it's very clear how much a simple step like that can enhance the accessibility of visual information. Initially I considered a "toon" style, which meets these requirements very directly. However, after trying several different shaders, I found that SEM images actually have a similar effect, as the brightness of a surface is dependent on the angle relative to the camera; on surfaces that curve away from the camera, this causes edges to show up much brighter.

The third stylistic decision lay in how to represent election transfer. How does one really show events at the quantum level? They don't really have any set visual representation. The simplest way would be to show a small particle passing between electron carriers, but that would be pretty boring and difficult to see. Instead, I decided to represent electron transfer as lightning: it's bright, it's flashy, and it's dramatic. Autodesk Maya also provides a very easy-to-use dynamic lightning tool, facilitating this decision greatly.

The final stylistic decision lay in how to show the differences between our system when induced and not induced. I opted for a side-by-side splitscreen in the interest of keeping the animation time-efficient, and to allow direct comparison of the two as they're occurring, rather than sequentially, which relies on the viewer remembering the events of the previous sequence. Furthermore, because most elements remain the same, showing them sequentially would be repetitive.