Team:UC Chile/Results/Gibson

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{UC_Chile4}} <h1>Gibson Assembly for small parts</h1> right During the construction of our first plasmid, we had many problems dealing with ge...")
Line 7: Line 7:
<br>
<br>
-
Our analysis of the reaction gave us notion that theoretically, the number of resulting colonies would be in direct relation to the amount of available backbone. However, the total number of true positives would only be influenced by the ratio at which the inserts could compete with the assembly of aberrant constructs, such as the one described by the Washington University 2011 iGEM Team about <html><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Washington/Magnetosomes/GibsonVectors" target="_blank">selfcomplementarity</a></html> of the NotI sequences embedded in the prefix and suffix.
+
Our analysis of the reaction gave us the notion that the number of resulting colonies would be in direct relationship to the amount of available backbone. However, the total number of true positives would only be influenced by the ratio at which the inserts could compete with the assembly of aberrant constructs, such as the one described by the Washington University 2011 iGEM Team about <html><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Washington/Magnetosomes/GibsonVectors" target="_blank">selfcomplementarity</a></html> of the NotI sequences embedded in the prefix and suffix.
<br>
<br>
-
Having in mind that the small part would be chewed up by the T5 exonuclease and that with no insert available the remaining backbone would end up assembling with its selfcomplementary ends, we decided to see if we could test if by changing the amount of T5 exonuclease in the reaction we could improve our rate of true positives.
+
Considering that the small part would be degraded by the T5 exonuclease and that without insert available the remaining backbone would end up assembling with its selfcomplementary ends, we decided to evaluate whether by changing the amount of T5 exonuclease in the reaction we could improve our rate of true positives.
<br>
<br>
-
To challenge this, we designed a Gibson Assembly which involved a small part of mRFP1 and a large backbone for it to assemble. Our design included a strategy to quickly identify those colonies which where true positives from false positive.
+
To test this hypothesis, we designed a Gibson Assembly which involved a small part of mRFP1 and a large backbone. Our design included a strategy to quickly identify those colonies which where true positives from false positives.
<br>
<br>

Revision as of 19:33, 26 September 2012

Project: Luxilla - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, iGEM 2012