Team:UC Chile/Cyanolux/Results

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{UC_Chile4}}
{{UC_Chile4}}
-
Question:
 
Line 28: Line 27:
<h2>pSB1A3_IntC (From 2010 Utah's iGEM team)</h2>
<h2>pSB1A3_IntC (From 2010 Utah's iGEM team)</h2>
-
We decided to use this plasmid to place the LuxCDEG part of the Lux operon in this plasmid, however after various attempts to transform Synechocystis without success we reconsidered (see below SOMEWHERE!!! [[]]) due to problems regarding the design of this plasmid backbone. After analyzing the sequence of the vector (CODE HERE) we blasted the sequences of the recombination sites and we found out that position of the sequences of each recombination site are swapped, leaving the backbone part of the plasmid to be integrated into the genome. Furthermore, the recombination sites are separated by aproximately 2.2 kilobases, knocking out 4 genes.
+
We decided to use this plasmid to place the LuxCDEG part of the Lux operon in this plasmid, however after various attempts to transform Synechocystis without success we reconsidered (see below SOMEWHERE!!! [[]]) due to problems regarding the design of this plasmid backbone. After analyzing the sequence of the vector (CODE HERE) we blasted the sequences of the recombination sites and we found out that position of the sequences of each recombination site are swapped, leaving the backbone part of the plasmid to be integrated into the genome. Furthermore, the recombination sites are separated by aproximately 2.2 kilobases, knocking 1 gene.
-
[[File: Construct Recombination sites position.jpg| 300px| right]]
+
[[File: Construct Recombination sites position.jpg| 500px| center]]
-
[[File: Position in genomic DNA.jpg| 300px| right]]
+
<br>
 +
You can see their original construct design [https://2010.igem.org/Design_usu.html#Overview_of_Integration| here].
-
[[File:UC_Chile-CN2Y_Possible_Recombination.jpg|500px|center]]
+
[[File: Position in genomic DNA.jpg| 300px| right]]
-
 
+
-
[[File:UC_Chile-INT_C_Febugging.jpg|500px|center]]
+
Line 46: Line 44:
<h3>Substrate production under Pcaa3</h3>
<h3>Substrate production under Pcaa3</h3>
-
We have amplified all parts for the Gibson Assembly of the final construct under the Pcaa3 promoter (which has also been Biobricked with code [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743002 | K743002] and we will make the assembly today (9/25/12).  
+
We have assembled all parts of the substrate production pathway ([http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325902| LuxCD] and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K325903| LuxEG]) for the final construct under the Pcaa3 promoter (which has also been Biobricked with code [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743002 K743002] and we are now verifying for positive assembles.
<h3>Substrate production under PsigE</h3>  
<h3>Substrate production under PsigE</h3>  
-
We are re-amplifying the LuxCD part (to obtain higher concentrations of the insert) and we will try the assembly today (9/25/12).
+
As this assembly was unsuccessful previously, we are re-amplifying the LuxCD part (to obtain higher concentrations of the insert) and we will retry the assembly after the wiki freeze.
Line 58: Line 56:
While we managed to acquire an inoculum of Synechocystis PCC 6803, no conditions were set for working with Synechocystis PCC 6803 in our faculty. We proceeded to standardize our own growth conditions by building a custom made cyanobacterial incubator based on growth conditions described in the literature (References?)
While we managed to acquire an inoculum of Synechocystis PCC 6803, no conditions were set for working with Synechocystis PCC 6803 in our faculty. We proceeded to standardize our own growth conditions by building a custom made cyanobacterial incubator based on growth conditions described in the literature (References?)
 +
<br>
<br>
-
Here we show our growth curve for Synechocystis PCC 6803 using the conditions set in our [[Team:UC_Chile2/DIY | DIY]]) shaking incubator (40uE//m²), 90 RPM, 30°C.
+
 
 +
Here we show our growth curve for Synechocystis PCC 6803 using the conditions set in our [[Team:UC_Chile2/DIY | DIY]]) shaking incubator (40uE/s/m²), 90 RPM, 30°C.
 +
 
<br>
<br>
Methods for the growth curve characterization of Synechocystis PCC 6803 over [[Team:UC_Chile2/Protocols#SyneGrowth | here]].
Methods for the growth curve characterization of Synechocystis PCC 6803 over [[Team:UC_Chile2/Protocols#SyneGrowth | here]].
 +
 +
[[File: Figure for the growth curve.jpg| 500px |center]]
<h2>Transforming Synechocystis PCC 6803</h2>
<h2>Transforming Synechocystis PCC 6803</h2>
 +
 +
After corroborating our constructs we proceded with the [Team:UC_Chile/Protocols#Transformation_of_Synechocystis_PCC._6803| Synechocystis transformation] for each of the constructs as soon as we obtained sufficient concentration (10ug) of the construct.
 +
 +
Transformation in Synechocystis takes about 2 weeks to reveal transformant colonies, which in turn have to restreaked again before PCR verification. This is necesary due to the high remaining amount of plasmid in the Millipore membrane which may serve as template for the colony PCR, inducing false positive verification bands.
 +
 +
<h3>BBa_K743009</h3>
 +
 +
[[File:C1RCHILE.JPG|500px| right]]
 +
 +
This picture shows a transformation after 11 days. On the left there is the control transformation plate (no DNA) on antibiotic and in the right a positive transformation of [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K743009 K743009] with its corresponding Synechocystis colonies growing througout the Millipore membrane on the same antibiotic.
 +

Revision as of 04:04, 26 September 2012

Project: Luxilla - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, iGEM 2012