"
Team:TU Munich/Results/RFC
From 2012.igem.org
(→Answers) |
(→Answers) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|- class="hintergrundfarbe6" | |- class="hintergrundfarbe6" | ||
| - | !style="width: | + | !style="width:50px%"| aa !! style="width:20%" | bb |
!style="width:20%"| cc !! class="unsortable" style="width:20%" | dd | !style="width:20%"| cc !! class="unsortable" style="width:20%" | dd | ||
!style="width:20%"| ee | !style="width:20%"| ee | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 21 September 2012
Contents
|
The Idea: Its all about standardization...
Text describing the idea.
The Survey: Integrating community opinions...
The presented survey aimed to verify if there is a need for better BioBrick part descriptions (question 4 ), if it is belived that standardization of part descriptions could help to improove the situation (questions 5) and if the iGEM community is interested in testing a template for standardized part descriptions as presented by our team (question 6). The last two questions (question 7 and 8) were intended to collect usefull ideas how to improve our first blueprint of a standardized BioBrick part description template.
The survey can be found under: iGEM TU Munich's survey on standardization of BioBrick part descriptions
Outline data of the survey:
- Start of the survey: 14th september 2012
- End of the survey: 20th september 2012
- Number of participants: 147 people participated in the survey; thereof 78,9% (116 participants) completed the survey
- Number of involved teams: 55
- Distribution channels: The survey was sent to all contact addresses of iGEM Teams from this year, posted on iGEM 2012's Community Page and posted on our as well on the iGEM Headquarters twitter account.
Question 1 and 2:
Answers
| aa | bb | cc | dd | ee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bielefeld-Germany | Colombia | UCSF | BioscienceDragons_AZ | |
| Beispiel4 | Beispiel5 | Beispiel6 | ||
| Beispiel7 | Beispiel8 | Beispiel9 |
- WLC-Milwaukee
- Wisconsin-Madison
- ZJU-China
- Goettingen
- Bonn
- Missouri_Miners
- British_Columbia
- Potsdam_Bioware
- UNAM_Genomics_Mexico
- Frankfurt
- Minnesota
- Costa_Rica-TEC-UNA
- NTNU_Trondheim
- Buenos_Aires
- SUSTC-Shenzhen-B
- MIT
- Johns_Hopkins-Wetware
- ULB-Brussels
- UNITN-Trento
- Valencia
- OUC-China
- METU
- Nevada
- Arizona_State
- Fatih-Medical
- CINVESTAV-IPN-UNAM_MX
- Slovenia
- UANL_Mty-Mexico
- TU_Darmstadt
- UC_Chile
- RHIT
- Utah_State
- Austin_Texas
- Caltech
- Duke
- Johns_Hopkins-Software
- SUSTC-Shenzhen-A
- HKUST-Hong_Kong
- Wageningen_UR
- Berkeley
- Bordeaux
- Groningen
- Queens_Canada
- Tec-Monterrey_EKAM
- Virginia
- Tuebingen
- Waterloo
- Valencia_Biocampus
- TU_Munich
- Marburg_SYNMIKRO
World map showing from where the teams are coming that have answered our survey:
Participants of TU München iGEM 2012 survey auf einer größeren Karte anzeigen
Question 3:
Answers
Question 4:
Answers
Question 5:
Answers
Question 6:
Answers
Question 7:
Question8:
Rewarding the participation in our survey
As a small present and to highlight their help in improving our attempt for standardization of BioBrick part descriptions we sent these badge to everyone in the iGEM community that participated in our survey and entered a contact email in Question 2. The sentence "O'zapft is!" yearly follows the traditional ritual of tapping the first barrel of Oktoberfest-beer and is the official start of the Oktoberfest that takes place in Munich.
Additionally to this badge we ruffled a typical bavarian present among all participants of our survey.
Interpretation and conclusion from the survey
Text.
The result: Our Request for Comments (RFC)
