Team:TU Munich/Results/RFC

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 27: Line 27:
====Question 2:====
====Question 2:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey2.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey2.gif|550px]]
-
Do you use BioBricks from the registry for your project?
 
====Question 3:====
====Question 3:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey3.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey3.gif|550px]]
-
How would you describe the average quality of the part descriptions that you dealt with?
 
====Question 4:====
====Question 4:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey4.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey4.gif|550px]]
-
Do you think a standardization of the part descriptions could increase the usability of BioBricks in the future?
 
====Question 5:====
====Question 5:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey5.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey5.gif|550px]]
-
We propose to use a standardized form for the part descriptions of BioBricks in the Parts Registry similar to the following: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K801999:Design].<br> Would you like to use such a standardized template providing a structure in the source code that just needs to be completed?
 
====Question 6:====
====Question 6:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey6.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey6.gif|550px]]
-
Do you have suggestions what kind of additional information should be included in the standardized part descriptions? So far the following information are included: * keywords, abbreviations, other versions of the BioBrick, RFC standard, deleted restriction sites, truncations of the nucleotidesequence - if coding for proteins * amino acid replacements, posttranslational modifications, enzymatic activities, cytotoxicity, source of the construct, originating organism, codonoptimization, literature references, sequence references, structure references.
 
====Question7:====
====Question7:====
[[File:TUM12_Survey7.gif|550px]]
[[File:TUM12_Survey7.gif|550px]]
-
Do you have any other suggestions how the usability of BioBricks could be increased by better describing them?
 

Revision as of 20:13, 14 September 2012



Contents

The Idea: Its all about standardization...


Text describing the idea.

The Survey: Integrating community opinions...


Text describing the idea.


The survey can be found under: TU Munich iGEM Team's survey on standardization of BioBrick part descriptions

Number of participants: 26


Participants of TU München iGEM 2012 survey auf einer größeren Karte anzeigen

The survey was sent to all contact addresses of iGEM Teams from this year.

Question 1:

500px

Question 2:

550px

Question 3:

550px

Question 4:

550px

Question 5:

550px

Question 6:

550px

Question7:

550px


TUM12 Collaboration medal1.png TUM12 Collaboration medal2.png



xxx completed TU Munich's survey on Standardization of BioBrick part descriptions

The result: Our Request for Comments (RFC)


Text describing the idea.