Team:TU Munich/Project/Constitutive Promoter



Constitutive Promoters

Responsible: Georg Schützinger

To control expression of the enzymes and proteins from our biosynthetic pathways a variety of promoters is essential. Since gyle from beer is a complex medium, the controlled induction of protein expression proves to be a difficult task. Therefore constitutive promoters are the ideal solution for that problem. They offer simplicity, and therefore are the first choice for the introduction of new biosynthetic pathways in yeast in complex media.

In order to finetune biosynthetic pathways with two or more enzymes, as in our with caffeine pathway, we want to use 3 constitutive promoters ADH1, TEF1 and TEF2 to account for the turnover rates of the different enzymes.

Their strength, and constant expression have been characterized by [[http:// Partow et al., 2010], [http:// Sun J. et al., 2012]] and many more. For illustration of their difference in strength TEF1-P and ADH1-P were cloned in front of Renilla Luciferase [ BBa_J52008] in pTUM100 [ BBa_K801001] and bioluminescence will be measured. The same experiment shall soon be also made with TEF2-P.

Background and principles

The promoter ADH1 is one of the most widely used constitutive promoters, for protein expression in yeast. It naturally controls the expression of Alcohol Dehydrogenase 1 of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. This enzyme is part of the yeast glycolytic pathway and is needed for the fermentation of glucose into alcohol. For that reason its natural form (1500 bp) is inhibited by ethanol. To avoid this problem, we used a shortened version (720 bp) [ BBa_K319005] that was successfully engineered and tested by http:// Ruohonen et al., 1995 and that is not susceptible to ethanol repression, thus providing constant expression throughout the brewing process.

The promoter TEF1 controls the expression of translation elongation factor EF1 alpha. The most important characteristics of this promoter for brewing is his high expression strength that is 5x above ADH1-P, and its insensitivity to repression by ethanol which often occurs with constitutive promoters from the yeast glycolytic pathway http:// 2010 Partow et al., 2010. During the brewing process expression even becomes stronger due a slight repression by Glucose at the beginning.

The promoter TEF2 controls the expression of a second gene for translation elongation factor EF1 alpha. Since TEF2 protein alone can keep mutants, lacking TEF1, growing, it is believed that it is an identical of nearly identical version of TEF1 protein http:// 1984 Schiermaier et al., 1984.

General remarks and issues

Original image taken from [Sun J. et al., 2012]. Comparison of promoter strength with GFP, cloned promoters are marked by arrows

For comparison of the promoter strength 3 timepoints were chosen. After 12 hours, after 24 hours and 48 hours. This way differences in activity due to varying Ethanol- and glucose concentrations can be analyzed. This would be the more interesting since the influence of these substances on the activity of TEF2-Promoter has not been analyzed this far. If you set the activity of TEF1-Promoter for 100%, the activity of ADH1-P should be roughly 20% and keep constant. TEF1-Promoter should reach 150 % during the later The activity of TEF2-P activity should be 40% at the beginning.

Gel picture of finished Constructs

20120918 ADH1-P und P791.png

  • Analytical digestion of ADH1-P with luciferase in pTUM100

20120918 TEF1-P und P791.png

  • Analytical digestion of TEF1-P with luciferase in pTUM100


[ BBa_K801001] pTUM101 yeast shuttle vector with pTEF1 promoter

[ BBa_K801002] pTUM102 yeast shuttle vector with pTEF2 promoter

[ BBa_K801003] pTUM103 yeast shuttle vector with pADH1 promoter

[ BBa_K801010] TEF2 constitutive yeast promoter

[ BBa_K801011] TEF1 yeast terminator

[ BBa_K801012] ADH1 yeast terminator