Team:Stanford-Brown/VenusLife/Chamber

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(The Millikan Apparatus)
(The Millikan Apparatus)
Line 24: Line 24:
Unfortunately, we encountered a few engineering issues while preparing for this experiment:
Unfortunately, we encountered a few engineering issues while preparing for this experiment:
-
*The engineering of the Millikan Apparatus viewing scope to excite and detect fluorescence was impractical and challening.
+
*The engineering of the Millikan Apparatus viewing scope to excite and detect fluorescence was impractical and challenging.
*Control tests on evaporation in the chamber indicated that droplets would evaporate in under 10 minutes; a timescale too rapid for studying cell replication.
*Control tests on evaporation in the chamber indicated that droplets would evaporate in under 10 minutes; a timescale too rapid for studying cell replication.
*Inconclusive evidence on whether or not the medium we were planning on using (SOC) could support bacteria on the order of hours and emit minimal to no autofluorescence.
*Inconclusive evidence on whether or not the medium we were planning on using (SOC) could support bacteria on the order of hours and emit minimal to no autofluorescence.

Revision as of 03:10, 4 October 2012


The Millikan Apparatus

In order to put our newly engineered organisms to the test in an aerosolized environment, the team aimed to modify a Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus into a functioning suspension chamber. Designed in 1909, the chamber was originally used by Robert Millikan and Harvey Fletcher to measure the elementary electric charge. The Apparatus is designed around a parallel pair of horizontal metal plates. Applying a potential difference across these plates creates a uniform electric field in the space between them, and thus charged droplets sprayed finely into the chamber can be made to rise and fall by altering the applied voltage. Instead of oil, we aimed to suspend a medium solution with our engineered biosensing bacteria in order to visualize whether these microorganisms were thriving in an aerosolized environment.

File:Millikan.gif
Source: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/mps/FCS/FCS_hist.htm

Unfortunately, we encountered a few engineering issues while preparing for this experiment:

  • The engineering of the Millikan Apparatus viewing scope to excite and detect fluorescence was impractical and challenging.
  • Control tests on evaporation in the chamber indicated that droplets would evaporate in under 10 minutes; a timescale too rapid for studying cell replication.
  • Inconclusive evidence on whether or not the medium we were planning on using (SOC) could support bacteria on the order of hours and emit minimal to no autofluorescence.
  • Insufficient time and resources to perform the necessary (and drastic) modifications to the Apparatus that would lead to successful experiments.

However, we successfully created cell-growth dependent promoters that function as remote biosensors; while our efforts in mechanical engineering were not so fruitful, the synthetic biology component was successful! In addition, our modeling component of this project provides insight and suggests that bacteria could feasibly inhabit the 50-60km layer of the Venusian atmosphere.

We would like to thank Diana Gentry for helping us with the mechanical engineering of the suspension chamber!

The Venus Life team presents the suspension chamber