Team:Peking/Modeling/Luminesensor

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 32: Line 32:
Since no multi-intermediate reactions are hidden in the network above, all reactions can be regarded as elementary reactions.
Since no multi-intermediate reactions are hidden in the network above, all reactions can be regarded as elementary reactions.
  </p>
  </p>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="PKU_context floatR">
 +
<h3 id="title5">Reference</h3>
 +
<p></p>
 +
<ul class="refer"><li id="ref1">
 +
1. V Sourjik, V., <i>et al.</i>(2002) Binding of the <i>Escherichia coli</i> response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. <i>Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA</i>, 99(20): 12669: 12674
 +
  </li><li id = "ref2">
 +
2. Vladimirov, N., Lovdok, L., Lebiedz, D., and Sourjik, V.(2008). Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. <i>PLoS Comput. Biol.</i>, 4: e1000242
 +
</li></ul>
</div>
</div>
</html>{{Template:Peking2012_Color_Epilogue}}
</html>{{Template:Peking2012_Color_Epilogue}}

Revision as of 13:00, 26 September 2012

Summary

We have managed conduct modeling to guide the optimization of our Luminesensor, combining protein kinetics, thermodynamics, and stochastic simulation with molecular docking together. The modeling results point out two critical mutation sites (74 & 135) on VVD, the dimerization domain and a mutant choise of LexA, the DNA binding domain of our Luminesensor. The modeling results also shows the system still works well even if considering noise and endogenous competition.

Kinetic Network

Firstly we established a reaction network for the DNA binding process of Luminesensor. Previous works by other scientists indicate that the Vivid (VVD) protein, a sensing domain of Luminesensor, dimerizes in the presence of light,[1] and the LexA protein, a binding domain of Luminesensor, binds at specific sequences on DNA predominantly when coupled[2] and subsequently represses the interest gene. By combining with the mechanisms of the two functional domains of Luminesensor, we concluded with the following kinetic network:

Network System Fig

Fig 1. Kinetic Network of our Luminesensor

where

  • L : Luminesensor,
  • LG : the ground state --- with its VVD N-cap locked,
  • LA : the active state --- with its VVD N-cap released,
  • DL : the specific DNA binding site to Luminesensor.

Since no multi-intermediate reactions are hidden in the network above, all reactions can be regarded as elementary reactions.

Reference

  • 1. V Sourjik, V., et al.(2002) Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99(20): 12669: 12674
  • 2. Vladimirov, N., Lovdok, L., Lebiedz, D., and Sourjik, V.(2008). Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4: e1000242
  • Totop Totop