Results

The Constructor

More efficient cloning, publication, importance of computational work in SynBio

iGEM 2011 team	iGEM project title	# of TU's in the designed circuit	# of used Biobrick Parts By team	Recommended by the Constructor	Processing time (min)
KAIST-Korea¹	E. casso	2	11	7	< 1 min
UANL_Mty-Mexico²	S.C.I.E.N.C.E. : Simple Code Interpretation Enabling Circuit in E. coli	7	26	25	674 min
XMU-China³	i-ccdB: intelligent Control of Cell Density in Bacteria	3	6	6	< 1 min
NTNU-Trondheim⁴	Red Fluorescent Stress Sensor	2	5	4	< 1 min
Wageningen UR⁵	The Synchroscillator: a Synchronized Oscillatory System	4	7	6	< 2 min

GFP-coil, coils, the idea

Designed the primers for amplification of the needed constructs
Delivered the proof of principle that these primers work [link to framshift, Hugo]
Provided the templates for modifications and placed them in the partsregistry
Isolated the PLRV from nature which, in theory, should be easy to modify on the outside

Negative CCMV, Frameshift

Detection Isolation from nature

We organised a mini Symposium for all dutch teams in the begining of the competition to create a national network and eventualy a national effort
We visited secondary schools to teach them about synthetic biology and let the make leafelets about synthetic biology.
We went to present our project and The Constructor at the Centre of Advanced Studies Synthetic Biology conference in Munich, where we learned a lot and get familiar with the German iGEM teams
We communicated to a graphical designer to obtain an kinetic graphical movie of our VLP formation, that is included in our introduction page movie.
We involved a communication study in our discovery festival human practises, so that we do not only inform the public, but also will have results on how scientist communicate with the public.
We have taken a number of inverviews with stakeholders to have an opinion of expert on our project, regulations around our project and about the idea of an open source environment