Team:Berkeley/Parts

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 26: Line 26:
The parts we constructed for registry submission may be viewed <a href="http://partsregistry.org/cgi/partsdb/pgroup.cgi?pgroup=iGEM2012&group=Berkeley">here</a>.
The parts we constructed for registry submission may be viewed <a href="http://partsregistry.org/cgi/partsdb/pgroup.cgi?pgroup=iGEM2012&group=Berkeley">here</a>.
-
We also built and characterized 3 promoters from the registry (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766557">pSTE5</a>, <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766555">pCYC1</a>, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766556">pADH1</a>), comparing them to another promoter (pTDH3) that we used. The data comparing the relative promoter strengths can be found <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/0/0f/IGEM_promoter_characterization.png">here</a>.
+
We also built and characterized 3 promoters from the registry (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766557">pSTE5</a>, <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766555">pCYC1</a>, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I766556">pADH1</a>), comparing them to another promoter (pTDH3) that we used. The data comparing the relative promoter strengths can be found <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Berkeley/Project/Localization#Promoter Characterization">here</a>.
</p>
</p>
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 03:39, 3 October 2012

header
iGEM Berkeley iGEMBerkeley iGEMBerkeley

Submitted parts:

1 Nucleus targeting Protein
1 Actin targeting protein
1 Vacuolar membrane targeting protein
1 Cellular periphery targeting sequence
2 Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins (red and green)
Total: 6 parts submitted to registry

The parts we constructed for registry submission may be viewed here. We also built and characterized 3 promoters from the registry (pSTE5, pCYC1, and pADH1), comparing them to another promoter (pTDH3) that we used. The data comparing the relative promoter strengths can be found here.