Team:Ehime-Japan/Modeling
From 2012.igem.org
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1. | The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1. | ||
<p/> | <p/> | ||
- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/a/ac/%E7%84%A1a%E9%A1%8C.png"> | |
+ | Fig Relation between Intensity of light and time<br> | ||
+ | We did not use date of 5 hour and 6 hour. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<p><font size="5"><p/> | <p><font size="5"><p/> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>Discussion<p/> |
<b> | <b> | ||
<p><font size="3"><p/> | <p><font size="3"><p/> | ||
Line 154: | Line 158: | ||
<b><p> | <b><p> | ||
(d [GFP-Lon tag])/dt = -k1 [GFP-Lon tag][Lon-LVA] | (d [GFP-Lon tag])/dt = -k1 [GFP-Lon tag][Lon-LVA] | ||
- | < | + | <br> |
(d [Lon-ClpXP])/dt = -k2 [Lon – LVA][LVA] +Lon synthesis rate | (d [Lon-ClpXP])/dt = -k2 [Lon – LVA][LVA] +Lon synthesis rate | ||
<p/> | <p/> |
Revision as of 03:39, 27 September 2012
Introduction
In our experiment of the E.co-mail, the important thing is to degrade GFP-Lon-tag more rapidly. GFP is usually stable and has a long half–life. So, we thought of how to measure the reaction rate.
Method
The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1.
Fig Relation between Intensity of light and time
Discussion
Because there is the propotional relationship between light intensity and GFP concentration, we made a graph of this and took collinear approximation. Besides considering parameter, three is this approximation straight line is primary rate equation.
(d [GFP-Lon tag])/dt = -k1 [GFP-Lon tag][Lon-LVA]
We did not use date of 5 hour and 6 hour.
(d [Lon-ClpXP])/dt = -k2 [Lon – LVA][LVA] +Lon synthesis rate